Posted on 07/28/2002 1:17:17 PM PDT by scripter
Part of my personal philosophy is: life's too short to respond to someone who asks such a question. If it takes 10 seconds to respond they've wasted 10 seconds of my life. Appreciate you two stepping in, though.
When they get near my children in any way, they will have a ferocious fight on their hands.
Hehehe…why do you care, are you “gay”?
Ring, Ring!
Hello kettle, this is pot…you’re black.
OK, what do you think the percentage for sodomy between homosexuals and heterosexuals is? Homosexuals 100% and heterosexuals…what?
Comparing man/woman relationships (right behavior) with perversion (wrong behavior) is ludicrous.
Hey, we can't offend a minority by telling the truth. This kind of thinking has had a tragic impact on the nation. Because a certain fact is unpopular dosn't make it untrue.
You missed the point.
The idea that anal and oral sex are risky for homosexuals and not risky for heterosexuals is ludicrous.
Back later to read and reply...
Someone should have asked Colin Powell if he would have sex with someone whom he knew had AIDS as long as he used a condom.
IMHO: Using a condom to make sex "safe" is like buckling a seatbelt before driving a car over a cliff to make the activity "safe".
Shalom.
Is it your custom to misread what is posted or do you have a particular agenda here?
Shalom.
There is none so blind as him who will not see.
If I start suggesting that some sexual behaviors are deviant then I might have to ask if my own preferences are deviant. I don't want to ask because I don't want to give them up. Therefore, to protect my own potential perversion I must protect the actual perversions of others. Shalom.
The way I do it is very safe.
Safe sex means only with your spouse.
Shalom.
I would like to point out that the sexual activities you participate in with your husband or wife (as the case may be) are blessed by God and not deviant unless performed outside the bonds of your marriage. Marriage being defined as 1 man and 1 woman. The traditional bond defined by God. Acts outside of that bond are not permitted.
I would generally concur. However, one should never put one's spouse at risk just for the sake of sexual pleasure. That said, I think sodomy would be out as would oral-anal activity. The potential price is too high and the reward is too low.
Shalom.
Of course you pro-sodomy cheerleaders need to believe that, how else can you live with yourself? I’ll bet you don’t know the first thing about paraphilic disorder, you probably believe what ever you are told in the media. People are capable of changing disordered behavior from a variety of mental illnesses, accepting wrong behavior as unchangeable is immoral, lazy and pathetic.
so WHO CARES?? …there's more important things to worry about.
For someone who lives in a country where there’s no Freedom of Speech I’ll trust your apathy is symptomatic of all your countrymen. Sitting around watching the moral fabric of ones country decay with drug abuse, the deconstruction of the family unit, children having children, social engineering and indoctrination in public schools and the acceptance of perversion as normal is something I care about, too bad you Canucks have “more important things to do.” We’re in a culture war here, only those who actually CARE need apply.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.