Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Mummified" Dinosaur Discovered In Montana (pics included)
National Geographic News ^

Posted on 10/11/2002 1:04:43 AM PDT by chance33_98


"Mummified" Dinosaur Discovered In Montana

Hillary Mayell for National Geographic News October 10, 2002

Leonardo, a mummified, 77-million-year-old duck-billed dinosaur was only about three or four years old when he died, but he's proving to be a bonanza for paleontologists today.

His fossilized skeleton is covered in soft tissue—skin, scales, muscle, foot pads—and even his last meal is in his stomach.

An onsite restoration drawing of how "Leonardo" may have looked before burial based on observations and measurements of the specimen. The drawing was done by paleolife artist Greg Wenzel.

Art copyright Judith River Dinosaur Institute

"For paleontologists, if you can find one complete specimen in a lifetime, you've hit the jackpot," said Nate Murphy, curator of paleontology at the Phillips County Museum, Montana, where Leonardo makes his home. "To find one with so much external detail available, it's like going from a horse and buggy to a steam combustion engine. It will advance our science a quantum leap."

Leonardo is one of the most complete brachylophosaurus dinosaur fossils uncovered to date, and the first sub-adult. He is also only the fourth dinosaur fossil in the world to be classified as a "mummy" because of the soft tissue that is preserved.

The other three mummies were uncovered in the early 20th century, when excavation and preservation techniques were not as advanced as they are today.

"Paleontologists back then didn't have the techniques we have today to coax out the secrets these fossils are holding," said Murphy. "This specimen gives us a chance to apply modern scientific techniques to answer old questions."

The mummified fossil was named Leonardo because graffiti near its burial site in northern Montana read "Leonard Webb and Geneva Jordan, 1917." Leonardo made his debut to the scientific community today at the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, taking place October 9-12, in Norman, Oklahoma.

Remarkable State of Preservation

When he died, Leonardo was a 22-foot-long (seven meters) teenager, weighing between 1.5 to 2 tons. He sported polygonal, five-sided scales that ranged from the size of a BB (airgun pellet) to the size of a dime, and soft-tissue structures on his back suggest that he had a little sail frill running up it.

Scales and tissue parts have been found on less than one-tenth of one percent of all dinosaurs excavated. Leonardo's fossilized skeleton is about 90 percent covered in soft tissue, including skin, muscle, nail material, and a beak.

Skin impressions have been found on the underside of the skull and all along the neck, ribcage, legs, and left arm.

"When the animal was alive, the skin was almost as soft as your earlobe," said Murphy.

A three-dimensional rock-cast of the right shoulder muscle and throat tissue, and the pads on the bottom of the three-toed foot were also preserved.

Leonardo's stomach contents are so well-preserved that researchers can tell what he had for his last supper; a salad of ferns, conifers, and magnolias. The stomach also contained the pollen of more than 40 different plants.

All of these qualities should go a long way to providing concrete information about the diet, range of movement, methods of locomotion, and paleo-environment dinosaurs during the late Cretaceous (89 to 65 million years ago) experienced.

"We have the shoulder muscle to look at, so we can see how much range of motion he had," said Murphy. "We should be able to tell the size of his average step, how his chest muscles worked, and if he was truly a quadruped or if he was bipedal."

"Paleontology is not an exact science," he said. "All we have are bones, and from there we develop theories about what the animals looked like, how they moved, and what they ate. A specimen like Leonardo will take a lot of guess work out and really tell us if Steven Spielberg's getting it right."

Discovery and Excavation

Dan Stephenson, of Minot, North Dakota, discovered Leonardo during the last hour of the last day of a summer expedition in 2000 sponsored by the Judith River Dinosaur Institute.

"He had the wisdom to not mess with it," chuckles Murphy. "He went and got me and I knew right away we had a complete skeleton. Looking at the geology, I told the team that this was a great scenario for skin fossilization."

Excavation began in the summer of 2001, when a demolition expert, using low-impact charges, cleared away the huge boulders on the top of the hillside. A road to the site was cut, and a bulldozer was called in to scrape off the hilltop. Team members dug a six-foot -deep (two meters) trench around the fossil's perimeter, and then went in with hand tools—the scalpels, brushes, and dental picks that are a paleontologist's tools of trade.

Leonardo was disinterred from his cement-like grave as a single 6.5-ton block to preserve the skeleton. "He's in the record books as the largest dinosaur taken out in one chunk; it was a monumental undertaking," said Murphy.

The scientific work on Leonardo will keep paleontologists occupied for years.

"It's like looking through a frosted glass window. With bones you get an idea of what the animal looked like, but with soft tissue you get to see how the animal is put together—it goes a long way to clearing the frost," said Murphy.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bloodbath; crevolist; flamefestival; godsgravesglyphs; maryschweitzer; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-220 next last
To: thedilg
To have found actual dinosaur blood and DNA strands and then to tell us thar it is over 65 million years old is the height of absurdity.

It might be if they had actually found such things, but since they haven't, this is just another creationist tall tale.

21 posted on 10/11/2002 4:02:50 AM PDT by Dan Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
"Leonardo was disinterred from his cement-like grave as a single 6.5-ton block to preserve the skeleton."

Equally as fascinating should be the conditions that buried the critter in the first place. It would have to have been sudden, complete, and catastrophic.

Volcanic eruption? Earthquake? Meteor impact? Whatever it was, it couldn't have left the carcass out in the atmosphere for days, or it would not be in the shape it is in.

22 posted on 10/11/2002 4:06:40 AM PDT by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thedilg
Does anyone believe that the dinosaur could still have soft tissue and undigested food in its stomach after 77 million years?

No, which is why no such dinosaur has ever been found. Not even this one.

The article is somewhat misleading. An article on the website of The Society of Vertebrate Paleontology makes it clear that the "soft tissue" in the fossil is not actual "soft tissue", but is remarkably detailed FOSSILIZED CASTS of what used to be soft tissue:

Some of Leonardo's startling features include a three-dimensional rock cast of the right shoulder muscle and throat tissue, along with fossilized skin and stomach contents. The muscle casts will shed new light on dinosaur appearance and movement, and the stomach contents will add to information on Late Cretaceous environments.
The detail photos make clear it's rocky fossils of the original soft tissue, not actual preserved soft tissue:

Likewise for the stomach contents, which are fossilized and not "fresh":

Even with the most modern embalming methods and a completely dry atmosphere (i.e. Egypt) it would still only last thousands of years.

Scientists would have to do alot of explaining before I'll buy into that age.

Sorry, this fossil, as rare and special as it is, is hardly a violation of standard science. No "lot of explaining" necessary.

23 posted on 10/11/2002 4:16:40 AM PDT by Dan Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RWG
what is a steam combustion engine?

It's a $39.95 kit you can buy only on late night TV,
(Not available in stores.)

24 posted on 10/11/2002 4:16:50 AM PDT by ASA Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: thedilg
uh, it's a fossil
25 posted on 10/11/2002 4:21:16 AM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
I agree. I think it is the father of senator Robert Byrd. Scalely, reptilian and a pork-eater. A true coward that survives by hiding in the large ferns. Duck-bill fits him to a tee.

And it's pretty pretty pretty pretty pretty pretty pretty!

26 posted on 10/11/2002 4:33:35 AM PDT by Lil'freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet
You know of course that science is frowned upon by many here on FR?

Ooooo...what a slam!! After all, "science" is above politics and has no hidden agendas. I refer you to a book entitled "Bones of Contention."
27 posted on 10/11/2002 4:36:04 AM PDT by aardvark1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Junior
soft tissue does fossilize under the right conditions

Such as sudden burial in silt, during the course of a global flood!

28 posted on 10/11/2002 4:44:36 AM PDT by TomSmedley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: thedilg
You bring new meaning to that phrase "reading between the lines." The idea is to deduce from the information given, not to fabricate inaccurate information.
29 posted on 10/11/2002 5:21:58 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nightdriver
Equally as fascinating should be the conditions that buried the critter in the first place. It would have to have been sudden, complete, and catastrophic.

Don't let the libs get hold of this...they'll claim the wee dino was killed by an SUV.

30 posted on 10/11/2002 5:32:45 AM PDT by ncpastor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TomSmedley
The only problem with that "theory" (besides there being absolutely no evidence for a global flood) is the sorting of the fossils. You will not find five tonne dinosaurs in the same strata as five tonne elephants, nor do you find ichthyosaurs mixed in with dolphins. Then there is the problems associated with fossilized footprints and rain patterns deep within the geological column.
31 posted on 10/11/2002 5:45:42 AM PDT by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ncpastor
Come here, Leonardo! Wasn't he the little guy in the white lab coat? What was the name of that cartoon? Oh, man... this is gunna bug me all day!
32 posted on 10/11/2002 5:49:42 AM PDT by laker_dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Junior
His theory is no more asburd than the Darwinian "just so" faith-creed that posits that protons, neutrons, electrons and their consitituent parts randomly organized themselves into living matter just scant billions of years after the Big Bang.

In fact, his theory is actually far more reasonable and probable than the Darwinian faith-creed on the origins of life.

33 posted on 10/11/2002 5:55:02 AM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Comment #34 Removed by Moderator

To: chance33_98
That is too cool!
35 posted on 10/11/2002 6:01:36 AM PDT by Intimidator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
His theory is no more asburd than the Darwinian "just so" faith-creed that posits that protons, neutrons, electrons and their consitituent parts randomly organized themselves into living matter just scant billions of years after the Big Bang.

First off, Darwinism is a science. Secondly, it has nothing to do with the Big Bang, electrons, neutrons or protons. Thirdly, they began organizing themselves into matter within moments of the Big Bang. If your statements above are indicative of your scientific knowledge then you are definitely out of your element on these threads.

36 posted on 10/11/2002 6:01:37 AM PDT by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Lil'freeper
I bet the ball-sweat is a perfect match.
37 posted on 10/11/2002 6:02:25 AM PDT by johnny7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

bump
38 posted on 10/11/2002 6:03:32 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Intimidator
I bet it tastes like chicken.
39 posted on 10/11/2002 6:05:15 AM PDT by chance33_98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: csvset
I wonder if Clinton will try to hit on it.
40 posted on 10/11/2002 6:09:36 AM PDT by bribriagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-220 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson