Really? Then who sent this letter, which held a sample of anthrax "ground to a microscopic fineness not achieved by U.S. biological-weapons experts"?
Posted on 10/08/2002 1:02:41 PM PDT by Asmodeus
WASHINGTON –– Saddam Hussein's apparent policy of not resorting to terrorist attacks against the United States could change if he concludes a U.S.-led attack against him was inevitable, CIA Director George Tenet said as President's Bush bid for congressional support to use force hit a snag in the Senate.
Tenet, in a letter read before a joint hearing of the House and Senate intelligence committees Tuesday, said that "Baghdad for now appears to be drawing a line short of conducting terrorist attacks with conventional or chemical or biological weapons."
But Tenet went on to say that should Saddam conclude that a U.S.-led attack against his country could not be deterred, "he probably would become much less constrained in adopting terrorist action."
Both the House and the Senate were debating the Iraq war resolution.
But while it appeared to be clear sailing for the measure in the GOP-led House, Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., served notice on other Democrats at a party luncheon that he intended to use parliamentary tactics to delay a final vote, according to those who attended the session.
That could delay the vote well into next week, suggested Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-W.Va.
Byrd, widely respected for his deep knowledge of the Senate rules, has emerged as the primary Senate opponent to the president's war resolution.
The House began a fateful three-day debate on the measure on Tuesday. The Senate, which has been debating the measure since last Thursday, resumed its debate.
If forced into war, "We will prevail," President Bush told a Tennessee audience.
"At this moment, the people's house begins debate on one of the most difficult questions we will ever face," said Rep. David Dreier, R-Calif.
The House hoped to conclude by Thursday night. The measure before both chambers provides the president wide latitude to take military action to disarm Saddam of chemical, biological or nuclear weapons and, if possible, depose the Iraqi leader.
Anticipating an overwhelming vote of support in Congress, Bush told a Knoxville, Tenn., rally on Tuesday, "Military option is my last choice, the last choice. But should we commit our military, we'll be ready. We'll be prepared. We'll have a great plan and make no mistake about it, we will prevail."
Secretary of State Colin Powell, meeting with lawmakers on Capitol Hill, said the congressional resolution "will definitely strengthen my hand as I try to do the diplomatic work up in New York to get a United Nations Security Council resolution" requiring unimpeded weapons inspections in Iraq.
Powell said there was increasing support at the U.N. for a new inspections mandate. "All of my colleagues at the United Nations and others I've spoken to around the world clearly see the threat," he said.
At the Pentagon, a Defense Intelligence Agency official told reporters that Saddam is actively making biological and chemical weapons – and trying to hide that fact from the world.
Iraq is "taking steps to conceal sensitive equipment and documentation in anticipation of new inspections," John Yurechko said.
In a somber address to the nation Monday evening, Bush said the threat from Iraq was unique and imminent and there was no time to wait for final proof that Saddam had developed a nuclear capability – "the smoking gun – that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud."
"While there are many dangers in the world, the threat from Iraq stands alone because it gathers the most serious dangers of our age in one place," the president said.
Bush told a Cincinnati audience in his televised speech that Saddam was "a homicidal dictator who is addicted to weapons of mass destruction," and that if he succeeds in obtaining nuclear weapons to add to his biological and chemical stockpiles, he "would be in a position to blackmail anyone who opposes his aggression."
In Baghdad, the government of Iraq on Tuesday described Bush's speech as an attempt to justify an attack.
"The speech contained misleading information through which Bush is trying to justify an illogical and illegitimate attack on Iraq," said Foreign Minister Naji Sabri Sabri.
On Tuesday, a Pentagon official reiterated U.S. warnings that Iraqi military officers should refuse orders to use chemical or biological weapons. Any Iraqis involved in such attacks would be treated as war criminals after the conflict ended, said Douglas Feith, undersecretary for policy at the Defense Department.
The House has allotted 21 hours to debate what House International Relations Committee Chairman Henry Hyde, R-Ill., a chief sponsor of the White House-backed resolution, called "one of the most consequential questions we will deal with for years to come."
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
NOBODY let Hitler take Poland - Hitler took half of Poland without permission. Only that he was helped by Soviet Union - the power which later defeated him in the end. Saddam Hussein is not another second Hitler. At most he could be a second Ataturk if allowed to succeed.
If Saddam ever gets nukes he could match Hitlers death toll in a day.
Really? Then who sent this letter, which held a sample of anthrax "ground to a microscopic fineness not achieved by U.S. biological-weapons experts"?
And we are supposed to care about this?
folding to stealth blackmail
We folded in Eastern Europe in the Cold War and we will fold to some Islamic nuclear state before long. In a sense we have already folded to Pakistan.
It gets greater. Before Nix went to sleep we looked a little at the Fatemi connection.
Seems there is a whole Fatemi branch of the Byrdies. So this old KKK kingpin has a two-generation Arab side to the family tree :).
Mohammad Fatemi is into oil. His sons seems well connected in the military establishment. Just an example from Fredrik Fatemi's background:
Laser systems : Nd:YAG, excimer, and tunable OPO pulsed laser systems
He seems to have done a stint at Naval Research Laboratory.
Much more here.
Many, many ifs. But for certain he has a lot of oil!
Each time Byrd's name is mentioned, in print or speech, the truth about his KKK connection must be revealed!
I'd vote for you, PhilDragoo!
They are not exactly his personal residences - they are the government buildings - otherwise they would not be of interest for weapons instructors (in Iraq every second thing is "presidential"). It is not sure that they cost "billions" and who gives a hoot about starving children? Certainly not Madeleine Albright: "We Think the Price Is Worth It"
Either way, you are not proposing the war because of high price of government buildings?
Erma and I are the proud great-grandparents of little Caroline Byrd Fatemi. I married the former Erma Ora James, my high school sweetheart and a coal miner's daughter, and we are the parents of two daughters, Mrs. Mohammad (Mona Byrd) Fatemi and Mrs. Jon (Marjorie Byrd) Moore
SHAZAAAAMMM!! I honestly didn't know Byrd's son-in-law's name is Mohammad! Is this real???!! What?
If we want oil, why didn't we take it. We could have owned the middle east on numerous occassions and all their oil if that was our objective. I have never once heard a rationale arguement about oil. Just a bunch of mindless liberals spouting its all about the oil, but none of them know why except for some wild ass conspiracy theory that makes obsolutely no sense.
Hmm, really? Maybe it is because you did not listen, Mr Always Right? Please, I mean no offence, but I cannot resist a good pun :)
This is from the Byrd webpage!!: Erma and I are the proud great-grandparents of little Caroline Byrd Fatemi. I married the former Erma Ora James, my high school sweetheart and a coal miner's daughter, and we are the parents of two daughters, Mrs. Mohammad (Mona Byrd) Fatemi and Mrs. Jon (Marjorie Byrd) Moore
From the Byrd webpage?? Is he sypathetic to radical Islam???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.