Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York passes tough anti-smoking law
Yahoo.com ^ | 18 December 2002 | Martha Graybow

Posted on 12/18/2002 4:31:05 PM PST by SheLion

NEW YORK, Dec 18 - New Yorkers, say goodbye to the smoke-filled saloon.

The City Council on Wednesday overwhelmingly passed one of the country's toughest anti-smoking bills, outlawing smoking in virtually all workplaces, including bars, nightclubs and restaurants. The most populous U.S. city would join California and Delaware in adopting sweeping curbs on smoking in public.

"This is an important protection for employees and a quality of life improvement for all New Yorkers," City Council Speaker Gifford Miller said.

The bill will become law 90 days after it is signed by Mayor Michael Bloomberg, an ex-smoker who over the summer proposed tightening the city's smoking ban.

The measure will expand a 1995 city law that banned lighting up in restaurants with more than 35 seats. It offers only a few concessions to businesses, despite complaints that the new restrictions will drive away customers.

"It's a disgrace that they voted against our businesses and against our families," said Ciaran Staunton, owner of O'Neill's, a midtown Manhattan restaurant and bar.

Passage was widely expected after Bloomberg and the council leadership reached a compromise last week.

Exceptions include allowing smoking in portions of outdoor cafes, rooftop restaurants and some private clubs without employees. A handful of existing cigar bars will be allowed to continue to permit smoking. Existing bars may also build ventilated "smoking" rooms.

"It would have been better to pass a total ban than what they wound up with," said Chuck Hunt, executive vice president of the New York State Restaurant Association, which represents about 2,500 city restaurants. "Any exception creates an unlevel playing field."

The council said the bill was aimed at protecting employees in every workplace from being exposed to cigarette smoke on the job.

A spokesman for Philip Morris USA, the domestic tobacco division of Philip Morris Cos. Inc.   said the company opposed the measure and would have to study how it would affect smoking policies at its Manhattan offices. The company's offices have designated smoking and non-smoking areas.

"We'll take a look at our own office situation and determine what changes need to be made to bring our particular building into compliance," spokesman Brendan McCormick said.

In another move to improve "quality of life," the council passed a bill to curb cellular phone use during movies, plays and other public performances, excluding sporting events.

The legislation is believed to be the first in the country to ban talking on mobile phones or using the audible ringer on the devices while a performance is under way. The mayor's office has said the bill appears unenforceable, and that there is a chance Bloomberg will veto it.

 


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Culture/Society; Government; US: New York
KEYWORDS: antismokers; bans; butts; cancer; cigarettes; individualliberty; michaeldobbs; niconazis; prohibitionists; pufflist; secondhandsmoke; smokingbans; sorelosers; taxes; tobacco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-138 next last
To: qam1
Thanks for the links. I hope it does some good. They never seem to listen to us anyway.
41 posted on 12/18/2002 6:01:51 PM PST by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Max McGarrity
There are no Republicans in NYC. A few RINOs, but no Repubbies.

This sure is disgusting. Didn't any of the bar/restaurant owners show up for this meeting? I sure wonder.......

42 posted on 12/18/2002 6:03:05 PM PST by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
How sad. Seven million people stand idly by and watch the city council wipe their butts on the constitution. Nope. It ain't going to be easy or quick to restore the country with more than 90 percent not knowing what to restore it to.
43 posted on 12/18/2002 6:06:49 PM PST by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EricOKC
You don't hear much about it, Eric, but apparently lots of Kookiefornians are doing just that. Low profile, I imagine, since the rabid antis trot around with their cell phones, ready to call in the troops on any scofflaws they find. Seems they've discovered about 60% of bars are "noncompliant," iow, giving the totalitarians the one-finger salute And if that happens here in the land of fruits and nuts, you can bet it will be worse in New Yawk.
44 posted on 12/18/2002 6:09:18 PM PST by Max McGarrity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: *all
Fly Life
Hip-Hop Hooray
Source: Village Voice, 2002-10-30
Author: Tricia Romano

Intro: What might really crush nightlife is Mayor Bloomberg's anti-smoking bill—which would ban cigs in any club or bar. As Robert Bookman, the lawyer for the New York Nightlife Association points out, if you think neighbors are in a tiff over noisy bars and drunken revelers now, what's going to happen when a few thousand soused nightcrawlers converge on the city's sidewalks to puff away?

"It runs counterintuitive to the Silent Night proposal," says Bookman, referring to the mayor's new plan to quiet New York's main drags. "If you want to keep streets quiet, the last thing you want to do is turn them into smoking halls." . .

Bookman pooh-poohs those who say that the smoking ban in California didn't negatively affect the industry: "California is not New York City. We don't have big bars with parking lots and nice weather. We have small places with residents right next door."

45 posted on 12/18/2002 6:10:42 PM PST by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Eastbound
How sad. Seven million people stand idly by and watch the city council wipe their butts on the constitution. Nope. It ain't going to be easy or quick to restore the country with more than 90 percent not knowing what to restore it to.

They know how to restore it the problem is 90% (and that's a low estimate) of people don't want to take a little time out of their self absorbed life to do anything about it.

If just 10% of the bar/resturant owners/employees showed up they would have driven the antismoking nazis into the Hudson

It is Apathy that is and will destroy this country

46 posted on 12/18/2002 6:11:48 PM PST by qam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Eastbound
How sad. Seven million people stand idly by and watch the city council wipe their butts on the constitution. Nope. It ain't going to be easy or quick to restore the country with more than 90 percent not knowing what to restore it to.

I just can't understand the bar/restaurant owners letting them get away with this. I just shake my head......

47 posted on 12/18/2002 6:13:23 PM PST by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Bookman pooh-poohs those who say that the smoking ban in California didn't negatively affect the industry: "California is not New York City. We don't have big bars with parking lots and nice weather. We have small places with residents right next door."

There is another factor in California bars close up at 1:30am with everybody out by 2:00am and in some places it is 12:30/1:00am.

New York is the City that Never sleeps. Bars are typically open past 4:00am

There is a big difference in groups of people hanging out at midnight & 3:00 am

48 posted on 12/18/2002 6:16:20 PM PST by qam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: qam1
It is Apathy that is and will destroy this country

People have a tendency to just turn their heads until it hits THEM in the pocket book. You watch, 4-6 months down the line after the ban goes into effect, we will be reading about the woes of the industry. Lack of revenue. You watch.

We see it all the time. All over the U.S.

49 posted on 12/18/2002 6:16:33 PM PST by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
True, It's only now the bartenders & resturant people are just starting to protest in Delaware.

Where were they before?

50 posted on 12/18/2002 6:19:22 PM PST by qam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: qam1
Where were they before?

They were probably thinking "This can't happen to us."

Then, when they find out it HAS happened to them, it's probably too late.

51 posted on 12/18/2002 6:20:51 PM PST by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Well the other problem is Bloomberg thinks he is on a mission from god with this smoking ban so he is going to stick to it no matter what the consequences. Unless it is overturned in the courts NYC will be stuck with this law until 2006.


52 posted on 12/18/2002 6:22:44 PM PST by qam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Didn't any of the bar/restaurant owners show up for this meeting?

It didn't matter, SheLion. This was just a formality to rubber-stamp the pre-determined travesty. Miller never intended to give our side an actual hearing, this whole theater of the absurd was no more than Gifford Miller showing Bloominidiot how much power he wields in the council. We've pretty much established now that they're either kings or gods...depending on which of them you ask.

53 posted on 12/18/2002 6:23:13 PM PST by Max McGarrity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Max McGarrity
We've pretty much established now that they're either kings or gods...depending on which of them you ask.

You got to admit, it wasn't for lack of us trying. I sent countless letters, as well as you and several others. I have Gerald Miller's emails still in my box. He's a two-faced idiot, as well.

They made up their minds long ago.

54 posted on 12/18/2002 6:30:19 PM PST by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Max McGarrity
GIFFORD Miller, I meant.
55 posted on 12/18/2002 6:31:59 PM PST by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
They made up their minds long ago.

Oh the fix was in a long time ago. Miller onnly pretended to have reservations because he wanted Bloomberg to go along with a wage increase for union members of city contractors.

Bloomberg is a lowlife, He fought with vigor raises for Police, Firemen and Transit workers claiming budget woes but quickly went along with raises for union members.

56 posted on 12/18/2002 6:37:29 PM PST by qam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Max McGarrity
" . . . . they're either kings or gods. . . ."

Then maybe it's time for them to have the 'royal sceptor' stuck up their . . shoved up their . . presented to them in some meaningful way.

57 posted on 12/18/2002 6:45:09 PM PST by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: qam1
Bloomberg is a lowlife, He fought with vigor raises for Police, Firemen and Transit workers claiming budget woes but quickly went along with raises for union members.

I read where he even wanted to close fire stations and police stations. This man needs to be removed from office.

58 posted on 12/18/2002 7:02:59 PM PST by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Mark
Thank God for Hoboken!
59 posted on 12/18/2002 7:11:08 PM PST by motzman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: motzman
Thank God for Hoboken!

Thank God for New Jersey! New Jersey here they come!!

60 posted on 12/18/2002 7:12:37 PM PST by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-138 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson