Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gore says Saddam "must be removed from power" (June 2000)
Associated Press ^ | June 26, 2000 | Sandra Sobieraj

Posted on 08/29/2002 8:39:36 PM PDT by zapiks44

By SANDRA SOBIERAJ, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - Vice President Al Gore (news - web sites) told Iraqi opposition leaders Monday that Saddam Hussein stands in the way of Middle East peace and ``must be removed from power.''

``I believe that there can be no peace for the Iraqi people and a genuine peace for the people of the Middle East so long as Saddam is in a position to brutalize his people and threaten his neighbors,'' Gore told representatives of forces trying to topple the Iraqi president.

The Democratic presidential candidate was showcasing his foreign policy responsibilities as vice president Monday - experience his campaign says makes him better prepared to be president than his Republican opponent, Texas Gov. George W. Bush (news - web sites).

Immediately after meeting with the Iraqis, Gore shifted gears for talks and an official dinner with Armenian President Robert Kocharyan, whom Gore saluted for showing ``true statesmanship in reaching out to the people of Azerbaijan.'' The two nations have a lingering dispute over independence claims by Nagorno-Karabakh, which is controlled by Armenia but is located within Azerbaijan.

Ahmad Chalabi, leader of the Iraqi National Congress, was among the nine Iraqi opposition figures seated with Gore around a circular conference table at the State Department. Other groups represented at the session, which was open to reporters only for a quick photo and Gore's introductory remarks, included the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan, the Kurdish Democratic Party and the Constitutional Monarchist Movement.

The United States ``will not flag in supporting your efforts,'' Gore said, and will continue to enforce the ``no-fly zones'' over southern and northern Iraq that Americans and their allies have patrolled to prevent Saddam from threatening citizens - particularly the Kurds - in these regions.

``In the interests of regional peace and for the sake of human decency,

(Saddam) must be removed from power. That is the policy of this administration. It is the policy I support. It is the policy I am personally committed to,'' Gore said.

A senior State Department official said after the half-hour meeting that, because it was not a campaign event, Gore did not speak ``in terms of a Gore presidency.''

The meeting made good on Gore's promise to American Jewish activists on May 23 that he would encourage Iraqi opposition leaders to unite in their efforts.

In March, Chalabi's group received $265,000 in economic support funds, marking the United States' first direct grant to aid Saddam's overthrow. Congress appropriated $8 million late last year for this purpose, plus $97 million in surplus Pentagon equipment provided under the Iraqi Liberation Act signed by President Clinton. The United States also has accepted 145 Iraqis for non-military training, including field medicine, transport and communications, under the legislation.

Saddam and U.S. concerns that he will build weapons of mass destruction are a leftover problem from George Bush's presidency and the Persian Gulf War. Gore is constrained from making Iraq much of an issue in the presidential campaign against Bush's son because the Clinton-Gore administration has little to show for its own efforts against Saddam.

The administration launched punishing air raids on Baghdad in December 1998 but failed to force Saddam to cooperate with United Nations weapons inspectors, who have yet to return to Iraq.

Getting the inspectors back in was not discussed Monday because it fell ``outside the scope of this discussion,'' the State Department official said on condition that he not be identified. As to whether Saddam's ouster was any closer to realization now than last year, this official said: ``We're certainly a year closer. No one has a deadline.''

U.N. sanctions imposed for Iraq's 1990 invasion of Kuwait aren't to be lifted until U.N. inspectors certify Iraq no longer has or can produce weapons of mass destruction.

Also Monday, the Gore campaign said it hired Nashville, Tenn., businesswoman Cindy Wall to direct outreach to women voters. Polls have shown Gore having trouble among women, who came out for the 1996 Clinton-Gore ticket in decisive numbers. Last week, Gore's vice presidential office brought on Alvin Brown to help with outreach to black voters.


TOPICS: Extended News; Free Republic; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: algore; saddamhussein
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Hmmmm... where was all the media hysteria when Gore was saying Saddam should be ousted?
1 posted on 08/29/2002 8:39:36 PM PDT by zapiks44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: zapiks44
Great find.

Only one question: who is Gore?

2 posted on 08/29/2002 8:41:30 PM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zapiks44
Of course when Saddam is removed, Al Gore will say, "See, I also supported removing Saddam."
3 posted on 08/29/2002 8:44:35 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton
AL Gore - Supossed creator of the Internet (HA) and the biggest idiot to come out of Tenneessee.
4 posted on 08/29/2002 8:46:48 PM PDT by scab4faa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: zapiks44
The Democratic presidential candidate was showcasing his foreign policy responsibilities as vice president Monday ...

Dear Al,


5 posted on 08/29/2002 8:47:14 PM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zapiks44
Gore, you and Slick had your chance, and you sat on your hands, while Dr. SadMan went back to his lab to see how his manical creations were progressing. Talk is cheap, and 3 dollar Bill, and his side kick AlGore, were the cheapest talkers I've ever seen. But boy could they talk.
6 posted on 08/29/2002 8:51:35 PM PDT by Russell Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scab4faa; phasma proeliator
I consider it extremely ironic, considering Gore and an old college body named Frankenstein invented Saddam....
7 posted on 08/29/2002 8:51:43 PM PDT by da_toolman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: zapiks44
Better late than never.
8 posted on 08/29/2002 8:52:23 PM PDT by A CA Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zapiks44
He must have read a Poll, and now is trying to change his stripes as usual.

Well, we're ON to him, and he stinks...just like the SKUNK he is.
9 posted on 08/29/2002 9:02:00 PM PDT by PoorMuttly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zapiks44
IMHO, this only makes the administration look even more foolish for wanting to "go it alone".

It wouldn't bother me at all to see Saddam Hussein get vaporized by a nuke.
But I haven't seen any evidence that would warrant such an attack.
If they merely want to oust a tyranous dicatator, we should practice on Fidel Castro and liberate Cuba. It's closer to home and should be easier to accomplish on our own.

10 posted on 08/29/2002 9:02:25 PM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Russell Scott
"Gore, you and Slick had your chance, and you sat on your hands, while Dr. SadMan went back to his lab to see how his manical...."

I believe you have them mixed up with GW's Daddy - and believe me it is the same DNA - unfortunately.
11 posted on 08/29/2002 9:03:24 PM PDT by SEGUET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
IMHO, this only makes the administration look even more foolish for wanting to "go it alone".

Hey if numbnuts wants to go it alone fine then. Strap a nuke to his @ss and send him over, win/win situation.

A senior State Department official said after the half-hour meeting that, because it was not a campaign event, Gore did not speak ``in terms of a Gore presidency.''

Gore Presidency??? That would be a sad, sad day for America.

The administration launched punishing air raids on Baghdad in December 1998 but failed to force Saddam to cooperate with United Nations weapons inspectors, who have yet to return to Iraq.

But it did help cover up that Cuban incident of Bubba Clinton's (Down Monica!)

12 posted on 08/29/2002 9:23:09 PM PDT by scab4faa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Gore was simply following the strategy that was used by his boss in Kosovo. Create a legacy for yourself by holding up some third-rate dictator as an evil villain and proposing to oust him.

Never mind that this dictator has a military force that wouldn't even stand up to the Ohio National Guard, let alone the U.S. military. Just get rid of him.

13 posted on 08/29/2002 9:58:18 PM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All
Now we KNOW for certain that Gore is running for Prez again. Everyone knows that President Gore would be sniffing the European Union's you-know-what at this point. Heck, we might actually be a member of the EU itself if Big Al was presently in the Oval. But Gore, ole buddy, ole pal, the next time you go up against Bush, he will be an incumbent in wartime, so the equation has changed. He won't listen. Like Elvis, every time he passes a mirror, he has to stop and admire what he sees. Good for us that the American people will not give him anywhere near the vote he got in 2000. Were it not for last minute election surprises, (remember the 11th hour DUI charge, and that from over 25 years ago, and even that only for driving too slow?). No Al, get used to retirement. Squeeze on Tipper a couple of times for me, would 'ya buddy???
14 posted on 08/29/2002 10:04:45 PM PDT by Malcolm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: zapiks44
Hmmmm... where was all the media hysteria when Gore was saying Saddam should be ousted?

Back during Desert Storm, let us never forget that Al Gore bartered for television face time. He would support the war if he got a lot of face time. He would oppose the war otherwise. He used THAT to decide which way he would vote. Our troops were nothing but pawns for his political ambitions. The higher purpose of national sovereignty and world stability meant nothing to him. It was all him. Scary to think he was so close to being elected president.

Freegards....

15 posted on 08/30/2002 1:43:38 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SEGUET
I believe you have them mixed up with GW's Daddy - and believe me it is the same DNA - unfortunately.

Did you get lost on your way to DU again, dear? You really should bookmark it ya know...

16 posted on 08/30/2002 6:30:41 AM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Russell Scott
Gore, you and Slick had your chance, and you sat on your hands, while Dr. SadMan went back to his lab to see how his manical creations were progressing. Talk is cheap, and 3 dollar Bill, and his side kick AlGore, were the cheapest talkers I've ever seen. But boy could they talk.

I'll call it a perfect summary.

17 posted on 08/30/2002 8:50:43 PM PDT by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: He Rides A White Horse
What's interesting here is that Gore is speaking for the administration...no squawk..

Cheney gave a dissertation on Saddam the other day...The Press "Anal ysts" went nuts as to whether he was speaking for the President...It's kinda like a duh in this administration as this President is daily At his desk talking with his staff, not under his desk...

The press sure has its agenda layed out!!

Thank God for Fox!!

Sac

18 posted on 08/31/2002 2:33:20 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: zapiks44
The Democratic presidential candidate

Which one?

Alpha male?

Formal (empty) suit and tie?

Business casual?

Clean-shaven?

Goatee-adorned?

With airbrushed "enhancements"?

pfehhhh......

19 posted on 08/31/2002 2:37:04 PM PDT by NorCoGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
If they merely want to oust a tyranous dicatator, we should practice on Fidel Castro and liberate Cuba. It's closer to home and should be easier to accomplish on our own.

If sugar and tobacco got better mileage than gasoline, Castro would have been toast in 1961.

20 posted on 08/31/2002 2:38:55 PM PDT by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson