Posted on 08/28/2002 5:16:11 PM PDT by 45Auto
Roughly 12% of Americans are convicted Felons. Less than half of them were incarcerated for their crimes. FYI, the classic common law definition of Felony (and the one Scalia uses) is a serious crime punishable by death.
I have a friend who is a convicted felon because his dog jumped the fence and chased a deer while he was on vacation.
It depends. If the Catholic Priests are the rapists in the news I'd certainly prohibit them from the Catholic Church.
But as a rule, no I wouldn't prohibit them from doing those things nor would I prohibit them from voting, that is as long as they are earning their own way. I believe in redemption.
However, felons who have committed violent crimes against innocent citizens can and should have their RTKABA abridged. Though I believe in redemption, I don't believe in turning the other cheek so I can get sucker punched again.
Now a couple for you.
Whats the recidivsm rate for violent criminals?
What rights can be abridged for citizens who committ violent crimes against other citizens?
And who does the abridging, the felon or the state?
Fine, what about the vast majority who are NON violent felons, convicted of a paper crime 25 years ago?
I don't know. As I said, my response was to your assertion in this thread from the reply you posted and I referenced that Bush and Ashcroft support the individual right to keep and bear arms. I do not believe that they do. All I said was, if you think that Bush and Ashcroft really support the individual right to keep and bear arms, you are mistaken, that is, if you critically read their position and examine what they are doing, not what their sound bites are.
I also made reference to other people who asserted that all felons should not be allowed to possess firearms. I thought I made it clear that I was not talking about you in this regard when I said "The people who think..." I never claimed to read everything you have ever posted. If my assertion is wrong then by all means correct me.
I'm arguing with absolutists. Some seem to argue that life, liberty and property can be abridged but in no case can the RTKABA. I disagree. How about you?
" KING " ? I've never said that's what he is , nor implied it. That you can even consider using that term, also proves how very little you are capable of any understanding anout anything at all. Your posts are poorly worded rehashings of of other people's rants. You " feel "; you don't THINK ! That means that you are easily persuaded by any glib tongue and therefore, not worthy to even comment ; let alone receive a cogent, rational reply.
My complaint with GWB is not that different from the many complaints I have had with many politicians over the last 40 years. I want to see the US Constitution enforced. I want to see GWB play hardball with the US Senate and appoint judges who will enforce the Constitution as written. In short my big complaint with GWB is he is not living up to his potential.
Stay well - stay safe - Stay armed - yorktown
Whats the recidivsm rate for violent criminals?
I have no idea. But if you're implying that it's too high, then the remedy is to put them in jail longer, or flog them, or execute them, or whatever (oh, and not to mention promote widespread gun ownership. That's usually pretty effective at stopping recividism dead in its tracks).
What rights can be abridged for citizens who committ violent crimes against other citizens?
Once they're in jail, they're in a domain completely separate from society, and completely subject to the arbitrary rule of the jail warden (as limited by applicable statutory law). That's the nature of prison. To treat them like jailbirds when they're back in society at large is to effectively extend the prison walls around all of society, something that freedom-loving people should be adamantly opposed to. It's simply a matter of closing a loophole that would otherwise be big enough to engulf the entire Constitution.
And who does the abridging, the felon or the state?
Philosophically, the felon. Legally, the state.
I highly doubt that it is, as it is attended by many veterans..
See if you can find a book called "Am I a Murderer?: Testament of a Jewish Ghetto Policeman" by Calel Perechondnik. It's a fascinating autobiography on one Jew's attempts to survive a slaughter.
I think that millions of "good Americans" would just shut up and keep their job on the "Munich-Aushwitz Rail Road", and most cops would go on house to house confiscation raids.
We are running out of time to do that. Next suggestion.
BTW, your way is what got us here. You HOPED that critter would vote your way but he didn't. Remember the term INCREMENTALISM. It would do you good to remember it and how it has worked to get us to this point.
We might try filing lawsuits against any and all Congresscritters and the Senate Snakes who pass these laws. Put in front of a friendly judge we could get faster repsonse time than from the aformentioned animals.
Working with them critters reminds me of BEGGING.
"Please give us our God-given rights back. Pretty Please with sugar on it."
LOL,
CATO
Oh, gee. In that case, vote for anti-gun politicians and hope they're lying. < extreme sarcasm >
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.