Posted on 12/15/2002 6:32:09 AM PST by chiller
December 15, 2002
BY MARK STEYN SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST Advertisement
C'mon over, baby, a whole shakin' o' Lott goin' on. On the face of it, it seems incredible that a mere month after Bush's election triumph, the Beltway should be immersed in a discussion of where the 2002 Republican Party leadership stands on segregation. For this, we have Trent Lott to thank. The incoming Senate majority leader couldn't even wait till he'd come in to start screwing up. Insofar as he has any conservative defenders, the defense is this: Hey, relax, Trent isn't racist, just stupid.
You're telling me. If he were still majority leader in 2004, the NAACP would be running ads with video of Lott's remarks--we're proud of voting for Strom, and, if everybody else had followed our lead in 1948, ''we wouldn't have had all these problems''--followed by footage of black bodies hanging from trees, gallant Southern gentlemen standing around having a whale of a time, Billie Holiday's ''Strange Fruit'' on the soundtrack, etc: ''Trent Lott says, if we'd kept segregation and lynching, we wouldn't have all the uppity Negroes we have today.''
Now maybe that's not what he meant. He was speaking, after all, at some old coot's 100th birthday party. Most 100th birthday parties take place in nursing homes and, if you drop in, you generally find a lot of people standing around the old boy with inane grins, talking very loudly and very slowly and agreeing with everything he says. Maybe that's all Lott was doing, given the unique circumstances of a guy entering his second century as a sitting senator.
But there were cameras present; there was a microphone. Successful politicians are supposed to have a built-in blocking mechanism in such circumstances: The borderline racist gag about the Filipino poolboy rises in your gullet, is within sight of your tongue, but at the last nanosecond your political radar detector spots the C-SPAN crew and sends it back down deep into your bowels. Wild'n'crazy gonzo pols--like John McCain, who regaled a Washington fund-raiser with a Chelsea Clinton/Janet Reno gag dependent for its effect on implied lesbianism and transsexuality--lack these antennae, and that's why they're not ambassador to China.
If the Republicans are going to make a 51-49 Senate work for them, they'll need discipline. When the man who's supposed to enforce that discipline is so undisciplined himself, he needs to go.
Lott made a bad situation worse in his attempt at damage control. His immediate reaction was that he regretted giving the impression that he supported the ''discarded'' policies of the past--''discarded,'' as if racial segregation is like the gold standard or the 55 mph speed limit, one of those things that comes and goes in and out of fashion. He then said he'd meant that back in 1948 ol' Strom had a lot of other good policies: ''Defense was a big issue. We were coming out of the war'' This is the Mississippi version of ''Mussolini made the trains run on time.'' Even if he did, it doesn't make up for the central defining plank of the platform. And, in any case, don't tell me the Dixiecrats bailed because Harry Truman, the nuker of Japan, wasn't tough enough on defense.
Strom led the walkout from the '48 Democratic Convention because a presidential panel had proposed a federal anti-lynching law and the abolition of poll taxes designed to keep blacks from voting. That's it.
Even if he had the best policies ever on defense or NEA funding or federally mandated bicycling helmets, they're just a little sprig of garnish on the segregationist beef. And, as it happens, in those days Strom was a fairly conventional big-government Democrat. That, after all, is what a ''Dixiecrat'' is: a Southern racist Democrat. The GOP candidate that year was Thomas Dewey, a man who lives on only as a headline. If Trent Lott was eager to refight the 1948 election, that's the fellow he should have been talking up. If small government's the issue that wowed Mississippi, those guys should have voted for Dewey, and the headline would have come true. Instead, floundering through another stage of his apology tour the other night, the senator couldn't even remember the name of the Republican.
That's his gift to the Dems. For the best part of two centuries, the Democrats have been the party of race: In the 19th century, they were for slavery; in the 20th, for segregation; in the 21st, for the neo-segregation of ''affirmative action,'' ''hate crimes'' and all the other paraphernalia of the modish trickle-down apartheid determined to make racial categorization a permanent feature of the American landscape. In fairness to the Dems, this evolution represents a significant century-on-century improvement: There's no reason to believe that one day, come the 24th or 25th century, they won't have reached the position that American citizens should be treated as freeborn individuals, rather than as chorus members of their respective identity-group kicklines. That's what the Republican Party stands for: Condi Rice is an effective, black, female National Security Adviser but she holds that position not because of her blackness or her femaleness but her effectiveness; she's better than the white males who were up for the job.
It's pathetic that Jesse (''Hymietown'') Jackson should be huffing and puffing about Lott's outrageous behavior. It's ridiculous that RNC Chairman Marc Racicot has been bullied into a meeting with Al Sharpton: If Lott is unacceptable as Senate majority leader, the race-baiting Rev should be unacceptable anywhere. But that's why principled conservatives have a right to be furious with the senator.
When the NAACP do their ugly dragging ads about Republicans opposing ''hate crimes'' legislation, they're right to this extent: Most Republicans do oppose ''hate crimes'' legislation, and for very good reasons. And when Al Gore taunts George W. Bush about ''affirmative action,'' it's legitimate to this extent: Most Republicans regard racial quotas as an obnoxious and un-American concept. But, when Democrats start bashing the GOP as the party of segregation, that baggage is theirs.
For a century and a half, race is one issue the Republicans have been right on--or, at the very minimum, less wrong. We've grown used to the Democrats' strange black-is-white world, where Al Gore apparently genuinely believes his father was a civil rights crusader rather than a civil rights obstacle. Segregation is the Democrats' history, and for Trent Lott to give them an excuse to dump it on the GOP doorstep is all the reason Republicans needed to be done with him once and for all.
Though it's not like anybody on The Other Side would. Or has.
All that tells you is lott is a player and a strategist. Already the media is starting to play it as a Republican take down of Lott. With Goldberg, Noonan, and lots of others demanding he relinquish the leadership, his chances of being majority leader are nil.
With Nickles set to challenge and bush and Rove wanting Lott out he has zero chance to retain any power as a Republican.
I would remind you that Daschle defened Lott at first and never said anything very hard. I would note that very RINO senator Snowe issued a press release praising Lott. That wil allow Daschle to offer them both a good home in the Democartic party.
Lott knows he could never win reelection in a state with 40 percent black votes with this on his back. If he wants to stay in the senate, he will NEED to be a Democrat now, just like he NEEDED to be a Republican in 1972.
Just as in 1972 the solution is simple. Lott just has to change parties. If he can bring Snowe with him the will be the NEW HUGE DEMOCRATIC HERO who chopped down the evil bush and made Daschle Majority leader again.
The attempts by Bush and Rove to remove Lott is the single dumbest political act I have ever seen. It is like playing russian roulette with 5 chambers loaded.
Lott will either resign his seat making it a 50-50 senate or become what he once was... a loyal Democrat.
Perhaps Senator Byrd could tell Lott how Democrats handle Southern men who misspeak!!! I betcha Daschle and Pelosi already have.
However, after six and one-half years of watching his smarmy butt-kissing, I realize that is not possible. We has more second chances than Lazarus with the Kelly Flinn mess, impeachment, the 2000 five-seat loss disaster, the 50-50 cave-in, and his unwillingness to take control after the November election. In all cases, he has put his big mouth and his personal interests above the party, its ideals and its agenda.
Eventually, one has to stop the bleeding. It is clear that he cannot BS his way out of this mess. It is time for him to go before he becomes the face of the Republican party.
I also had forgotten that Thurmond left the Democrats ONLY when the Civil Rights Act was past.
puulllllleeeeeeeeeeeeesssssssssssss!!
Don't give the Lott man any ideas!
True, and Hannity can always be counted on to make the lamest arguments.
take some Vaccine Waters
We don't know that. As I read the Mississippi statutes, if Lott resigns from the Senate in calendar 2002, the Governor of Mississippi must schedule a special election within 90 days to name his replacement. He could appoint an interim Senator, but only for 90 days. Another window occurs in late 2003; if Lott resigns in, say, September or October of 2003, his replacement would be chosen in the general election in November.
I do not know what the risk is of a Democrat winning such an election, but for sure what will not happen is that the current Governor would appoint someone to serve out Lott's term.
I agree. That was the best paragraph. This whole thing is absolutely ridiculous. It makes me sick that no one, especially Republicans, can just say anything, anymore, without have to make sure they every "t" has been crossed, every "i" has a dot, without being crucified by the immoral, hypocritical, divisive, NAACP, Rats, ACLU, the Rat Black Caucus, which, IMO, try to read and scream "rascisim" into everything.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.