Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Doctors set to transplant faces from dead to the living
Independent News via Drudge ^ | 11-28-2002 | By Jeremy Laurance, Health Editor

Posted on 11/30/2002 1:17:35 PM PST by vannrox

Doctors set to transplant faces from dead to the living

By Jeremy Laurance, Health Editor

28 November 2002

Surgeons are preparing to cross a new medical frontier with the transplant of a whole human face from a dead to a living person.

Advances in understanding of the processes of biological rejection and perfection of the skills necessary to carry out the surgery would make the operation technically possible within the next year, specialists said yesterday. The first candidates for the surgery could be children under six, disfigured by disease or accident, who are too young to have become familiar with their own appearance. Doctors said an adult acquiring a new face would have to cope with a major psychological and emotional challenge.

But the main barrier was likely to be public squeamishness about an operation that people associate with science fiction rather than surgical fact, specialists said. Peter Butler, a consultant plastic surgeon at the Royal Free Hospital, London and the Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, US, said a public debate was needed to determine society's views in advance of the surgery becoming possible.

Speaking before a conference organised by the British Association of Plastic Surgeons, at which latest research on face transplants was to be presented, Mr Butler said he expected to complete a study of the anatomical and technical difficulties involved in the next six months. Transplant of a whole face with underlying muscle would have advantages over current treatment methods that rely on skin grafts taken from other parts of the body. They do not allow movement – essential to convey feeling and expression – and create a mask-like appearance.

Mr Butler, who has researched new techniques of transplantation and tissue engineering for eight years and was part of the American research team that grew a "human ear" on the back of a mouse, said there were three options for the surgery. The first, the subcutaneous option, involved taking the skin, fatty tissue and blood supply. The second, the sub-periosteal option, would include facial muscle and nerves while the third option would take bone as well and involve partial reconstruction of the skull.

For the first transplant, if approved, surgeons would take the simplest and safest sub-cutaneous option, to minimise the risks. "On that basis we should be able to carry out a face transplant in the next six to nine months," he said.

A bigger challenge was to overcome rejection of the transplanted tissue. The skin is the most antigenic organ in the body triggering a powerful immune response which requires high doses of anti-rejection drugs be taken for life.

The anti-rejection drugs, such as cyclosporin, have nasty side-effects and increase the incidence of cancer but this is considered an acceptable risk for a life-saving transplant involving a kidney, heart or liver.

Where the transplant is about improving the quality of life, as with face transplants, the risks and benefits are more finely balanced.

Mr Butler said research to be presented to the conference opened up the prospect of drug-free immunosuppression, meaning transplants of faces and limbs could be done without the need for lifelong prescription of medicines.

The technique of immunosuppression, called a tolerance induction regime, had been successfully achieved in pigs by the Transplant Research Biology Centre in Massachusetts and trials on humans will start next year,

"If this comes to clinical reality in the next year or so it is going to open widely our ability to transplant the face," Mr Butler said. "I am told that the age at which children first recognise themselves is between five and six. Children might be the first group to use this technique on."

However, public squeamishness is a factor. A study of attitudes to "face donation" among 120 people, including doctors, nurses and lay people, found widespread resistance.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: aging; beauty; body; face; medical; medicine; men; pretty; transplant; treatment; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: crusher999
"Yeah....but is Michael the recipient...or the donor?"

Michael's not dead. Just his career.

21 posted on 11/30/2002 2:23:53 PM PST by badfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
This brings up the obvious question, "Why the wrong face?"
22 posted on 11/30/2002 2:28:16 PM PST by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox; ForGod'sSake
Somehow, the Rats will use this to get out of their dead people voting problem.
23 posted on 11/30/2002 3:06:54 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
Literally LOLing.LOL
24 posted on 11/30/2002 3:12:58 PM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
There are a lot of democrats that could benefit from this procedure. Any suggestions? I'll start: Diane Feinstein, Helen Thomas, Charlie Rangle...
25 posted on 11/30/2002 3:12:59 PM PST by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
"...mask-like appearance...

Nancy Pelossi.

26 posted on 11/30/2002 3:15:13 PM PST by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
Transplant an anus in place of Barney Frank's face.
27 posted on 11/30/2002 3:15:29 PM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
LOL!
28 posted on 11/30/2002 3:29:07 PM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!; Thinkin' Gal

29 posted on 11/30/2002 3:34:48 PM PST by 2sheep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 2sheep
Rich and white woman yes but he is not beautiful as a woman. He looks like a dead vampire.

LOL tho!!!

30 posted on 11/30/2002 3:48:21 PM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: 2sheep
He looks yellow in pic no. # 5. F R E A K.
31 posted on 11/30/2002 3:49:40 PM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: 2sheep
His mother must be horrified. I don't care if he is worth a trillion dollars.
32 posted on 11/30/2002 3:52:46 PM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
His mother must indeed be horrified. He was such a nice looking boy to begin with. In his mind though, he probably thinks of himself as beautiful. Imagine him going into a party and someone else saying, "Michael, what have you done to yourself?" What, indeed.
33 posted on 11/30/2002 4:00:40 PM PST by 2sheep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
I'm suspending disbelief in the belief that you could have possibly enjoyed the film FACE/OFF.
34 posted on 11/30/2002 4:37:04 PM PST by willyboyishere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2sheep
He had a skin condition that is why he bought mega skin bleach cream....yeah OK
35 posted on 11/30/2002 4:39:35 PM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: willyboyishere
In this movie the face was not dead tho was it?
36 posted on 11/30/2002 4:40:20 PM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
I read a book about travelling in Africa, where there was an area which apparently had mud which could bleach the skin. Read it many years, can't recall the book title. Probably used by this deranged nitwit Michael Jackson. Wonder if he had his face crushed surgically.
37 posted on 11/30/2002 5:56:07 PM PST by TransOxus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: jigsaw
Not only that, between the donor and the two recipients that's at least six democratic votes.
38 posted on 11/30/2002 6:04:34 PM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jigsaw
*LOL*...yeah I am!
39 posted on 11/30/2002 6:11:05 PM PST by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
I just now saw that what you said....since my comments weren't working all day; glad I made you laugh (but it's true you know) : )
40 posted on 11/30/2002 6:33:38 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson