Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraq 'will have nuclear bomb in months'
drudge report | today | By Katty Kay in Washington, Paul Martin and Melissa Kite

Posted on 09/15/2002 6:56:20 PM PDT by TheRedSoxWinThePennant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
what are we waiting for lets give him a 100 megaton one right now
1 posted on 09/15/2002 6:56:20 PM PDT by TheRedSoxWinThePennant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2
If he ever got one and used it, all the people saying there's no evidence he's got one will then say we caused him to use it.
2 posted on 09/15/2002 7:01:28 PM PDT by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2
Now,now, let's not go off half cocked like Tom Dasshole.
We need the voice of reason now more than ever, where is jimmy carter when you need him?
You don't see Hillery! beating her war drums do you?
Yes I now it's like thunder when she walks but that doesn't count.
I'm sure we haven't heard the last of Bill Clinton on this
either.
"Naah, I could have stopped him, we knew he was building all this stuff, but that dang Republican judiciary comittee just
kept my mind off the real danger to our great repository of
democrat donations, er I mean the US."
3 posted on 09/15/2002 7:02:10 PM PDT by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lasereye
If we don't take him out, those same people will be saying that the Bush Administration had ample warning and chose not to do anything, probably to protect Halliburton contracts or something.
4 posted on 09/15/2002 7:03:48 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
The problem is that once he gets it, we wont go near him. No one is going to send 100,000 troops against a nuke.

At the first sign of an attack, he will unleash it on Turkey or Tel Aviv, prompting such massive retaliation that no sane person would think of starting with him.

It becomes the ultimate sword of Damacles.
5 posted on 09/15/2002 7:06:09 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2
It's okay. We have nothing to worry about. Tom Dasshole assured us of this.
6 posted on 09/15/2002 7:06:57 PM PDT by tomahawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2
Let's cut to the chase. they probably already have these weapons. Why should I shut up when I'm in the target zone?

Sure I was shocked by the attack on the towers. What's next?

7 posted on 09/15/2002 7:11:53 PM PDT by Concentrate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2
That UN is one darn useful organization, I tell you. He has or is about to have a nuclear weapon. What do we do? Wring hands. Wait, I know! We'll pass a resolution and tell him he has to play nice! Yeah, that'll do it! And on the off-chance it doesn't, by golly we'll meet again in a few months or a year or so, and we'll pass ANOTHER resolution! That'll do it for SURE!

Amazing that such a mindset could actually exist but it is indeed the standard MO for much of the world.

MM

8 posted on 09/15/2002 7:23:59 PM PDT by MississippiMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMan
Sadaam can take Donahue's show and he'd have a bomb tomorrow.
9 posted on 09/15/2002 7:25:54 PM PDT by jraven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2
I'm sure this will be in the NY Times tomorrow...page A38.
10 posted on 09/15/2002 7:29:40 PM PDT by PianoMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jraven
You are funny.
11 posted on 09/15/2002 7:32:55 PM PDT by Rocko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tomahawk
It's okay. We have nothing to worry about. Tom Dasshole assured us of this.

And Graham of Florida said he's more concerned with Iran, so let's not get so excited over Iraq.

12 posted on 09/15/2002 7:36:45 PM PDT by OReilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jraven
LOL
13 posted on 09/15/2002 7:56:14 PM PDT by PianoMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2; Big Steve; deport; blackie; Deb; Salvation; Howlin; Wait4Truth; ...
Thanks for the post.When you combined this article based on the Times of London and the London Telegraph - it's truly frightening!
14 posted on 09/15/2002 8:06:51 PM PDT by Lady In Blue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2
Until now the Administration has shied away from linking Iraq to al-Qaeda, prompting widespread speculation that the US had no evidence of links between the two. Yesterday Dr Rice suggested that was not the case: “Iraq has clearly links with terrorism that would include al-Qaeda.”

I have always thought it was a little ridiculous for some of the keyboard warriors around here to be claiming that "there's no link between Iraq and Al Queda" based on what they "seen on TV."

Unless, of course, they have a top secret security clearance that chose for some reason not to reveal...

15 posted on 09/15/2002 8:47:45 PM PDT by copycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2
Could this be why other arab countries, like Saudi seem to be changing their minds & coming on board with us? They all know that a nuke in the Madmans hands is death for all of them!
16 posted on 09/15/2002 9:01:50 PM PDT by blondee123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt
It's going to be difficult if he has some nukes, no doubt about that. If he is producing them everywhere like a cottage industry there is no telling where they will turn up. Maybe he has 3 transport methods, missile, truck, and boat; stopping all that would be a problem. If he starts detonating them, how can he be stopped short of blasting everything inside Iraq? What a huge project that would be.
17 posted on 09/15/2002 9:04:51 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Concentrate
After 9-11, waking up to a nuke going off in New York, or DC, doesn't seem so farfetched.
18 posted on 09/15/2002 9:11:52 PM PDT by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
The UN should be notified of the plan for saturation bombing of Bagdad...The morning after.
19 posted on 09/15/2002 9:35:07 PM PDT by sleavelessinseattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sleavelessinseattle
Let the UN be notified of any heavy bombing the same way we will be notified. That is watching the cities of Iraq light up the night in Iraq. That is after our stealth bombers light up the Iraqi cities.

Notifiying the UN would be like telling Da$$hole or Leaky Leahy ahead of time that we planned to bomb on X date. They would phone Saddam as demand their last payments asap. What payments, the payments for delaying the US from taking out Saddam.
20 posted on 09/15/2002 10:46:28 PM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson