Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WARNING: COMRADE SLIMEBALL TRAITOR SCOTT BIN RITTER SET TO APPEAR ON STUDIO B ANYTIME.
Fox News | 11/29/02 | Me

Posted on 11/29/2002 12:17:37 PM PST by Sparta

Shephard Smith just said that Scott Ritter is set to appear on Studio B. He just said send all e-mails to Ritter to Studiob@foxnews.com.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Announcements; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: jackass; slimeball; traitor
Let the games begin. Jane Skinner is not there so Shep should have his mind 100% on Comrade traitor Bin Ritter.
1 posted on 11/29/2002 12:17:37 PM PST by Sparta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sparta
Thanks for the info.
2 posted on 11/29/2002 12:18:04 PM PST by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bonfire
On next segment and send your questions to studiob@foxnews.com
3 posted on 11/29/2002 12:19:16 PM PST by Sparta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
What was the amount of money Ritter received from the Iraqi regime? I think it was $400,000 or so.

I would hazard a guess that Judas' 30 pieces of silver would be about the same amount, adjusted for inflation.

4 posted on 11/29/2002 12:25:24 PM PST by friendly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sparta

5 posted on 11/29/2002 12:27:52 PM PST by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Summary:

(1) Scott Ritter says it's all a conspiracy by the US and Britain.
(2) Scott Ritter went nuts the last minute of his interview challenging anyone who opposed him to a fight.
(3) Scott Ritter wants to fight Shep.
(4) Scott Ritter only cares about the United States Marines.LOL!!!!!!!!!
6 posted on 11/29/2002 12:30:31 PM PST by Sparta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
Scott is deeply concerned about where his checks will come from if Saddam is exiled or killed.
7 posted on 11/29/2002 12:32:35 PM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
What if Ritter is right and we are all wrong?
8 posted on 11/29/2002 12:32:44 PM PST by Chapita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chapita
Not a chance.
9 posted on 11/29/2002 12:33:42 PM PST by Sparta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
LOL! Shep quoted one email as saying "I can't add anything except why don't you just reach over and pop him in the jaw." I fell off the couch laughing. ROFLOL!!!!
10 posted on 11/29/2002 12:34:45 PM PST by Balata
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I don't care what anybody says.

I live in Delmar, NY if anybody wants to pop me in the mouth.

11 posted on 11/29/2002 12:35:15 PM PST by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
Looks like Ritter's been inspecting the inside of a few too many restaurants recently.

And everytime I see him he looks just a little closer to a complete breakdown....

Maybe a chorus of "If you knew Saddam, like I know Saddam!"

12 posted on 11/29/2002 12:35:30 PM PST by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff; All
I live in Delmar, NY if anybody wants to pop me in the mouth.

Anyone want to take him up on his offer. Better yet, I've my spot reserved on his firing squad.
13 posted on 11/29/2002 12:36:36 PM PST by Sparta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Chapita
Nothing wrong with questioning, but since to my knowledge, NONE of the former weapons inspectors who served with Ritter agree with his extreme positions, what is the likelyhood of him being the only one to be so 'enlightened'?
14 posted on 11/29/2002 12:37:15 PM PST by Route66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Chapita
What if Ritter is right and we are all wrong?

I have been giving Ritter the benefit of the doubt, but not publicly, lest I be called an unAmerican.

15 posted on 11/29/2002 12:38:32 PM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Chapita
He is wrong. The truth trumps his pandering to $addam.

IRAQI CHLD ABUSE ---TODAY

In Nahawan, Iraq, south of Baghdad, at the brick factory, these girls live inside the brick factory
where they are forced to work in intolerable conditions.


IRAQI CHLD ABUSE ---1988

Dead children, previously playing in Halabja [March 1988].


16 posted on 11/29/2002 12:38:57 PM PST by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Chapita
What if Ritter is right and we are all wrong?

What, that Saddam's a really great guy and doesn't mean ANYBODY any harm? And that if we'd leave him alone he'd have the Iraqi ecomony chugging along like Taiwan? And he really meant to have free elections and an elected leader but it slippped his mind? And all those Kurds didn't die from poison gas, they all had the flu?

Could be.

17 posted on 11/29/2002 12:39:35 PM PST by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Chapita
What if Ritter is right and we are all wrong?

Scott Ritter has been out of the intelligence loop since 1998. There is no way he knows for sure. He is simply buying Saddams line of no WMD.

18 posted on 11/29/2002 12:41:18 PM PST by Balata
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
I just brought up that notion because I remembered something I had said to a fellow who said the Gulf Of Tonkin affair was a fraud!
19 posted on 11/29/2002 12:43:26 PM PST by Chapita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Chapita
Personally I don't care if Ritter is right or wrong. There are more than enough reasons to eliminate Saddam from the world stage.
20 posted on 11/29/2002 12:51:39 PM PST by AmusedBystander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Chapita
I've sometimes wondered if Ritter is being blackmailed by Saddam in some way, or threatened. Ritter's wife is Chechan, I think, or from somewhere around that area. Perhaps she or her family are in some sort of danger unless Ritter keeps plugging away like this.

Other than that, he could just be a traitor, if none of the other inspectors agree with his comments, and he's doing this for money. I can't see any other reasons than these for what he's doing.
21 posted on 11/29/2002 1:00:08 PM PST by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Chapita
Sure, Saddam is an honorable man, eh?
22 posted on 11/29/2002 1:08:28 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Chapita
What if Ritter is right and we are all wrong?

That’s the $400,000 question. But thanks for playing, you have won some lovely parting gifts, as well as a free Jane Fonda exercise video.
23 posted on 11/29/2002 1:49:41 PM PST by Eric Esot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TomB
He really has porked up, hasn't he?

Although he didn't know it at the time, the a$$hole Biden was right anout Ritter; however, his treatment of Ritter at the hearings was unconscionable.

If I were Ritter, I would have let him have it with both barrels like Brendan Sullivan did at the Ollie North hearings.
24 posted on 11/29/2002 1:53:27 PM PST by VMI70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TomB
I don't know that much about Mr. Ritter. What is he saying now? that Saddam is complying with the UN inspections????
25 posted on 11/30/2002 1:48:27 PM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
No one has provided a convincing argument why Scott Ritter should be vilified for preaching a message of restraint. The man is a Marine. He is educated and uses his intelligence with such skill that compliments the Marine Corps reputation for recruiting and promoting such men. Just because Ritter speaks so eloquently against a bloodbath where, no doubt, many of his friends (maybe someone close to you) will get killed is no reason to profane his intentions with name-calling. I believe that people who have fought wars should have the last word on when we war on other people. When combat veterans speak on this issue, all others should pay them proper respect with thoughtful attention.
26 posted on 12/01/2002 6:11:29 PM PST by mandible
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
So much tragedy. This is what our military will do to these people, as we have done in Afghanistan. Children working in factories is not exclusive to Iraq. We are allied with governments, like Russia, who promote these same working conditions in their respective countries.

After a war with Iraq, these people will not be liberated. They will only serve another tyrant.
27 posted on 12/01/2002 6:17:25 PM PST by mandible
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mandible
Willy pitt, is that you??
28 posted on 12/01/2002 6:30:08 PM PST by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Comment #29 Removed by Moderator

To: Dutch-Comfort
Ollie North used the money from the weapons sales to fund freedom fighters in Nicaragua and to rescue hostages in Lebanon. Scott bin Ritter recieved money from the enemy to produce propaganda. I stand by my insults, comrade.
30 posted on 12/02/2002 5:14:51 AM PST by Sparta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
WSRitter@aol.com
31 posted on 12/02/2002 5:16:05 AM PST by Doctor Raoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
Ollie North used the money from the weapons sales to fund freedom fighters in Nicaragua and to rescue hostages in Lebanon.

And broke the law without seeing the release of a single hostage.

Scott bin Ritter recieved money from the enemy to produce propaganda. I stand by my insults, comrade.

Have you seen the film?

32 posted on 12/02/2002 8:26:24 AM PST by SteveTuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SteveTuck
"And broke the law without seeing the release of a single hostage."

The law was passed by a bunch liberal slimeballs who were sympathisers with the Commies who ran Nicaragua. We had a vested interest seeing that both sides would slaughter each other in the Iraq-Iran War. Ollie North tried to save American lives, Scott bin Ritter is a traitor who is assisting America's enemies.

33 posted on 12/02/2002 10:11:57 AM PST by Sparta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
The law was passed by a bunch liberal slimeballs who were sympathisers with the Commies who ran Nicaragua.

So the executive branch can pick and choose which laws it wants to obey...

By the way, have you seen the film?

34 posted on 12/02/2002 10:23:43 AM PST by SteveTuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SteveTuck
"So the executive branch can pick and choose which laws it wants to obey..."

"By the way, have you seen the film?"

Have you ever heard of covert ops? The actions were taken on behalf of America's national security and I believe President Reagan when he said he knew little if anything about Iran-Contra. BTW: No I haven't seen the film, but I know the film was financed by pro-Saddam businessmen and that told me all I wanted to know about the movie. So comrade, I again stand by my words calling Ritter a traitor.
35 posted on 12/02/2002 10:31:36 AM PST by Sparta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SteveTuck; Admin Moderator
SteveTuck signed up 2002-11-22.

So you must be from DU. Go on back there Comrade Tuck. Disruptors like you are not wanted here. In all of your previous posts, you have done nothing but attack conservatives. You have not once defended a conservative principle. So lay out your credentials as a conservative, comrade and I'll eat humble pie.
36 posted on 12/02/2002 10:35:02 AM PST by Sparta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
Have you ever heard of covert ops?

I will ask you again. Does the president get to pick the laws he wants to obey?

BTW: No I haven't seen the film,

Then how do you know that it is propaganda?

I again stand by my words calling Ritter a traitor.

What law has he broken?

37 posted on 12/02/2002 10:49:48 AM PST by SteveTuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
You have not once defended a conservative principle.

How about the principle that the executive branch must obey the constitutional authority of Congress...

38 posted on 12/02/2002 10:50:52 AM PST by SteveTuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SteveTuck
"I will ask you again. Does the president get to pick the laws he wants to obey?"

President Reagan had nothing to do with Iran-Contra. Put down your bong and come into the 21st century. We're discussing Iraq and the threat it poses.

"Then how do you know that it is propaganda?"

Put two and two together. Saddam's buddies don't film movies to give an objective view of a situation. Watch Iraqi TV and you'll see what I mean.

"What law has he broken?"

Read the article in the Constitution defining treason. bin Ritter has given aid and comfort to the enemies of the United States by giving anti-American speeches in the Iraqi Parliment. He also has gone national television falsely claiming that the UN inspectors were spies for the CIA and MOSSAD.




39 posted on 12/02/2002 11:05:52 AM PST by Sparta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SteveTuck
"How about the principle that the executive branch must obey the constitutional authority of Congress..."

Where were you during the Constitutional abuses of the Clinton regime?
40 posted on 12/02/2002 11:07:01 AM PST by Sparta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
President Reagan had nothing to do with Iran-Contra. Put down your bong and come into the 21st century. We're discussing Iraq and the threat it poses.

You defended Ollie North, who broke the law.

Put two and two together. Saddam's buddies don't film movies to give an objective view of a situation. Watch Iraqi TV and you'll see what I mean.

Let me know when you have seen the film.

Read the article in the Constitution defining treason. bin Ritter has given aid and comfort to the enemies of the United States by giving anti-American speeches in the Iraqi Parliment.

When did we declare war on Iraq? When did we lose the right to criticize our government?

He also has gone national television falsely claiming that the UN inspectors were spies for the CIA and MOSSAD.

UN inspectors were spying on Iraq for the CIA.

41 posted on 12/02/2002 11:17:17 AM PST by SteveTuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
Where were you during the Constitutional abuses of the Clinton regime?

Criticizing the Clinton government

42 posted on 12/02/2002 11:18:00 AM PST by SteveTuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson