Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Big Drug War News (Congressman Dan Burton on the drug war)
The Agitator ^ | 17 December 2002 | Radley Balko

Posted on 12/17/2002 9:39:06 AM PST by Joe Bonforte

In a little noticed hearing of the House Government Reform Commnittee last week, Indiana Congressman (my homeotwn's Congressman actually) and longtime drug warrior Dan Burton made some stunning comments. In a hearing entitled "America's Heroin Crisis, Colombian Heroin and How We Can Improve Plan Colombia," Burton stopped just a hair short of advocating the decriminalization of drugs. Watch the video here (cut forward to 1 hour, 18 minutes into the hearing). Here's the transcript:

Dan Burton: I want to tell you something. I have been in probably a hundred or a hundred and fifty hearings like this at various times in my political career,. And the story is always the same. This goes back to the sixties. You know, thirty or thirty five years ago. And every time I have a hearing, I hear that people who get hooked on heroin and cocaine become addicted and they very rarely get off of it. And the scourge expands and expands and expands. And we have very fine law enforcement officers like you go out and fight the fight. And you see it growing and growing, and you see these horrible tragedies occur. But there is no end to it.

And I see young guys driving around in tough areas of Indianapolis in cars that I know they can’t afford and I know where they are getting their money. I mean that there is no question. A kid can’t be driving a brand-new Corvette when he lives in the inner city of Indianapolis in a ghetto. You know that he has gotta be making that money in someway that is probably not legal and probably involves drugs.

Over seventy percent of all crime is drug-related. And you alluded to that today. We saw on television recently Pablo Escobar gunned down and everybody applauded and said “that’s the end of the Medellín cartel. But it wasn’t the end. There is still a cartel down there. They are still all over the place. When you kill one, there’s ten or twenty or fifty waiting to take his place. You know why? Its because of what you just said a minute ago, Mr. Carr, Mr. Marcocci (sp). And that is that there is so much money to be made in it ­ there is always going to be another person in line to make that money.

And we go into drug eradication and we go into rehabilitation and we go into education, and we do all of these things... And the drug problem continues to increase. And it continues to cost us not billions, but trillions of dollars. Trillions! And we continue to build more and more prisons, and we put more and more people in jail, and we know that the crimes ­ most of the time ­ are related to drugs.

So I have one question I would like to ask all of you, and I think this is a question that needs to be asked. I hate drugs. I hate people who succumb to drug addiction, and I hate what it does to our society. It has hit every one of us in our families or friends of ours. But I have one question that nobody ever asks, and that is this question: What would happen if there was no profit in drugs? If there was no profit in drugs, what would happen. If they couldn’t make any money out of selling drugs, what would happen?

Carr: I would like to comment. If we made illegal... what you are arguing then is complete legalization?

Dan Burton: No I am not arguing anything. I am asking the question. Because we have been fighting this fight for thirty to forty years and the problem never goes way...

....Well I don’t think that the people in Colombia would be planting coca if they couldn’t make any money, and I don’t think they would be refining coca and heroin in Colombia if they couldn’t make any money. And I don’t think that Al Capone would have been the menace to society that he was if he couldn’t sell alcohol on the black market ­ and he did ­ and we had a horrible, horrible crime problem. Now the people who are producing drugs in Southeast Asia and Southwest Asia and Colombia and everyplace else. They don’t do it because they like to do it. They don’t fill those rooms full of money because they like to fill them full of money. They do it because they are making money.

At some point we to have to look at the overall picture and the overall picture ­ and I am not saying that there are not going to be people who are addicted ­ they are going to have to be education and rehabilitation and all of those things that you are talking about - but one of the parts of the equation that has never been talked about ­ because politicians are afraid to talk about it ­ this is my last committee hearing as Chairman. Last time! And I thought about this and thought about this, and thought about this. And one of the things that ought to be asked is “what part of the equation are we leaving out?” And “is it an important part of the equation?” And that is ­ the profit in drugs. Don’t just talk about education. Don’t just talk about eradication. Don’t just talk about killing people like Escobar, who is going to be replaced by somebody else. Let’s talk about what would happen if we started addressing how to get the profit out of drugs.

Wouldn't it be wonderful if, twenty years from now, we could look back at law-and-order Dan Burton's conversion as the "Nixon goes to China" turning point of the drug war?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: addictedlosers; antigovnerds; apotheadstory; blackhelicopters; brainlessdruggies; cheetos; chickenlittle; cocainekills; colombia; congress; conspiracists; crackbabys; curehemmorhoids; dopersarelosers; drugreformyes; drugskilledbolin; drugskilledelvis; drugskilledgram; drugskilledgrech; drugskilledhoon; drugskilledjanis; drugskilledjimi; drugskilledjohn; drugskilledmoon; drugskilledriver; drugskilledsid; drugskilledthain; drugsno; drugsruinlives; drugvicbelushi; drugvicdimwit; drugvicfarndon; drugvicgarcia; drugvicmelvoin; drugvicmydland; drugvicruffin; drugvicvalerie; gowodgetem; jbtsno; liberdopianlies; memoryloss; methdeath; nodoobieno; paranoia; ripwod; saynopetodope; skyisfalling; tinfoildruggies; warondrugs; wodlist; wodlives
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 501-509 next last
To: Texaggie79
I was going to correct you, but then I figured you really meant "heroine" and were implying that women were evil and addictive and caused all sorts of bad things to happen, and suddenly I didn't think you needed to be corrected anymore.
101 posted on 12/17/2002 11:57:40 AM PST by truenospinzone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
Oh, bull#$#$. Cut with the "gubment" crap. They didn't sit there rubbing their hands together wondering how they can CONTROL us more.

They were being hounded by their constituents to FIX the problem of drug addiction that was plaguing the nation.

102 posted on 12/17/2002 11:58:46 AM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
I know people that have used it. I don't need stats to tell me that crack offers a MUCH more intense high than regular cocaine.

Are you going to tell me that Double Expressos don't sell very well at StarBuck's?

103 posted on 12/17/2002 12:00:28 PM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
They were being hounded by their constituents to FIX the problem

Provide evidence for your claim.

104 posted on 12/17/2002 12:00:30 PM PST by MrLeRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Billy_bob_bob
I've proposed to Freepers that all drugs be licensed.

You would need a license to purchase and use any recreational drug (alcohol and tobacco included). Much the same as you need a license to operate a car.

To obtain a license, you would be required to have health insurance. This puts the health burden on the user, not the common citizen.

You would be required to read the latest literature regarding the known dangers of the drug and sign a release form. This puts the legal responsibility on the user.

All employers and health insurers of the user would be notified. Thus the financial burden is on the user. Employers would have to make their policy known for each type of drug before the user applies for a license though. The employer would have the right to continue the user's employment or not, based upon previously stated policy.

The license applicant would then pay some small administrative fee to process the application (like what is done for a drivers license). The benefit to the user is that he would be able to go to a licensed dealer, purchase the drugs for much less than the cost from an illegal dealer, with better quality, and without fear of prosecution.

The restrictions of the license may vary from drug to drug. Some of the harder drugs may restrict usage to personal residences only. Tobacco may have the fewest restrictions - just don't give it to minors.

Violation of the license would be a felony.

Why a license? Responsible users will have no problem with this. The burden of use will be all theirs. Problem users will be locked away for a long time. The illegal market then dries up.

105 posted on 12/17/2002 12:00:39 PM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: truenospinzone
LMAO!
106 posted on 12/17/2002 12:01:15 PM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
Read some friggin history. JEEZ. If I say that we stormed Normandy in WWII are you going to ask me to provide evidence for my claim?
107 posted on 12/17/2002 12:02:28 PM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
I don't need stats to tell me that crack offers a MUCH more intense high than regular cocaine.

I was challenging your other four claims:


108 posted on 12/17/2002 12:02:44 PM PST by MrLeRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
Read some friggin history.

Sorry, I'm not doing your homework for you. When YOU make a claim, the burden is on YOU to provide evidence.

109 posted on 12/17/2002 12:03:32 PM PST by MrLeRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
If I say that we stormed Normandy in WWII are you going to ask me to provide evidence for my claim?

If I did ask you, you could easily provide it and I'd be left looking foolish.

110 posted on 12/17/2002 12:05:32 PM PST by MrLeRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
Cut with the "gubment" crap. They didn't sit there rubbing their hands together wondering how they can CONTROL us more.

Typical liberal, singing the government-is-our-friend tune.

111 posted on 12/17/2002 12:06:28 PM PST by MrLeRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
Um..... let's see. If your theory is true, that crack users would rather use powdered coke, then there would be no such thing as a rich person using crack, right?

Daryl Strawberry is a figment of our imagination. Hollywood doesn't REALLY exist. Robert Downey Jr is all fiction........

112 posted on 12/17/2002 12:07:16 PM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
So, while you may have remedied the supply side, killing off the cartels and giving the job of production over to corporations, you INCREASE the motivation of users and non users to use MORE. I don't see that as a good thing.

I think it would be: Uncle Chuck Darwin's way of cleaning out that ring around the gene pool.

113 posted on 12/17/2002 12:08:19 PM PST by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
Typical Libertarian singing the government-is-full-of-evil-boogie-men-who-just-want-to-control-us tune.

I am quite aware of how your thinking can get so skewed when you only hang around with militia rednex....

114 posted on 12/17/2002 12:09:47 PM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
crack users would rather use powdered coke

I never said that. Beat your straw men somewhere else.

115 posted on 12/17/2002 12:11:57 PM PST by MrLeRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
All this is moot. Find you a state with enough milita freak Libertarians that would be ignorant enough to vote to legalize all drugs, and you can live your dream.

I am quite happy living where I do. Sure, I will vote to legalize pot, every time the issue comes up, but if the majority of my fellow statesmen see too much risk in it, then we shall remain a state with laws against pot.

116 posted on 12/17/2002 12:12:17 PM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
Typical Libertarian singing the government-is-full-of-evil-boogie-men-who-just-want-to-control-us tune.

Conservatives don't mistrust government?

I am quite aware of how your thinking can get so skewed when you only hang around with militia rednex....

I know no militia members---but your need to descend to personal insults is duly noted.

117 posted on 12/17/2002 12:13:28 PM PST by MrLeRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Hi CJ. I'll pose to you the same question I posed to Dane - Are you willing to accuse Dan Burton of being a "George Soros loving liberdopian" on this public forum? If not, why do you insist on calling other non-drug users who express similar opinions to Burton's names like that?
118 posted on 12/17/2002 12:20:05 PM PST by jmc813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
When it get's down to the state level, communities can set limits on the risks they are willing to take.

All things are Ok if they are done on the state level. It's OK to use heroin or not, depending on what the state says. Or murder for that matter. Fill in the blank.

119 posted on 12/17/2002 12:22:13 PM PST by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
If not, why do you insist on calling other non-drug users who express similar opinions to Burton's names like that?

Because he's nuts.

120 posted on 12/17/2002 12:24:13 PM PST by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 501-509 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson