THE REAL HILLARY CLINTON: Episode #1 - Paul Fray, F****** Jew B*st*rd

the Internet | 12-21-02 | dfu

[doug from upland]

NOTE: the survival of our Republic is threatened by two things -- fundamentalist Islamic terrorists and Hillary Rodham Clinton. President Bush is leading the fight against the terrorists. It is up to those of us who know the real Hillary Clinton to lead the fight against her. We must shine the light of truth on this dangerous woman so that all Americans may know the real Hillary.

#1 in a series.

Hillary Clinton has again shown to be a liar without conscience. The following is from the New York Post during the 2000 Senate campaign against Rick Lazio.

Hillary Accuser Cleared in Polygraph

NEW YORK, Aug. 22 (UPI) -- The former campaign director who claimed that the first lady called him a "f---ing Jew b------" after Bill Clinton lost his race for Congress 26 years ago passed a lie-detector test arranged by the New York Post.

"I proved it today. I knew I was telling the truth all along. The truth will set you free-and I'm free of this question," Paul Fray told the New York Post after he was informed he had passed the test.

"I don't want the people in the state of New York, and particularly the Jewish community, to attach any undue significance to this," he added. "I want her to win the race. If I was a registered voter in the state of New York, I would vote for her. She will make an excellent senator."

Fray, 57, offered to take a polygraph test to prove he was not lying and the New York Post took him up and his offer and chose Jeff Hubanks, who has administered about 400 to 500 exams, from a list of accredited examiners.

"There's no doubt in my mind that Mr. Fray is truthful," said Hubanks, a state-licensed Arkansas polygrapher, who administered the three-hour test last Sunday in Little Rock, Ark..

The findings were reviewed Monday by another expert, Richard Keifer, a former head of the FBI's polygraph unit with 20 years of experience. Keifer told the Post that he judged the results "inconclusive" because they didn't meet the high federal polygraph standards -- but that he found nothing to indicate Fray was lying.

Keifer said Hubanks relied on a controversial questioning technique that isn't endorsed by the FBI but that it appeared there were no other options in this case to establish a benchmark for measuring Fray's physiological responses. He credited Hubanks for conducting a "professional exam."

Hubanks asked two similar questions to determine if Fray was being truthful about whether Hillary Clinton made the anti-Semitic remark. The questions were: "Did you hear Hillary call you a "f---ing Jew b------?" and "Did you hear Hillary call you a "f---ing Jew b------ in 1974?" Under the FBI's scoring system, Keifer said, Fray's combined answer to two questions about the slur would be evaluated as inconclusive but the rating system used by Hubanks indicated Fray's response is truthful.

"The one thing I didn't see was deception," Keifer said.

Fray's allegation first appeared last month in the book, "State of a Union: Inside the Complex Marriage of Bill and Hillary Clinton," by Jerry Oppenheimer, a celebrity biographer. The book is published by HarperCollins. Oppenheimer wrote that the anti-Semitic slur was uttered by Mrs. Clinton, who was not yet married to the president, on Election night in 1974 in a fight in the back room of Bill Clinton's congressional campaign headquarters in Fayetteville, Arkansas. Fray's wife and a campaign worker, Neil McDonald, both confirmed Fray's account.

The president -- who also was present -- denied last month that his wife made the ethnic slur but conceded the first lady may have used the word "bastard."

The first lady brought the remark to the forefront of her U.S. Senate campaign in New York when she called a news conference on her Chappaqua, N.Y. front lawn last month and angrily and tearfully said "I wanted to unequivocally state it never happened."

"My policy for the last eight years has largely been just to absorb whatever insult, whatever charge, whatever accusation anybody says, and not respond because they are so outrageous and so unfair," Hillary Clinton said. "Anyone who tries to get someone else to believe this will at least have to say, 'Well, she says it's not true.' You're darn right it's not true. It's absolutely false."

Clinton's campaign declined to comment on the polygraph test results.

============================

Three witnesses, one of whom passed a polygraph. Does anyone really believe Hillary and her husband, a known perjurer?

[Lonesome in Massachussets]

They are masters of the clever and precise use of language.

?? I would think quite the opposite. They are masters at obfuscation, ambiguity and sentimentality.

BTW, Mia girl, don't hold it all in. Tell us what you really think.

[Lonesome in Massachussets]

Do you perchance have original sources?

Sorry to disappoint you, but I made up. I thought you could tell. You do your part and make up the sources. You might win a pullet surprise. (Pullet suprise: A "journalism" award bestowed by the Columbia School of Journalism for the most novel invention of facts to buttress arguments popular with the prize committee.)

[Mia T]

Frankly, it does sound like something she would say...With the clintons, farce is reality more often than not...Are you sure it's not some sort of flashback?? ;)

[Mia T]

I agree with you. Oh, they are proficient enough with syntax in a rigid, lawyerly way, but their thinking lacks nuance and depth.

In the final analysis, those two morons singlehandedly decimated the democrat party, allowed the terrorism to metastasize for 8 years, and orchestrated both the '02 democrat debacle and the replacement of a feckless, putatively segregationist, unappealing SML with a telegenic, bright, altruistic, successful, moderate pediatric cardiac surgeon who spends his vacations in Africa operating pro bono on the hearts of black babies. He will appeal to soccer moms and seniors and blacks and all manner of swing voter...Not very smart...

I wonder how long it will take the democrats to figure out that no amount of money raised by the clintons can possibly defray their cost to the democrat party...I wonder how long it will take the democrats to try to cleanse themselves of the clintons...

[Concerned]

THE ARTICLE STATED: "Oppenheimer wrote that the anti-Semitic slur was uttered by Mrs. Clinton, who was not yet married to the president, on Election night in 1974 in a fight in the back room of Bill Clinton's congressional campaign headquarters in Fayetteville, Arkansas. Fray's wife and a campaign worker, Neil McDonald, both confirmed Fray's account."

THE ARTICLE ALSO STATED: "The president -- who also was present -- denied last month that his wife made the ethnic slur but conceded the first lady may have used the word "bastard." "

It never ceases to AMAZE me at how OBVIOUS the answer is to APPARENT KLINTON CONTRADICTIONS. There is NO contradiction!!!!!

Since Bill and Hillary were NOT MARRIED AT THE TIME of the statement, then it was Hillary RODHAM that made the statement, NOT Hillary CLINTON!!!

[Concerned]

THE ARTICLE STATED: "Oppenheimer wrote that the anti-Semitic slur was uttered by Mrs. Clinton, who was not yet married to the president, on Election night in 1974 in a fight in the back room of Bill Clinton's congressional campaign headquarters in Fayetteville, Arkansas. Fray's wife and a campaign worker, Neil McDonald, both confirmed Fray's account."

THE ARTICLE ALSO STATED: "The president -- who also was present -- denied last month that his wife made the ethnic slur but conceded the first lady may have used the word "bastard." "

It never ceases to AMAZE me at how OBVIOUS the answer is to APPARENT KLINTON CONTRADICTIONS. There is NO contradiction!!!!!

Since Bill and Hillary were NOT MARRIED AT THE TIME of the statement, then it was Hillary RODHAM that made the statement, NOT Hillary CLINTON!!!

[doug from upland]

Brilliant work. It is also true what Kendall told us --- the President did not rape Juanita Broaddrick. Of course, he was attorney general at the time.

[timestax]

bumpity uppity

[Concerned]

DOUG FROM UPLAND RESPONDED TO MY COMMENT THAT HILLARY RODHAM---NOT KLINTON---MADE THE FJB REMARK WITH: "Brilliant work."

Thanks! Prior to the Impeachment Hearings, I came up with about 25 "KLINTON-SPEAK" comments which I "TRANSLATED" into English so even the SHEEPLE could understand what the Klintons were REALLY saying when they APPARENTLY denied something. I'll see if I can find it again. It made things SOOOOOOO CLEAR.

DOUG FROM UPLAND ADDED: "It is also true what Kendall told us --- the President did not rape Juanita Broaddrick. Of course, he was attorney general at the time."

EXACTLY!!! I am pretty certain that PRESIDENT KLINTON NEVER raped Juanita, BUT I am about 99.99999% certain ATTY GENERAL KLINTON DID!

[doug from upland]

Awesome work, as usual.

[doug from upland]

bringing this back

[HangUpNow]

Let’s bump this hard.

[HangUpNow]

WHERE IS THE MEDIA?? HAVE THEY SELECTIVE AMNESIA AGAIN?? NEW YORK, Aug. 22 (UPI) -- The former campaign director who claimed that the first lady [Hillary Clinton] called him a "fu***ing Jew bast**d" after Bill Clinton lost his race for Congress 26 years ago passed a lie-detector test arranged by the New York Post.

"I proved it today. I knew I was telling the truth all along. The truth will set you free-and I'm free of this question," Paul Fray told the New York Post after he was informed he had passed the test.