Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barrick Gold Corp. and J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. Accused of Illegal Gold Market Manipulation
Press Release ^ | 18 December 2002 | Unknown

Posted on 12/18/2002 9:53:28 AM PST by LSUfan

An anti-trust lawsuit filed today accuses Barrick Gold Corp., Toronto, and J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., New York City, of "unlawfully combining to actively manipulate the price of gold" and making (US) $2 billion in short-selling profits by suppressing the price of gold at the expense of individual investors.

(Excerpt) Read more at savegold.com ...


TOPICS: Announcements; Breaking News; Business/Economy; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: barrick; gold; goldbugsalert; goldfoilhatalert; jpmorganchase
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last

1 posted on 12/18/2002 9:53:28 AM PST by LSUfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LSUfan
Oh, God forbid anyone make a profit!
2 posted on 12/18/2002 9:56:27 AM PST by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan
I figured this was coming! It all has to do with derivatives. Doesn't surprise me a bit!
3 posted on 12/18/2002 9:57:42 AM PST by Matchett-PI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan
These are undoubtedly the parties most likely to be involved in gold manipulation. Barrick is famed for selling gold ahead massively, and Morgan is famed for its immense holdings of gold derivatives.

Whether the suit can succeed is another matter. I suspect that the Fed is involved as well, and that they may intervene in the same way that they did against the Hunt Brothers' silver holdings. As the old saying goes, you can't fight City Hall.
4 posted on 12/18/2002 9:59:21 AM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan
This is great news! Anyone holding physical ought to be pretty happy. Shine the light on those cockroaches.
5 posted on 12/18/2002 10:00:47 AM PST by Sangamon Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arete; razorback-bert; rohry
Thought this might be of interest.
6 posted on 12/18/2002 10:03:12 AM PST by dtel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan
From the article: "If gold had kept pace with inflation, the price today would be approximately $760 (per ounce)."

No need to read any further...this guy is a looney. If my stock portfolio had kept pace with inflation, I'd be retired!!
Welcome to the investment world and good luck on your court case. LOL!!
7 posted on 12/18/2002 10:20:04 AM PST by Cuttnhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
The problem is that the bullion banks sell gold that doesn't exist. If everyone who had an option to buy the gold tried to cash in, the world financial markets would implode. Nothing wrong making a fair profit, but conspiring to keep the gold price low by selling gold that doesn't exist is unfair to those who are trying to sell gold they actually own.
8 posted on 12/18/2002 10:58:37 AM PST by BearCub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cuttnhorse
This case was already known to many goldbugs. I read about it several weeks ago. I doubt they will be successful, but the case will draw attention to the large short positions, which is bullish for gold. In the last few days, I have heard segments on Bloomberg, CNBC, and local AM radio that were moderately bullish on gold. The general public is starting to become aware of what goldbugs have known for the last 2 years.
9 posted on 12/18/2002 11:02:06 AM PST by Soren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dtel
Thanks
10 posted on 12/18/2002 11:27:38 AM PST by razorback-bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
"Oh, God forbid anyone make a profit!"

Hey..I'm with you. Screw anybody....as long as their is a profit to be made.

11 posted on 12/18/2002 11:37:43 AM PST by hove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
There is a better source on CBS MarketWatch. Here are some key paragraphs:

"The suit was filed by Blanchard and Company, Inc., New Orleans, the largest retail dealer in physical gold in the United States, and by Blanchard clients who bought gold bullion. Blanchard (www.blanchardonline.com) is paying the costs of the suit, which asks the Federal Court to terminate the trading agreements between Barrick and J.P. Morgan Chase and other, as yet unnamed, bullion banks. It also seeks the payment of treble damages to Blanchard's clients for the losses they have suffered as a result of Barrick's and J.P. Morgan Chase's unlawful price manipulation, anti-trust violations and unfair trade practices.

"Since the end of 1987, when the collaboration between Barrick and J.P. Morgan began, the growth of global income and wealth would have lifted the gold price to approximately $740 if the price had been able to respond to the normal laws of supply and demand," stated Blanchard's Chief Executive Officer, Donald W. Doyle, Jr. "If gold had kept pace with inflation, the price today would be approximately $760."

"The lawsuit claims that in the past five years Barrick and J.P. Morgan Chase injected millions of additional ounces of gold into the market - additions that were several times as great as the annual production of every gold mine in South Africa, the largest gold producing nation in the world. By using privately negotiated derivative contracts and concealing the addition of billions of dollars worth of (physical) gold with off-balance sheet accounting, Barrick was able to make it virtually impossible for gold analysts and investors to determine the size and the market impact of its trading positions.

"The same type of accounting maze that hid Enron's debts made it possible for Barrick to manipulate the price of gold without the checks and balances that come from public scrutiny. As a percentage of Barrick's total assets, its off-balance sheet assets make Enron look like a champion of full disclosure," said Doyle. "Is Barrick a gold mining company, or is it a hedge fund with a mine out back?"

"The suit alleges that J.P. Morgan Chase financed Barrick's repeated short selling with remarkably advantageous terms not available to others, including deferred repayments and no margin calls. Doyle said the short-sales scheme between the bank and Barrick appears to be the proverbial "money for nothing."

"Over the past five years, J.P. Morgan Chase loaned gold to Barrick at approximately 1.5 percent; sold the gold into the market and invested the dollar proceeds at approximately 6.5 percent; then paid both the proceeds from the sales and the 5 percent interest differential to Barrick whenever it repaid any of the borrowed gold. During a period when the price of gold dropped by more than 25%, Barrick's annual operating cash flow increased by more than 400%."

If the above proves to have merit, count on class action suits with there not being enough money in defendants control to pay all the claims. This may be also curtains for Alan Greenspan and several or more Treasury Secretaries, but not the present one.

12 posted on 12/18/2002 12:01:54 PM PST by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Soren
Did you read this? Pure Garbage. Good luck.!! :)
13 posted on 12/18/2002 12:03:04 PM PST by Afronaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dtel; mountaineer
Thanks for the bump. GATA tried to sue these guys (along with The Fed, and a few other government and quasi-governmental agencies) but the case was thrown out because they didn't have "standing." These guys (a huge gold dealer) obviously has "standing."

I believe a Freeper with the screen name mountaineer was working a similiar case...
14 posted on 12/18/2002 12:06:58 PM PST by rohry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
This may be also curtains for Alan Greenspan and several or more Treasury Secretaries, but not the present one.

Do you mean Rubin? If so, how so?
15 posted on 12/18/2002 12:16:05 PM PST by MamaLucci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rohry
Thanks for the bump. I wrote a news story about the Reg Howe lawsuit several months ago, and have been planning to do a follow up. It looks like this is the time!
16 posted on 12/18/2002 12:20:29 PM PST by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer
"I wrote a news story about the Reg Howe lawsuit several months ago, and have been planning to do a follow up. It looks like this is the time!"

Better hurry! The word on the street is that the gold derivatives market blow up when gold gets to $348:


17 posted on 12/18/2002 12:53:49 PM PST by rohry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
You should read the self-serving press release (filed by the company that is suing the banks) before you respond.
18 posted on 12/18/2002 1:20:10 PM PST by berserker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dtel
Yes, I'm glad to see that this situation is finally getting some attention.

Richard W.

19 posted on 12/18/2002 2:15:37 PM PST by arete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: arete
Gold is up 3.70 in overseas trading tonight.
20 posted on 12/18/2002 3:20:46 PM PST by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson