HOLLYWOOD STARS DEFEND PRO-LIFE VIEWS ON TV TALK SHOWS

Lifesite.org ^ | Thursday October 3, 2002

[wardaddy]

Pro-Life Bump.......and she's Patriotic as well! Wonderful Woman!

[SevenofNine]

Nick I saw Kathy Ireland actually there another pro life actress in Hollywood too

Kate Mulgrew aka Capt Kathyan Janaway from Star Trek Voyager

You be shock to find out that Hollywood aging bad boys Warren Beatty and King of LA Lakers fans Jack Nicholson are pro life

Jack always been pro life

Warren came to issue little late after birth of his children

[wardaddy]

If Nicholson is pro-life....one has to wonder how many unkown little Jacks there are running around...

[xp38]

[Sgt_Schultze]

Thanks for posting a photo of a woman who should be the face of the pro-life movement. Here is a gift for you - the face of the anti-life movement...

[glory]

Yes she is. She said so on Dennis Prager's radio show yesterday. Registered Repub no less.

[SevenofNine]

Actually official I think Jack has tribe

He has daughter from long ago marriage

He had son from actress who appear with him Five Easy pieces

Don't forget two little ones with Rebecca

I seen son from Rebecca at Lakers game with Jack

You know how much impassive basketball fan he is

[glory]

shudder...what a contrast huh?

[wardaddy]

4?...then I too have a tribe..lol.....but I'm no Jack.

[nickcarraway]

Drudge ran something about Beatty, when he was considering running for president.

[AnnaZ]

HEATON: Yes, I've thought about it. On a personal level, as a Christian, it will not be Barbra Streisand I'm standing in front of when I have to make an accounting of my life.

 

That is too fantastic of a response. God bless you, Patricia.

 

[Paul Atreides]

That will come as a severe shock to Bardra.

[SevenofNine]

Nick you are correct I think Drudge ran it back during election I THINK Not sure
I remember hearing that

[quietolong]

It's a 1...2...3...Whata we fighting for...

[Askel5]

Ireland did a bang-up job as well.

"Refute me ..."

And no one can.

[FreeReign]

IRELAND: Is it all right for the government to allow the murder of an innocent human being? The evidence I see tells me the unborn is a human being. From the moment of conception, a new life comes into being with a complete genetic blueprint. The sex is determined. The blood type is determined.

She's got it all!

[aruanan]

Bless their hearts!

[dsutah]

You know, I read that also, in a magazine somewhere, that J. Nickleson was pro-life. Warren Beatty just recently told Matt Drudge(I think) that he was too. Another person that is, is one of the recent presidents of Ireland(definitely NOT Mary Robinson!).

This pres. is a female, and a feminist! I can't think of her name. There are also some in the British Parliament that are. There may be more somewhere, but I can't think of them, except for Charleton Heston.

[jennyp]

"Refute me ..."

And no one can.

I've heard her on the issue before. She's definitely an intelligent lady. When she starts pondering what defines the end of a human life, and why she considers a person on life support whose brain is completely dead but whose body is still alive from the neck down is not a "living person" but is in fact a "dead body", and what that implies about the beginning of a person's life, she is going to be in for quite a shock! At that point I have faith that she'll accept that she has just refuted herself. (at least partially.)

[Askel5]

At that point I have faith that she'll accept that she has just refuted herself. (at least partially.)

And I have faith her objectivity will become more consistent and she will apply the strictest of scientific proofs and refuse to base her thoughts on the artificial realities which have come about by virtue of predators' and profiteers' playing on the desperation of the dying and the hopes of their loved ones where the artificial and inhuman prolonging of life and preventing of natural death are concerned.

(Which "humanitarian" life-saving attempts are going to become extremely rare extremely soon -- save for the very rich -- now that we've milked the situation for all it's worth and stand at the threshhold of creating and cloning human life strictly for parts and other "destructive" research purposes.)

Personally, I see no point in ARTIFICIALLY prolonging life just so one can point at the ARTIFICIALLY sustained body and use it to found one's arguments about brain death ... which arguments will pave the way for using the dying as human mulch every bit as callously as we use the unborn.

I find it just as duplicitous and morally offensive as the use of ARTIFICIAL conception and the use of the inevitable "Excess" ARTIFICIALLY conceived lives as foundation for the argument that we must make "best use" of these "Excess" human lives that are fit only for the garbage otherwise.