Skip to comments.
The tower 'jumpers' were murdered
The Irish Independent ^
| September 8, 2002
| Declan McCormack
Posted on 09/08/2002 7:16:48 AM PDT by aculeus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 next last
To: Behind Liberal Lines
When I think of the jumpers I wonder why we simply haven't nuked the entire midEast yet.Mmmm, maybe because there are many people there who are no more guilty of their government's policies then the jumpers were of their government's policies?
Sorry, did I just violate one of the posting rules?
61
posted on
09/08/2002 6:07:47 PM PDT
by
inquest
To: mountaineer
>>>>>>The Saudi monarchy might hate such an emergence of democratic and representative government in its wretchedly ill-ruled region, but Washington understandably cares less and less for the concerns of a dubious ally whose nationals formed the bulk of the Sept. 11 terrorists.>>>>>>>
This is quite clear...it was a Saudi invasion... We will never forget.....
To: inquest
Maybe I am misunderstanding you, but are you insinuating that our government's policies brought on these attacks?
To: Senator_Palpatine
When I see pictures of people falling from the towers I cannot help but remember the words of another soldier who took up the sword against so called "peaceful" terrorists.
"KILL THEM ALL. NITS MAKE LICE".
To: inflorida
I'm saying that regardless of whether or not our government's policies towards the region were ethical (and I would say there are legitimate criticisms that can be made of it), it did not in any way justify the murder of innocent civilians on Sept. 11. My point is that likewise, those attacks do not justify any retaliatory murder of innocent civilians elsewhere.
I want to see the organizers and perpetrators of the attack killed, preferably painfully, along with all others who might be planning similar or worse atrocities against us. I'm asking that people acknowledge, at least in principle, the difference between guilt and innocence.
65
posted on
09/09/2002 6:33:47 AM PDT
by
inquest
To: inquest
I'm saying that regardless of whether or not our government's policies towards the region were ethical (and I would say there are legitimate criticisms that can be made of it), it did not in any way justify the murder of innocent civilians on Sept. 11. Another self righteous type taking an understandable expression of emotion as an opportunity to either a)flog their ideological opposition or b)demonstrate their superior intellect. Disgusting.
66
posted on
09/09/2002 8:18:40 AM PDT
by
skeeter
To: inquest
My point is that likewise, those attacks do not justify any retaliatory murder of innocent civilians elsewhere. If, in targeting terrorists, some innocent civilians die (as they've done in Afghanistan), then the fault for that lies with the government that harbors terrorists.
Wringing our hands over a few dead innocents when our very survival is at stake is out of proportion, it seems to me.
As far as innocents are concerned, we do what we can. As far as terrorists are concerned, we do what we MUST!
67
posted on
09/09/2002 8:31:19 AM PDT
by
sinkspur
To: aculeus
If nothing else, this article brings to my heart the dire need to make not just the murderers of the Middle East pay, but to make those of our own nation who shamelessly, brainlessly, and (above all) gutlessly open their pathetic bleeding hearts in support of the poor, defenseless BIN LADENITES whom our own "Great Satan" government appears to want to harm over something it brought on itself!
The Commiecrat Liberals who sympathize with and offer justification for the Jihad, and who blame their own United States of America, deserve the most gruesome deaths of all of those we dish it out to over this attrocity. THEY, are the Great Satan!!!
To: inquest
maybe [we simply haven't nuked the entire midEast yet] because there are many people there who are no more guilty of their government's policies then the jumpers were of their government's policies?Under your logic, as there are people in every nation whom "are no more guilty of their government's policies then the jumpers were of their government's policies," we shouldn't bomb any nation that attacks us (or harbors a terrorist group that attacks us)?
To: skeeter
Another self righteous type taking an understandable expression of emotion as an opportunity to either a)flog their ideological opposition or b)demonstrate their superior intellect. Disgusting.Or how 'bout c)speak up for innocents. Obviously somebody's gotta do it around here. And I don't have any problem at the expressions of rage. I just want the rage to be directed at the right targets. What's so disgusting about that?
70
posted on
09/09/2002 10:55:10 AM PDT
by
inquest
To: sinkspur
As far as innocents are concerned, we do what we can. As far as terrorists are concerned, we do what we MUST!I agree with that sentiment completely. It's just that the poster I was responding to seemed to actually want to target civilians.
71
posted on
09/09/2002 10:59:29 AM PDT
by
inquest
To: aristeides
"Jumping under these circumstances is not suicide. When you know you're going to die whatevery you do, you have the right to choose the least painful way to die."Yep. 9-11: never forget.
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Under your logic, as there are people in every nation whom "are no more guilty of their government's policies then the jumpers were of their government's policies," we shouldn't bomb any nation that attacks us (or harbors a terrorist group that attacks us)?Not indiscriminately. I agree there are certain things we have to do. Nuking isn't one of them - and certainly not nuking the entire region. That's nothing but a feel-good option that would be completely bereft of any sort of moral principle. Sorry if I'm delving into abstract concepts here, but such things mean something to me and to plenty of other Americans too.
73
posted on
09/09/2002 11:04:53 AM PDT
by
inquest
To: Iwentsouth
"What a pointless article. Or a braindead writer."...Or a member of the leftist "intellectual elite", which is redundant.
To: aculeus
And the solution?
More Tolerance, Diversity and Muslim Immigration.
To: inquest
I must admit that my "nuke" comment was more an expression of frustration than a serious foreign policy suggestion. However, I think you are being overly generous in spirit to the "civilian" population of these countries and whether they share their leaders' views. There has been plenty of coverage over the years of how the rank and file are taught, through religion and otherwise, to hate America with a passion.
To: mware
I never read such a heart rendering story in my life. The excerpt that you published fails to say if she survived or not. Her injuries sounded like she did not, but I was wondering if she made it or not.
To: aculeus
The law considers this murder. Its called a depraved-heart homicide, when the actions of the perp drive the victim to suicide. Oh so knowledgable and sophisticated Europeans, particularly from another common law jurisdiction, should know this.
To: aristeides
Jumping under these circumstances is not suicide. When you know you're going to die whatevery you do, you have the right to choose the least painful way to die. Absolutely.
To: Paulus Invictus
We saw a similar nightmare in Sao Paulo Brazil in 1974 I saw that when I was twelve and will never forget it. The media did us a disservice in not showing people falling out of the building. (As long as they couldn't be identified by loved ones).
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson