Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists Say Earth Formed Faster
Associated Press ^ | Wed Aug 28, 2:00 PM ET | RICK CALLAHAN

Posted on 08/29/2002 10:42:37 AM PDT by Junior

Scientists have found evidence that Earth made its final step to planet status about 30 million years earlier than previous research had suggested.

Working independently, two groups of scientists analyzed meteorites that contain telltale clues about planetary formation and compared them to rocks from Earth.

Both teams reached the same conclusion: Earth's metallic core formed about 30 million years after the solar system's birth.

The findings contrast with 1995 research that suggested Earth's core formed about 60 million years after the sun condensed at the center of a swirling disc of gas and dust. The new date pinpoints the approximate time that Earth had nearly reached its current mass.

David Stevenson, a professor of planetary sciences at Cal Tech in Pasadena, Calif., said the new analyses fit well with current theoretical ideas about the pace of Earth's formation.

Stevenson, who wasn't involved with the research, said the new calculations give an approximate date for when Earth's metallic core finished separating from its silicate-based mantle. That event is considered the last major event of Earth's formation.

The research, which appears in Thursday's issue of the journal Nature, was done by a German team and Harvard University researchers who collaborated with French scientists.

Stevenson said the fact that the two groups of scientists reached the same results increases the weight of the findings.

The new date for Earth's core was reached through a series of complex calculations of the ratios of the radioactive elements hafnium and tungsten found in primitive chondrite meteorites left over from the solar system's formation.

These meteorites provide a baseline for determining the age of planetary cores because they come from planetary bodies that never formed a core, said Thorsten Kleine of the University of Munster in Germany, who led the German team.

Those results were then compared with rocks from the Earth, Mars and meteorites believed to have originated on the large asteroid Vesta, yielding evidence that each was older than previous estimates.

"Generally speaking this means that all of the planets, not just the Earth, formed much faster than we had assumed," Kleine said.

The refined figures yielded a precise date — 4.530 billion years ago — that marks Earth's unofficial status as a planet, he said.

The findings also push back the origin of Earth's moon because most scientists believe the moon formed from material ejected when a Mars-sized planet collided with the proto-Earth, Kleine said.

Geologist Alex N. Halliday, whose 1995 research produced the figure that Earth formed about 60 million years after the solar system's birth, said his team apparently made an error in one if its measurements.

"We do not have a clear explanation for the apparent error in our ... data at this time," Halliday, of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, said via e-mail message.

___

On the Net:

Nature: http://www.nature.com</a


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: crevolist; earth; xplanets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last

1 posted on 08/29/2002 10:42:37 AM PDT by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *crevo_list; VadeRetro; PatrickHenry; longshadow; dubyagee; Alamo-Girl
Bump.
2 posted on 08/29/2002 10:44:42 AM PDT by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Junior
Keep Trying.
3 posted on 08/29/2002 10:45:10 AM PDT by Noslrac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: Noslrac
Keep Trying.

Okay ... I think ...

5 posted on 08/29/2002 10:48:56 AM PDT by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SteveGrimmett
My Bible tells me all I need to know about how we got here, and that's that.

What chapter and verse does this "7000 year" age occur in?

6 posted on 08/29/2002 10:49:02 AM PDT by Cincinatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Junior
meteorites believed to have originated on the large asteroid Vesta

Those who have a problem with Martian meteorites are going to be skeptically blue with disbelief over Vestal meteorites.

7 posted on 08/29/2002 10:49:42 AM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Junior
Amazing that they know what went on so long ago, just with a few rocks and chemicals they somehow can reel off 4 billion years.How do they check their work?
8 posted on 08/29/2002 10:50:43 AM PDT by claptrap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveGrimmett
This ain't got anything to do with Darwinism. If you and yours choose to ignore science, that's all well and good.
9 posted on 08/29/2002 10:51:06 AM PDT by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: claptrap
How do they check their work?

That's what peer-review is for.

10 posted on 08/29/2002 10:52:29 AM PDT by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: claptrap
Amazing that they know what went on so long ago, just with a few rocks and chemicals they somehow can reel off 4 billion years.How do they check their work?

Creationists have predicted (and this article supports the prediction) that the more complex life is discovered to be, the older the universe, earth and "first appearances" of life will become according to evos.

11 posted on 08/29/2002 10:55:24 AM PDT by Dataman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Junior
This comment was directed toward the scientists. They have no clue. Basically taking a shot in the dark.
12 posted on 08/29/2002 10:58:35 AM PDT by Noslrac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer; Scully; Piltdown_Woman; general_re; Doctor Stochastic; Sabertooth; aBootes
elderly earth ping!
13 posted on 08/29/2002 11:03:31 AM PDT by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Junior
If you and yours choose to ignore science, that's all well and good.

He and his signed on today. Methinks you are arguing with a troll.

14 posted on 08/29/2002 11:06:33 AM PDT by TN4Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: claptrap
How do they check their work on earth's early days? It's easy. They ask Strom Thurmond.
15 posted on 08/29/2002 11:07:42 AM PDT by Our man in washington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TN4Liberty; Junior
I agree. See his 'find in forum' page...
16 posted on 08/29/2002 11:12:11 AM PDT by dubyagee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Junior
I took the comment as sarcasm.
17 posted on 08/29/2002 11:14:43 AM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Noslrac
This comment was directed toward the scientists. They have no clue.

To make a statement like that, you must be inimately familiar with this piece of work. What is the flaw you've uncovered?

18 posted on 08/29/2002 11:17:49 AM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Junior
Thank you so much for the heads up!

I'm hoping the NASA Genesis Project will have more to add in the next few years.

I am a Christian fundamentalist (one who believes the Bible is the inerrant Word of God.) And, due to the workings of space/time and inflation, I am not at all alarmed by these enormous ages.

Lurking Christian fundamentalists might find these links interesting:

Age of the Universe

Special Relativity - Spacetime Wheel

A Spacetime Map of the Universe


19 posted on 08/29/2002 11:17:53 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SteveGrimmett; Admin Moderator
Are you still here? Don't worry, the mods will discover you're a disruptor soon enough. Taking a look at the whole of your posts will see to that...
20 posted on 08/29/2002 11:18:16 AM PDT by truenospinzone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson