Posted on 10/17/2002 1:37:48 PM PDT by Salman
The Bali bombing has almost been eclipsed in U.S. news by the D.C.-area sniper terrorist, who remains at large. But this new large-scale terrorist slaughter deserves our attention, not just because of the horrible loss of life, but because it suggests some very disturbing things about the future scope of global Islamic terrorism.
Indonesian officials have been jumping through rings to suggest that Al Qaeda had a role in the attack. From their point of view, that's very important: The Indonesian government is much better off depicting itself as prey to an international organization than admitting to a victory by home-grown terrorists. Meanwhile, a local group, Jemaah Islamiah, seems the most likely culprit but denies its involvement.
Does it really matter whether Al Qaeda was involved or not? Whether it was local or organized and funded from afar, the bombing screams the same fact about Islamic terrorism: This isn't merely about Israel or U.S. soldiers in Saudi Arabia. The Bali bombing bolsters what many have argued, and a few (myself among them) have been extremely hesitant to accept: The extremist jihad, fought by Al Qaeda and a growing roster of others, is a war against the West and all it stands for—most particularly: the secular state, pluralism, and the right to choose your pleasure.
Suppose the attack was local, the work of Jemaah Islamiah, which seeks to create a pan-Muslim state among Southeast Asian nations. A first step toward that goal is destabilizing Megawati Sukarnoputri's secular government. But equally important is ejecting the sinful infidel tourists, who drink, flash thigh, and tempt Indonesians by example. Taken a step further, the goal is a total exclusion of infidels from the Muslim world.
Or consider the idea that Al Qaeda was involved. If that's the case, any argument that the group's grievances were specific—i.e., intended to retaliate for U.S. foreign policy—is gone. Bombing a Bali nightclub doesn't target Americans; it targets Australians, who dominate tourism on the island. And again, it targets young people indulging in the worst of sins: drunken, sexy fun. That's the reality of Islamic extremism, and no change to U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East is likely to resolve it.
Sara Rimensnyder is Reason's assistant editor.
Here's a link to the previous day's editorial on the same subject:
Rocking the House of Peace (by Tim Cavanaugh)
To deal with terrorists we are going to have to develop teams that deal in hard core tactics, with plausible deniability. I would not have said this a few years ago, but it is clear there is no reasoning with these Islamist fanatics. They would as soon blow us all up in one big mushroom cloud if they had the chance--time to start severing the heads of this many-headed snake around the world. And causing a lot of weeping and grieving in their sanctuaries. This is the only thing they know.
Muslims.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.