Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coffee,Tea,or Should We Feel Your Pregnant Wifes Breasts Before Throwing You in a Cell attheAirport?
lewrockwell.com ^ | 12/18/2002 | Nicholas Monahan

Posted on 12/21/2002 11:33:05 AM PST by Libertarian Billy Graham

 

Coffee, Tea, or Should We Feel Your Pregnant Wife’s Breasts Before Throwing You in a Cell at the Airport and Then Lying About Why We Put You There?

by Nicholas Monahan

This morning I’ll be escorting my wife to the hospital, where the doctors will perform a caesarean section to remove our first child. She didn’t want to do it this way – neither of us did – but sometimes the Fates decide otherwise. The Fates or, in our case, government employees.

On the morning of October 26th Mary and I entered Portland International Airport, en route to the Las Vegas wedding of one of my best friends. Although we live in Los Angeles, we’d been in Oregon working on a film, and up to that point had had nothing but praise to shower on the city of Portland, a refreshing change of pace from our own suffocating metropolis.

At the security checkpoint I was led aside for the "inspection" that’s all the rage at airports these days. My shoes were removed. I was told to take off my sweater, then to fold over the waistband of my pants. My baseball hat, hastily jammed on my head at 5 AM, was removed and assiduously examined ("Anything could be in here, sir," I was told, after I asked what I could hide in a baseball hat. Yeah. Anything.) Soon I was standing on one foot, my arms stretched out, the other leg sticking out in front of me àla a DUI test. I began to get pissed off, as most normal people would. My anger increased when I realized that the newly knighted federal employees weren’t just examining me, but my 7½ months pregnant wife as well. I’d originally thought that I’d simply been randomly selected for the more excessive than normal search. You know, Number 50 or whatever. Apparently not though – it was both of us. These are your new threats, America: pregnant accountants and their sleepy husbands flying to weddings.

After some more grumbling on my part they eventually finished with me and I went to retrieve our luggage from the x-ray machine. Upon returning I found my wife sitting in a chair, crying. Mary rarely cries, and certainly not in public. When I asked her what was the matter, she tried to quell her tears and sobbed, "I’m sorry...it’s...they touched my breasts...and..." That’s all I heard. I marched up to the woman who’d been examining her and shouted, "What did you do to her?" Later I found out that in addition to touching her swollen breasts – to protect the American citizenry – the employee had asked that she lift up her shirt. Not behind a screen, not off to the side – no, right there, directly in front of the hundred or so passengers standing in line. And for you women who’ve been pregnant and worn maternity pants, you know how ridiculous those things look. "I felt like a clown," my wife told me later. "On display for all these people, with the cotton panel on my pants and my stomach sticking out. When I sat down I just lost my composure and began to cry. That’s when you walked up."

Of course when I say she "told me later," it’s because she wasn’t able to tell me at the time, because as soon as I demanded to know what the federal employee had done to make her cry, I was swarmed by Portland police officers. Instantly. Three of them, cinching my arms, locking me in handcuffs, and telling me I was under arrest. Now my wife really began to cry. As they led me away and she ran alongside, I implored her to calm down, to think of the baby, promising her that everything would turn out all right. She faded into the distance and I was shoved into an elevator, a cop holding each arm. After making me face the corner, the head honcho told that I was under arrest and that I wouldn’t be flying that day – that I was in fact a "menace."

It took me a while to regain my composure. I felt like I was one of those guys in The Gulag Archipelago who, because the proceedings all seem so unreal, doesn’t fully realize that he is in fact being arrested in a public place in front of crowds of people for...for what? I didn’t know what the crime was. Didn’t matter. Once upstairs, the officers made me remove my shoes and my hat and tossed me into a cell. Yes, your airports have prison cells, just like your amusement parks, train stations, universities, and national forests. Let freedom reign.

After a short time I received a visit from the arresting officer. "Mr. Monahan," he started, "Are you on drugs?"

Was this even real? "No, I’m not on drugs."

"Should you be?"

"What do you mean?"

"Should you be on any type of medication?"

"No."

"Then why’d you react that way back there?"

You see the thinking? You see what passes for reasoning among your domestic shock troops these days? Only "whackos" get angry over seeing the woman they’ve been with for ten years in tears because someone has touched her breasts. That kind of reaction – love, protection – it’s mind-boggling! "Mr. Monahan, are you on drugs?" His snide words rang inside my head. This is my wife, finally pregnant with our first child after months of failed attempts, after the depressing shock of the miscarriage last year, my wife who’d been walking on a cloud over having the opportunity to be a mother...and my anger is simply unfathomable to the guy standing in front of me, the guy who earns a living thanks to my taxes, the guy whose family I feed through my labor. What I did wasn’t normal. No, I reacted like a drug addict would’ve. I was so disgusted I felt like vomiting. But that was just the beginning.

An hour later, after I’d been gallantly assured by the officer that I wouldn’t be attending my friend’s wedding that day, I heard Mary’s voice outside my cell. The officer was speaking loudly, letting her know that he was planning on doing me a favor... which everyone knows is never a real favor. He wasn’t going to come over and help me work on my car or move some furniture. No, his "favor" was this: He’d decided not to charge me with a felony.

Think about that for a second. Rapes, car-jackings, murders, arsons – those are felonies. So is yelling in an airport now, apparently. I hadn’t realized, though I should have. Luckily, I was getting a favor, though. I was merely going to be slapped with a misdemeanor.

"Here’s your court date," he said as I was released from my cell. In addition, I was banned from Portland International for 90 days, and just in case I was thinking of coming over and hanging out around its perimeter, the officer gave me a map with the boundaries highlighted, sternly warning me against trespassing. Then he and a second officer escorted us off the grounds. Mary and I hurriedly drove two and a half hours in the rain to Seattle, where we eventually caught a flight to Vegas. But the officer was true to his word – we missed my friend’s wedding. The fact that he’d been in my own wedding party, the fact that a once in a lifetime event was stolen from us – well, who cares, right?

Upon our return to Portland (I’d had to fly into Seattle and drive back down), we immediately began contacting attorneys. We aren’t litigious people – we wanted no money. I’m not even sure what we fully wanted. An apology? A reprimand? I don’t know. It doesn’t matter though, because we couldn’t afford a lawyer, it turned out. $4,000 was the average figure bandied about as a retaining fee. Sorry, but I’ve got a new baby on the way. So we called the ACLU, figuring they existed for just such incidents as these. And they do apparently...but only if we were minorities. That’s what they told us.

In the meantime, I’d appealed my suspension from PDX. A week or so later I got a response from the Director of Aviation. After telling me how, in the aftermath of 9/11, most passengers not only accept additional airport screening but welcome it, he cut to the chase:

"After a review of the police report and my discussions with police staff, as well as a review of the TSA’s report on this incident, I concur with the officer’s decision to take you into custody and to issue a citation to you for disorderly conduct. That being said, because I also understand that you were upset and acted on your emotions, I am willing to lift the Airport Exclusion Order...."

Attached to this letter was the report the officer had filled out. I’d like to say I couldn’t believe it, but in a way, I could. It’s seemingly becoming the norm in America – lies and deliberate distortions on the part of those in power, no matter how much or how little power they actually wield.

The gist of his report was this: From the get go I wasn’t following the screener’s directions. I was "squinting my eyes" and talking to my wife in a "low, forced voice" while "excitedly swinging my arms." Twice I began to walk away from the screener, inhaling and exhaling forcefully. When I’d completed the physical exam, I walked to the luggage screening area, where a second screener took a pair of scissors from my suitcase. At this point I yelled, "What the %*&$% is going on? This is &*#&$%!" The officer, who’d already been called over by one of the screeners, became afraid for the TSA staff and the many travelers. He required the assistance of a second officer as he "struggled" to get me into handcuffs, then for "cover" called over a third as well. It was only at this point that my wife began to cry hysterically.

There was nothing poetic in my reaction to the arrest report. I didn’t crumple it in my fist and swear that justice would be served, promising to sacrifice my resources and time to see that it would. I simply stared. Clearly the officer didn’t have the guts to write down what had really happened. It might not look too good to see that stuff about the pregnant woman in tears because she’d been humiliated. Instead this was the official scenario being presented for the permanent record. It doesn’t even matter that it’s the most implausible sounding situation you can think of. "Hey, what the...godammit, they’re taking our scissors, honey!" Why didn’t he write in anything about a monkey wearing a fez?

True, the TSA staff had expropriated a pair of scissors from our toiletries kit – the story wasn’t entirely made up. Except that I’d been locked in airport jail at the time. I didn’t know anything about any scissors until Mary told me on our drive up to Seattle. They’d questioned her about them while I was in the bowels of the airport sitting in my cell.

So I wrote back, indignation and disgust flooding my brain.

"[W]hile I’m not sure, I’d guess that the entire incident is captured on video. Memory is imperfect on everyone’s part, but the footage won’t lie. I realize it might be procedurally difficult for you to view this, but if you could, I’d appreciate it. There’s no willful disregard of screening directions. No explosion over the discovery of a pair of scissors in a suitcase. No struggle to put handcuffs on. There’s a tired man, early in the morning, unhappily going through a rigorous procedure and then reacting to the tears of his pregnant wife."

Eventually we heard back from a different person, the guy in charge of the TSA airport screeners. One of his employees had made the damning statement about me exploding over her scissor discovery, and the officer had deftly incorporated that statement into his report. We asked the guy if he could find out why she’d said this – couldn’t she possibly be mistaken? "Oh, can’t do that, my hands are tied. It’s kind of like leading a witness – I could get in trouble, heh heh." Then what about the videotape? Why not watch that? That would exonerate me. "Oh, we destroy all video after three days."

Sure you do.

A few days later we heard from him again. He just wanted to inform us that he’d received corroboration of the officer’s report from the officer’s superior, a name we didn’t recognize. "But...he wasn’t even there," my wife said.

"Yeah, well, uh, he’s corroborated it though."

That’s how it works.

"Oh, and we did look at the videotape. Inconclusive."

But I thought it was destroyed?

On and on it went. Due to the tenacity of my wife in making phone calls and speaking with relevant persons, the "crime" was eventually lowered to a mere citation. Only she could have done that. I would’ve simply accepted what was being thrown at me, trumped up charges and all, simply because I’m wholly inadequate at performing the kowtow. There’s no way I could have contacted all the people Mary did and somehow pretend to be contrite. Besides, I speak in a low, forced voice, which doesn’t elicit sympathy. Just police suspicion.

Weeks later at the courthouse I listened to a young DA awkwardly read the charges against me – "Mr. Monahan...umm...shouted obscenities at the airport staff...umm... umm...oh, they took some scissors from his suitcase and he became...umm...abusive at this point." If I was reading about it in Kafka I might have found something vaguely amusing in all of it. But I wasn’t. I was there. Living it.

I entered a plea of nolo contendere, explaining to the judge that if I’d been a resident of Oregon, I would have definitely pled "Not Guilty." However, when that happens, your case automatically goes to a jury trial, and since I lived a thousand miles away, and was slated to return home in seven days, with a newborn due in a matter of weeks...you get the picture. "No Contest" it was. Judgment: $250 fine.

Did I feel happy? Only $250, right? No, I wasn’t happy. I don’t care if it’s twelve cents, that’s money pulled right out of my baby’s mouth and fed to a disgusting legal system that will use it to propagate more incidents like this. But at the very least it was over, right? Wrong.

When we returned to Los Angeles there was an envelope waiting for me from the court. Inside wasn’t a receipt for the money we’d paid. No, it was a letter telling me that what I actually owed was $309 – state assessed court costs, you know. Wouldn’t you think your taxes pay for that – the state putting you on trial? No, taxes are used to hire more cops like the officer, because with our rising criminal population – people like me – hey, your average citizen demands more and more "security."

Finally I reach the piece de resistance. The week before we’d gone to the airport my wife had had her regular pre-natal checkup. The child had settled into the proper head down position for birth, continuing the remarkable pregnancy she’d been having. We returned to Portland on Sunday. On Mary’s Monday appointment she was suddenly told, "Looks like your baby’s gone breech." When she later spoke with her midwives in Los Angeles, they wanted to know if she’d experienced any type of trauma recently, as this often makes a child flip. "As a matter of fact..." she began, recounting the story, explaining how the child inside of her was going absolutely crazy when she was crying as the police were leading me away through the crowd.

My wife had been planning a natural childbirth. She’d read dozens of books, meticulously researched everything, and had finally decided that this was the way for her. No drugs, no numbing of sensations – just that ultimate combination of brute pain and sheer joy that belongs exclusively to mothers. But my wife is also a first-time mother, so she has what is called an "untested" pelvis. Essentially this means that a breech birth is too dangerous to attempt, for both mother and child. Therefore, she’s now relegated to a c-section – hospital stay, epidural, catheter, fetal monitoring, stitches – everything she didn’t want. Her natural birth has become a surgery.

We’ve tried everything to turn that baby. Acupuncture, chiropractic techniques, underwater handstands, elephant walking, moxibustion, bending backwards over pillows, herbs, external manipulation – all to no avail. When I walked into the living room the other night and saw her plaintively cooing with a flashlight turned onto her stomach, yet another suggested technique, my heart almost broke. It’s breaking now as I write these words.

I can never prove that my child went breech because of what happened to us at the airport. But I’ll always believe it. Wrongly or rightly, I’ll forever think of how this man, the personification of this system, has affected the lives of my family and me. When my wife is sliced open, I’ll be thinking of him. When they remove her uterus from her abdomen and lay it on her stomach, I’ll be thinking of him. When I visit her and my child in the hospital instead of having them with me here in our home, I’ll be thinking of him. When I assist her to the bathroom while the incision heals internally, I’ll be thinking of him.

There are plenty of stories like this these days. I don’t know how many I’ve read where the writer describes some breach of civil liberties by employees of the state, then wraps it all up with a dire warning about what we as a nation are becoming, and how if we don’t put an end to it now, then we’re in for heaps of trouble. Well you know what? Nothing’s going to stop the inevitable. There’s no policy change that’s going to save us. There’s no election that’s going to put a halt to the onslaught of tyranny. It’s here already – this country has changed for the worse and will continue to change for the worse. There is now a division between the citizenry and the state. When that state is used as a tool against me, there is no longer any reason why I should owe any allegiance to that state.

And that’s the first thing that child of ours is going to learn.

December 21, 2002

Nick Monahan works in the film industry. He writes out of Los Angeles where he lives with his wife and as of December 18th, his beautiful new son.

Copyright © 2002 LewRockwell.com

     

 

Back to LewRockwell.com Home Page



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: policestate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 1,141-1,147 next last
To: EricOKC
Well, it was a different time. Hijackers were rash, but not suicidal. People did think their best chance of survival was to keep their heads down. They would land somewhere, and someone would talk them out of it.

It is different now... and I don't think the answer is to let guns back on planes now, but it is an idea. Heh. My brother said they could solve the problem by handing everyone a baseball bat when we boarded the plane. I do think that we have changed. Planeloads of passengers are no longer docile. They will fight. They still have their hands, and they no longer will have the illusion that they can survive a hijacking otherwise.

I know exactly how I felt when I last boarded a plane, and I counted the big guys on the plane that looked like they could take on anyone who tried anything.

The next guy to hijack a plane in this country is toast. Whether he just wants to go to Cuba or not.
421 posted on 12/21/2002 5:14:47 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 411 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian Billy Graham
thank you Trent Lott
422 posted on 12/21/2002 5:16:44 PM PST by jd792
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #423 Removed by Moderator

To: FoxPro
I agree with your premise that the passengers have now changed...

But I don't think we abandon airport security. We do have to make it a little bit hard to get on a plane with a weapon and bad intentions. At least we cull the stupid or unlucky ones.
424 posted on 12/21/2002 5:19:19 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 414 | View Replies]

To: EricOKC
If you really think that's all he did, then you didn't read the story very carefully. And what difference would it make to you? You sprained a guy's wrist.
425 posted on 12/21/2002 5:20:48 PM PST by Trust but Verify
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies]

To: The Mayor
I personally will never fly again. I'll drive where ever I have to go..

Airlines are filing for bankruptcy left and right and our incompetent government is largely to blame. Soon people will fly nowhere unless it's on a government owned plane.

426 posted on 12/21/2002 5:21:09 PM PST by SwordofTruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies]

To: Republic of Texas
Yep, and when we look back on where America died, we will see it started with George W. Bush. "Christian", "Conservative", and "Constitutional" Jorge Bush.

Enough's enough. I'm not flying anymore. And I've already resigned myself to the fact that sometime we will need to take arms against a tyrannical government.

427 posted on 12/21/2002 5:21:51 PM PST by fogarty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MonroeDNA
Grrrrrr!

What? How old are you, you whippersnapper?

You are not allowed to growl at me.

428 posted on 12/21/2002 5:22:24 PM PST by carenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

Comment #429 Removed by Moderator

To: Glenn
Bigger picture? Rational discussion? Glenn, people have been waiting for you to post ONE INTELLIGENT THOUGHT on this board. You have been given abundant opportunities to back up your knee-jerk criticisms with some kind of constructive suggestions, yet you have heretofore refused to do so. That's why no no one can take you seriously.For heavens' sake, it's not OUR fault that you come across as a sexually confused tenth grader.
430 posted on 12/21/2002 5:23:48 PM PST by leilani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies]

To: EricOKC
If you really think that's all he did, then you didn't read the story very carefully. And what difference would it make to you? You sprained a guy's wrist.
431 posted on 12/21/2002 5:24:29 PM PST by Trust but Verify
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies]

Comment #432 Removed by Moderator

To: Jeff Gordon
Clicking to your FR homepage does a lot to clarify your attitudes towards people and life.

Your's don't.

433 posted on 12/21/2002 5:28:56 PM PST by carenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies]

To: EricOKC
Excuse me - all he did was ask a question. The simple question of "What did you do to her". This action got him arrested.

That, plus this:

I asked what I could hide in a baseball hat. Yeah. Anything.)...

I began to get pissed off...

My anger increased when...

After some more grumbling on my part they eventually finished...

I marched up to the woman who’d been examining her and shouted, "What did you do to her?"

I demanded to know...

Three of them, cinching my arms...

The whole rest of the piece reeks of general disdain for law enforcement. The guy had disdain for cops and couldn't control his temper. A bad mix for him and his wife. The other side says he was shouting and waving his arms, something about breathing heavy, and he seems to agree in his own writing. I think he was pitching a fit.

434 posted on 12/21/2002 5:30:41 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies]

To: Trust but Verify
Having had two c-sections, I have real problems with his whole statement. His wife was 7-1/2 months pregnant and had a miscarriage before and trouble getting pregnant. I just can't believe a doctor would let her go considering this should be a high risk pregnancy.

Then he states they pull the uterus out - is he crazy - that is NOT a c-section, they only cut the uterus open and PULL out the baby.

Babies flip for no reason at all - emotions have nothing to do with it. My daughter would have been breech but sometime in my 32nd week, she flipped and was head down. I didn't have any emotional scare - she did it on her own. Wouldn't have mattered anyway since this was going to be my second c-section.

He also states that his wife didn't tell him right away what she was crying about. Wonder why? Maybe she knew he would over react and do something stupid.

It is possible security over-reacted but so did he.

435 posted on 12/21/2002 5:31:34 PM PST by BuckeyeOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl; EricOKC; Greybird; Republic of Texas; Chancellor Palpatine
As a bi-Coastal entrepreneur, I have endured the presence of the newly empowered TSA drones and their disrespect for American citizens...especially those of Caucasian ancestry.

I also happen to have an office in the downtown Manhattan, about two blocks from "Ground Zero", as it has been sensationally referred to.

The mindless knee-jerk reaction that has followed 9-11 only typifies the bumbling bureaucracy of government agencies in America that I would expect. The usual increases in fascist police-state tactics, empowering control-freaks whose sole purpose in life is to micro-manage every area of our lives.

Case in point: A couple of months back while on my way to LAX via JFK, I witnessed a 64 year old grandmother being what I could only describe as harassed by airport security types.

After placing her bag through the X-ray machine, security found an antique gold-toothpick in her handbag; a family heirloom passed down through her family from a more noble time in America.

The screeners insisted she surrender her keepsake to them if she wished to enter the terminal, at which she became upset and was asked to step-aside for "further processing". Being slightly irritated by their handling of the grandmother
(a white woman who certainly had no reason to be feared by ANY American citizen), I stepped forward and asked why she was being led away. After I was told to "mind your own business" by a nasty women who spoke broken-English with a Caribbean accent, I asked if it would be possible for this women to return to the ticketing counter to place her heirloom in her luggage.

While the mind-numb screener glared at me, her supervisor thought about it and replied, "If that is satisfactory with her, it sounds OK to me".

The white-haired lady said "yes, it's OK with me" and he released her in the hallway to return to the ticketing/luggage desks. I accompanied her to make sure she was OK.

To make a long story short, the ticketing agent complied with the request and the women was allowed to continue on her trip to see her grandchildren.

IMHO, the whole incident was uncalled for as I don't remember ever hearing of 64 year-old fourth-generation American grandmother being an Islamic terrorist hell-bent on the destruction of anything, have you?

Although Nick Monahan sounds a like another Hollywood liberal new-age kook, he also sounds like a coherent individual who probably isn't prone to violent outbursts. As an American patroit who takes his liberties quite serious, I probably would have done the same or worse in his situation.

Maybe this incident will make him question the morass that has developed from tyrants and anti-patriots that have turned against the Constitution.

There are no atheist or liberals in a foxhole.

OK, I've said my piece...now back to the pissing match.
436 posted on 12/21/2002 5:33:01 PM PST by TaZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: EricOKC
Russia is more free now than America. Kind of ironic dont you think?

Yes, very ironic. I remember reading somewhere where Russia is now the "new frontier", and that they may be actively seeking settlers in the near future. Hell, if this keeps up I'll move.

437 posted on 12/21/2002 5:33:07 PM PST by AK2KX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies]

To: All
Good thing that woman wasn't married to my husband. If I told him that they had done that to me, someone would have gotten punched. And then things would have been much worse.

However, I wouldn't let a stranger feel my breasts or make me pull up my shirt in public. So I guess things would have been even worse that way, too.

Boy, whatta couple we make, huh? LOL!
438 posted on 12/21/2002 5:35:22 PM PST by Morrigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 436 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
I suppose that if you are docile enough by nature that being treated as if you were an inmate in a maximum security lockup for the privilage of getting on one of those flying cattle cars doesn't bother you....

These passenger inspections contribute almost nothing to actual security. Cargo, mantanince and catering staff enter aircraft with only a badge and a set of coveralls for id and no individual searches. The purpose of this nonsense is three fold. First the civil "servants" want to be seen to be doing something. The monkey motion makes the more thoughtless and ignorant willing to get on the "safe" airplane. And, as a friend of mine suggested, our masters now know that Americans will jump through even the stupidest of hoops if they are told to.
439 posted on 12/21/2002 5:37:34 PM PST by Rifleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: EricOKC
3) It would make those of you who are afraid of those mean evil guns uncomfortable

4) It would work. That alone means it will never happen.

I am not afraid of evil guns, I own several and carry one almost always. However, it has not been in my adult lifetime that they have been allowed on planes, so it does seem like a radical idea. I for one, would be hesitant. A planeload full of people is not a typical self-defense shooting situation, and citizens are not trained to shoot in close proximity to 200 other innocents. This is not the lone bad guy coming in my bedroom. I don't know that a gun, in the hands of just anyone, is the right weapon here.

440 posted on 12/21/2002 5:38:02 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 429 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 1,141-1,147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson