Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Solar Power to Challenge Dominance of Fossil Fuels
Reuters via Yahoo! ^ | Fri Aug 9, 9:31 AM ET | By Michelle Nichols

Posted on 08/09/2002 7:39:51 AM PDT by Momaw Nadon

MELBOURNE (Reuters) - Solar power is one of the world's fastest-growing renewable energy sources, offering a potentially endless supply of power generation capable of meeting the electricity demands of the whole planet.

Yet two billion people in developing countries lack access to modern energy services, while solar power -- a possible solution because of its availability anywhere on the globe -- accounts for just 0.1 percent of the world's primary energy demand.

"Solar power is all capital costs. What we are struggling with is how to get the capital -- how do we get the investment -- to these people to give them solar power," BP Solar president and chief executive Harry Shimp told Reuters.

When the U.N. World Summit on Sustainable Development convenes in Johannesburg Aug. 26, it will discuss how to deliver clean, modern energy to one third of the world's population and how to encourage the use of renewable energy in the developed world.

"Photovoltaic (solar energy) is the quickest and cheapest solution for supplying electricity to remote rural households in developing nations," Philippe de Renzy-Martin, executive vice president of Shell Solar told Reuters.

"However, progress is slow and government and multilateral agencies -- who want to fix the problem -- don't want to spend the necessary money."

The summit agenda includes proposals to develop and disseminate renewable energy technologies and to increase the market share of renewable energy sources to between five and 10 percent in all countries by 2010.

"Ultimately the world has to move toward renewable power. In 20-25 years the reserves of liquid hydrocarbons are beginning to go down so we have this window of time to convert over to renewables," said BP's Shimp.

COMPETITIVE WITHIN A DECADE

According to industry groups, solar power will become a serious threat to the global dominance of fossil fuel-fired generation within the next two decades as new technologies remove its main obstacle -- cost.

The U.S.-based Solar Energy Industries Association said that solar research has brought down prices to a point where the world could expect to see photovoltaic panels competing with natural gas-fired generation within the next five to eight years.

"Certainly within 20 years, if not much sooner, solar power will be as pervasive as any other power generation technology," said the association's executive director Glenn Hamer.

Statistics from the Global Environment Facility (GEF) show that the market for photovoltaic solar energy, the most commonly applied technology that directly converts sunlight into electricity, is growing by 15 percent a year.

Low temperature solar energy -- the direct conversion of sunlight into heat used mainly in space heating and hot water production -- is increasing by about eight percent annually. The GEF said around 10 million homes now use solar hot water heaters.

Another emerging technology is solar thermal electricity, which uses solar radiation to produce high-temperature heat to generate electricity.

Amazingly, the United Nations World Energy Assessment said solar thermal power plants covering just one percent of the world's deserts could meet the entire planet's current demands.

SOLAR REDUCES POVERTY

The potential for solar power to reduce poverty by delivering energy is already being realized through the GEF -- the largest source of international financial assistance for renewable energy development in developing countries.

The GEF has committed more than $200 million for projects aimed at creating sustainable markets for solar systems in Africa, Asia and South America. It aims to provide modern energy services to one billion of the world's poor by 2015.

"These systems provide a reliable source of electricity for lighting and a radio or television, and often cost no more than using traditional fuels such as kerosene," GEF chairman and chief executive officer Mohamed El-Ashry said in a statement.

However, Solar Energy International said that in developing countries solar power potential is being hindered by a failure to pass on the true costs of grid power to customers.

"If we had to pay the environmental costs, health costs and other social costs of our electricity usage, coal-fired electricity would be much more expensive and solar would be competitive," Laurie Stone, international project developer, told Reuters.

Japan, Germany and the United States account for 71 percent of the world's solar energy market, due to generous government grants encouraging the use of solar power.

But advances in technology could soon see solar power become a way of life with photovoltaic panels concealed in at least half the developed world's buildings.

The Australian company Sustainable Technologies International has become the first business in the world to begin manufacturing the revolutionary Titania Dye Solar Cells (DSC), which can be incorporated into buildings as glass walls.

"It is nanoparticulate, so the light can hit the glass at any angle," STI executive director Sylvia Tulloch told Reuters.

"Eventually all power could come from the sun. There are other renewable energy technologies that are fine too, but solar is probably going to make the most significant contribution."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Technical; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: energy; energylist; fossil; fuels; oil; opec; photovoltaic; power; renewable; saudiarabia; solar; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-169 next last
FYI and discussion
1 posted on 08/09/2002 7:39:51 AM PDT by Momaw Nadon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Won't the shade cast by all those solar panels affect the ecology?
2 posted on 08/09/2002 7:43:57 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
COMPETITIVE WITHIN A DECADE

That's what they've said for the last thirty years.

3 posted on 08/09/2002 7:45:33 AM PDT by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
To power a city the size of LA, you would need an area 5 times the size of the city converted to solar power generation. Talk about environmental damage! Of course, what the UN thinks of as "necessary" power supplies doesn't exactly mesh with what the first world and market thinks of as necessary.

I can remember reading books written in the seventies talking about how solar power would be competative in the next "two decades." Seems it hasn't made up much ground, has it?

4 posted on 08/09/2002 7:47:56 AM PDT by Charles H. (The_r0nin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
Bump, ping, touche or whatever!

Its going to be the world's salvation! Just like
nuclear power in the 70s, ay!

Mad Vlad
5 posted on 08/09/2002 7:48:02 AM PDT by madvlad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
solar power's gonna save the world. it'll solve all of the worlds problems with one fell swoop, yesireebob!

just give me lots of money and you'll see - trust me!

yeah. right. seen it before. BS.
6 posted on 08/09/2002 7:50:58 AM PDT by camle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Japan, Germany and the United States account for 71 percent of the world's solar energy market, due to generous government grants encouraging the use of solar power.

Well, that's one way to be competitive. No wonder solar power has captured such a large market share. Oh, but wait...it hasn't.

I have no doubt that the technology will improve, but then I have the same expectation for nuclear fusion.

7 posted on 08/09/2002 7:51:17 AM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madvlad
Its going to be the world's salvation! Just like nuclear power in the 70s, ay!

At least solar power has the politics behind it, whereas nuclear fission had the politics squarely against it. I still firmly believe that nuclear fission is the best available power source.

8 posted on 08/09/2002 7:54:00 AM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
With all of these photovoltaic cells in buildings and on roofs, aren't we simply going to to move to a different kind of pollution? Photovoltaic cells don't last forever, right? They contain chemicals and heavy metals, don't they? So, will we recycle? Pretty expensive?
9 posted on 08/09/2002 8:00:58 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: camle
solar power's gonna save the world. it'll solve all of the worlds problems with one fell swoop, yesireebob!

I acknowledge that the promises made about solar energy in the past have not come to pass.

However, if solar energy does become economically viable, I can't think of a better way to bankrupt the nations of OPEC, especially Saudi Arabia, who are the chief financiers of terrorism.

Not having to purchase foreign oil is potentially one of the greatest weapons we could use against our enemies in the Middle East.

10 posted on 08/09/2002 8:01:27 AM PDT by Momaw Nadon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
"Solar power is all capital costs. What we are struggling with is how to get the capital -- how do we get the investment -- to these people to give them solar power," BP Solar president and chief executive Harry Shimp told Reuters.

Cost is only one of the challenges. There are others (like safety). But the main challenge is this: What do you do when the sun don't shine? Even if you found a cloudless, smogless place, you'll lose your primary energy source at least half the time.

According to industry groups, solar power will become a serious threat to the global dominance of fossil fuel-fired generation within the next two decades as new technologies remove its main obstacle -- cost.

That's not its main obstacle. People seem to forget there is this phenomenon associated with life on this planet, and its called night. PV panel output is zero for at least 50% of the time in most places, probably more, if you experience that other phenomenon associated with life on Earth, weather.

Japan, Germany and the United States account for 71 percent of the world's solar energy market, due to generous government grants encouraging the use of solar power.

Funny how no one seems to object to these government-supplied subsidies. The wackos raise holy hell about non-existent "subsidies" to the nuclear industry yet are silent or supportive of these same subsidies (which are real) to "renewable" energy sources. An interesting and hypocritical double standard that the press seems unwilling to give much coverage to.

The best use for solar right now is passive solar, but that has issues, too. It poses some safety risks, and is not always practical for all construction. But it does have some uses that put it far ahead in terms of practicality and economics than any kind of active or PV solar.

11 posted on 08/09/2002 8:05:01 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Last time I looked, solar energy was still one of the costliest energy sources available. I doubt if much has changed since then.
12 posted on 08/09/2002 8:05:52 AM PDT by rollin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
For years the problem with photovoltaic electricity generation has been efficiency (10-12% conversion at best). What are the new technologies that are going to improve this conversion efficiency? Furthermore, one of the primary problems with solar power is that it's not sunny every day and everywhere. So what is the backup source of power when the sun don't shine?

I think more realistically that solar power will be used to generate hydrogen (solar farms in sunny areas can be used side-by-side with agriculture) and the hydrogen will be used in fuel cell vehicles. Prototype systems like this already exist.

13 posted on 08/09/2002 8:07:30 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rollin
I'm building a house in Mid Missouri and looked at solar water heating.
I decided against it because the equipment I looked at was unreliable and worked only on sunny days (unless I wanted to spend a minimum of $5,000-$15,000 on storage batteries). I put in geothermal wells, proven technology, instead.
14 posted on 08/09/2002 8:09:19 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: *Energy_List
Indexing...
15 posted on 08/09/2002 8:11:03 AM PDT by jae471
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Solar power is all capital costs.

Except for the maintenance costs, which can be unpredictable. My neighbor trashed his system because he couldn't keep it working for more than a few weeks at a time.

16 posted on 08/09/2002 8:14:10 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
I agree with your desire not to enrich OPEC. however solar power doesn't have the technology to achieve it's promises, and because it is being over hyped, people will lose creedence.

It will fail not because it doesn't work, but because it has been overpromoted.
17 posted on 08/09/2002 8:15:56 AM PDT by camle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rollin
Last time I looked, solar energy was still one of the costliest energy sources available. I doubt if much has changed since then.

Agreed, solar energy may not become economically viable for decades.

However, my interest in posting the article was to generate a discussion of how we can turn to alternative sources of energy and therefore become less dependent on imports of oil from our enemies.

I also support nuclear power, wind power, hydroelectric power, and anything else that will allow us to go tell the Saudis and other terrorist supporters where they can shove their oil.

18 posted on 08/09/2002 8:18:13 AM PDT by Momaw Nadon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Charles H. (The_r0nin)
I don't see solar power competing head to head with fossil fuels in first world countries within a decade unless they make a major technological breakthrough in conversion efficiency, like from 15% to 50%, and do it within the next couple of years. Haven't seen any indication that they've even come close to that in the lab, let alone with a competitive product.
19 posted on 08/09/2002 8:24:32 AM PDT by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Solar Power to Challenge Dominance of Fossil Fuels

And Muhammad Ali is going to challenge Lennox Lewis.

20 posted on 08/09/2002 8:27:29 AM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-169 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson