Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE DEMOCRAT PARTY IS BEYOND CORRUPT, IT'S ALSO EVIL WARNS JIM ROBINSON IN SCATHING ATTACK OF TRUTH
freerepublic ^ | 9/21/2002 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 09/21/2002 11:39:06 AM PDT by TLBSHOW

The Democrat Party is beyond corrupt, It's also evil.

And what is this evil that triumphs when good men do nothing? What are we really talking about here and is it worth fighting for? Is it worth turning our heads and allowing evil to continue on while we do nothing? (and I count voting for a third party candidate when knowing that he has absolutely no chance of defeating the Democrat, and worse, actually planning and hoping to knock out the Republican candidate who otherwise might have defeated the Democrat, as doing nothing).

Corruption is accepting campaign cash from the Chinese in exchange for military hardware. Corruption is accepting campaign cash as bribes from Indonesian power brokers, from Buddhist Monks, from corrupt corporate moguls. Corruption is defined by the myriad criminal acts and practices of the Clintons and the Gores and their corrupt Democrat minions.

Corruption is the land grabs, the power grabs, the gun grabs, the bribery, the shady deals, the high crimes and treason. Corruption is the theft of campaign dollars through forced labor union deductions. Corruption is the systematic indoctrination of several generations of our youth with socialist dogma via government school systems. Corruption is the removal of God from public life and substituting in the evil homosexual/feminist agenda and the destruction of moral society. Corruption is lying to the public about global warming and the selling of the Kyoto treaty. Corruption is giving up our national sovereignty to the United Nations. Corruption is the abuses of office, obstruction of justice, lying, perjury and subornation of perjury.

The Democrat Party is thoroughly corrupt. There is no question about that, but it's way beyond corrupt. It's also evil.

Waco was evil. The killing of innocent men, women, children and babies is evil. Torturing them for weeks on end, gassing them, and then burning them alive is pure evil. This was perpetrated by a corrupt and evil Democrat Administration and covered-up by corrupt and evil Democrat Congressmen and Senators, many of whom you are saying should be allowed to remain in office even today.

And as bad as that is, it pales in comparison to the Democrat government sanctioned and funded wholesale slaughter of the most innocent life of all, the murder of innocent human life in the womb. This is evil. Pure evil. And this evilness is openly perpetrated by a thoroughly corrupt and evil Democrat Party. The same corrupt and evil Democrat Congress and Judiciary whom you are now saying deserve to remain in office.

IMHO, allowing these Democrats to remain in power is aiding and abetting the corruption and treason, and is acting as an accessory before and after the fact to the murderers of innocent human life. Is doing nothing and allowing this evil to triumph evil itself?

I love my country. I love the Constitution. I love life. I love God. I know that the Democrats hate my country, hate the Constitution, hate God and hate human life. I see that the only Party capable of blocking and defeating the evil Democrats is the Republican Party. I see that many races are so close that as little as a one percent siphon of conservative votes to a third party could be the difference between success and failure. I see allowing a Democrat to remain in power when it could have been prevented as a triumph of evil.

JIM ROBINSON


TOPICS: Announcements; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; corrupt; corruption; democrats; election; evil; reno
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440 ... 1,041-1,056 next last
To: Jim Robinson
No B/S... you didn't answer the questions... where was the Republican controlled congress during the congressional hearings? Why didn't they get to the bottom of it? What good is a Republican controlled house if it does not uphold the law?
401 posted on 09/22/2002 1:42:31 PM PDT by Critter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW; Jim Robinson; .45MAN
"I love my country. I love the Constitution. I love life. I love God. I know that the Democrats hate my country, hate the Constitution, hate God and hate human life."

That's exactly why we're all here. Thank-you for giving us this forum. God Bless you, Free Republic and us all.

402 posted on 09/22/2002 1:43:59 PM PDT by dansangel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Burlem
"I think the term liberals should replace the term democrats, Zell Miller is a good example of a conservative democrat, John McCain is a liberal republican, which would you prefer?"

Your point is a good one, but I believe that the term "liberal" is too positive a label for leftwing Democrats. If someone who is not politically informed looks up the term "liberal" in the dictionary, they will find that its definition is something like "generous, open-minded," etc. -- clearly not descriptive of the beliefs or platform of the Democrat party.

The term we must use for them is "Socialist," since that is the clearest and most accurate description of their system of beliefs.

403 posted on 09/22/2002 1:46:26 PM PDT by NH Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Well, we can't vote them out if we don't try. Vote out as many RATs as we possibly can. Send the Republicans in with a conservative mandate. Call them, write them, visit them in their offices. Tell them what we want them to do when they get up there... and keep reminding them. Then, before the next primary, select the most conservative candidates you can possibly find and work for their campaigns. Convince as many people as possible to support and promote them. Get them nominated on the Republican ticket and then campaign like hell to get them elected. They can't do it without grass roots support.

404 posted on 09/22/2002 1:47:46 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 399 | View Replies]

To: Critter
How the hell would I know? They don't call him "slick" for nothing. Bill and Hillary along with General "Stonewall" Reno and a thoroughly corrupt Justice Department and FBI successfully covered it up. You want to find out? Dig up Vince Foster and ask him. That slick little stunt probably zipped quite a few lips forever. The Democrats are scum! Don't let it happen again. Vote the RATs out and keep them out!
405 posted on 09/22/2002 1:53:03 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
So you are saying that if the terrorists come to this country legally than it is ok for them to blow stuff up?
406 posted on 09/22/2002 1:55:28 PM PDT by gunshy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: NH Liberty
If Miller was a true conservative, he would change parties. There is absolutely zero chance that a true conservative would remain with the party of slime, corruption, cowardice and abortion. He may be less liberal than your average Democrat, but he is no conservative. If he was, he'd switch.
407 posted on 09/22/2002 1:58:28 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
The Republicans are much closer to my beliefs than the Democrats. Smaller government, cut taxes, cut spending, strong military, individual rights, pro-gun, pro-life.

Nice, very nice. So would someone tell this to Liddy Dole, who is running nonstop commercials here in North Carolina boasting that she'll keep propping up Social Security, which is and always has been socialist, big-government largesse at its WORST! Not to mention her wishy-washy stand on the right to bear arms.

That ain't "conservative" or "Republican", Jim. REAL conservatism is having the guts to tell people they're shackled to government. Not pull the blinds over them like "big government liberals" do.

Jim, to insist that it's "conservative vs. liberal"/"Democrat vs. Republican" is not only myopic and shallow, it's dangerous, because those are just distractions from the real cancer eating away at America. There are those of us who believe in the sovereignty of the individual, that God entrusted America to her people. And then there are statists: the ones who demand that America is no greater than her government. There are no citizens under statists, only subjects.

The Democratic and Republican parties, both of them, are statist. And both parties love their power too much to effect anything that would cede more power to the individual. If President Bush had an overwhelming majority in both the House and Senate, nothing notable would change in America, and it's naive to believe that the Republicans would do anything different than the Democrats... 'cuz BOTH rely on as many people as possible on the government dole to stay in power.

408 posted on 09/22/2002 1:59:09 PM PDT by Darth Sidious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 398 | View Replies]

To: Critter
Iwish I had said what you said. Well done.
409 posted on 09/22/2002 2:03:02 PM PDT by gunshy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies]

To: Darth Sidious
You guys that are out of mainstream need a plan. The plan I suggest is try to get some libertarian leaning types to win in heavily GOP districts, who can then survive the general election (in more marginal districts, they would just flip to the Dems). Then they will have a platform to promulgate their views without being totally ignored. All other paths are doomed to failure, other than moving mainstream views in general without politicians doing it from a visible platform. When that guy from that heavily GOP CD district in NC retires (the one from the mountains), that might be a time to make your move. Then your guys can duke it out with my RINO Neocon guys. I would look forward to the debate. Cheers.
410 posted on 09/22/2002 2:04:55 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 408 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
You really did change your registration didn't you? LOL. One tends to find true believers more from converts than those with hereditary links, at least if we two are micro samples that can be generalized. Cheers.
411 posted on 09/22/2002 2:09:58 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 407 | View Replies]

To: Darth Sidious
The name came to me. The Ballinger district.
412 posted on 09/22/2002 2:12:04 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 408 | View Replies]

To: Darth Sidious
Hey, this is also the real world. SS has been and will remain for quite some time the third rail of politics. Touch it, you die. This one will have to be removed by the grass roots and it's gonna take time and an awful lot of hard work to get it done. The Democrats have held power for way too many years of the last century. They've completely corrupted our educations systems and brainwashed the populace. It's been a hundred years of Democrat rule and socialist indoctrination. It may take a hundred years to undo it.

By the way, I hope all of you in NC are writing and calling daily to remind Dole that we need a conservative in that seat. But whatever else we do, we need a Republican majority. We cannot afford to allow the Senate the power to block Bush's judiciary appointments, especially at the Supreme Court level.

There is absolutely zero excuse for anyone who claims to be conservative to not vote Republican this time around. There is way too much at stake to risk allowing the Democrats control of the House or Senate.

Vote out the RATs!

413 posted on 09/22/2002 2:13:22 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 408 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
They've completely corrupted our educations systems and brainwashed the populace. It's been a hundred years of Democrat rule and socialist indoctrination. It may take a hundred years to undo it.

As I see it, this is should be conservatives' primary battleground. The culture needs to be changed fairly significantly before conservatives can hope to make real inroads at the federal level.

414 posted on 09/22/2002 2:19:34 PM PDT by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Regarding SS privitization, what happens to folks who blow their money on unsound investments, or the stock market tanks, and they retire with nothing? Is telling them to go to church soup kitchens really a sustainable policy? Isn't there a moral hazard problem here? The idea in the end is a dead end in my opinion. It fails when one parses the details, particularly as a sustainable political policy. Just a thought.

By the way, I have yet to read one post on FR that old poor folks with no assets should have to fend for themselves. Not one. Interesting.

415 posted on 09/22/2002 2:21:01 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies]

To: independentmind
That's my feeling too. It's going to take a sea change in popular opinion to make the big differences. And that starts with education and the media in general. Tough job. Looks like the entire world is going socialist. We're holding out, but just barely. The Constitution is in tatters, but it's still hanging in there. But if Hillary & Co and their RATs get their way, they'll rip out the final threads and we'll be following right along with Canada, Europe and the UK. Socialism R Us. Just look what "Gay" Davis is doing to us here in California.

Vote the RATs out. It's more important than ever.

416 posted on 09/22/2002 2:29:13 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 414 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Hey, this is also the real world. SS has been and will remain for quite some time the third rail of politics. Touch it, you die. This one will have to be removed by the grass roots and it's gonna take time and an awful lot of hard work to get it done.

It'll take a helluva lot more than mere "hard work". I (and no doubt you) know plenty of people who, whenever I bring up how the government has stolen their freedom through Social Security, they go wild-eyed apoplectic about how the government is going to fund their retirement. Bring up that there likely WON'T be any funding 'cuz it's running out: "well, they'd BETTER because I've been paying into it all these years."

There's no way in hell that the government is going to let Social Security lapse, 'cuz there'd be blood and riots in the streets if it did. They've no choice but to keep propping it up, with no hope of weaning Americans off it. Hard work? Yeah... but it'll also take just about every single Social Security recipient falling into the wretched earth to rot.

The Democrats have held power for way too many years of the last century. They've completely corrupted our educations systems and brainwashed the populace.

And if Bush (or any other Republican president) wants to cut out the heartmeat of this problem in one fell swoop, he(she?) will eliminate the Department of Education. LBJ started it... I see no reason why any president could not abolish it unilaterally. Once that's done, restoring local control to the schools will be far easier accomplished.

(And on this one, I'm 100% in agreement with you Jim. I'm teaching in a private school now... and it's light years removed from what goes on philosophically in the public systems.)

It's been a hundred years of Democrat rule and socialist indoctrination. It may take a hundred years to undo it.

It won't begin in the schools. It'll begin in the homes, in the families. Two things brought down the Soviet Union: Reagan's SDI (which bankrupted the Soviets when they tried to compete) and the young people who, despite every effort by the Soviet officials, in blatant violation of Leninist doctrine, grew up and came of age with, more often than not, a profound faith in God.

How'd that happen? The kids went to school and were told there's no God. They came back home and their grandparents told them there was God.

I'll agree with you again, then, with this caveat: in the culture war it's not Democrats that should be crushed, but political correctness. And if you or anyone else is serious about the Republicans providing capable service/leadership, you'd better hold their feet to the fire on this like nothing else.

By the way, I hope all of you in NC are writing and calling daily to remind Dole that we need a conservative in that seat. But whatever else we do, we need a Republican majority. We cannot afford to allow the Senate the power to block Bush's judiciary appointments, especially at the Supreme Court level.

If Bush's perogative is appointing strict Constitutionalists who believe in judicial restraint, I'll wish/pray him enough Senators to support him. But you gotta rely on Bush wanting that.

There is absolutely zero excuse for anyone who claims to be conservative to not vote Republican this time around. There is way too much at stake to risk allowing the Democrats control of the House or Senate.

Jim, people only take as much control as you're willing to give them. If government has become too overbearing in America (and it has), it's not the Democrats fault or the Republicans. It's ours. God never has and likely never will anoint a ruler over America. Instead, He did something that never happened before in the history of the world: He anointed all of us, as citizens, to govern ourselves. There's never been a time that we couldn't take back control of our own destiny... but we have to want that first, and not be mesmerized by the dog-and-pony show that both major parties are expecting us to buy into.

417 posted on 09/22/2002 2:44:45 PM PDT by Darth Sidious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Number one, eliminate the income tax (and the SS tax) and implement an excise tax as the founders intended. This will allow us to decide for ourselves how much tax we want to send to the government and when we want to send it. Also, will automatically put a limit on the tax rates and therefor the government spending rates. Now, instead of sending the feds our money through forced payroll deductions, we can control it ourselves and decide how to invest it. And obviously, cutting taxes and cutting government spending will spur capital development, opportunity, and the economy in general. Reagan was right.

Number two, education is key.

"A fool and his money are soon parted."

I doubt much emphasis is placed on this simple truth any longer. Our children are taught to be dependent on government. They're taught to be socialist workers. Self-reliance, entrepranuership and individualism is discouraged. Future generations need to be taught to fend for themselves. And they will do fine if allowed to. Of course, this should be taught at home too, but it'll help if our education systems don't preach socialism and dependence.

418 posted on 09/22/2002 2:45:08 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 415 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Yes, well on the mind thing, I know we both agree on schools vouchers, and consider that a primary issue. I noticed however you did not address head on the impecunious old folk issue, which was what I was focusing on.
419 posted on 09/22/2002 2:47:50 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: Critter
Actually, it was the House that impeached Clinton, and some -- Henry Hyde, Helen Chent???? -- at real personal sacrifice.

Almost all GOP senators voted to remove convict Slick.

420 posted on 09/22/2002 3:04:34 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440 ... 1,041-1,056 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson