Posted on 01/06/2003 8:33:03 AM PST by Sabertooth
< -snip- >
Want to make it harder for terrorists to acquire the bona fides of a solid citizen? Good luck. Across America, an alliance of immigration advocacy groups, state bureaucracies, local school boards, law enforcement, the Democratic Party and a substantial chunk of the Republican Party (including the President) is wedded to the notion that the best way to deal with the country's vast army of the "undocumented" is to turn a blind eye when they come to the DMV wicket -- and that way they'll all gradually acquire their documents, and be eligible for welfare, education, health care and ultimately to vote for the Democrats in large numbers and (so Bush dreams) for the Republicans in small but significant numbers.
"Salvador Martinez-Gonzalez" has been arrested and is being held on immigration violations. One wonders, however, why the Bush Administration is (belatedly) concerned about an Illegal breaching security in the Presidential residence, yet President Bush doesn't seem to mind much when Illegals are crowding our neighborhoods, street corners, towns, cities, and States.
President Bush got his reputation for being soft on Illegal Aliens the old fashioned way:
He earned it.
From his opposition to California's Proposition #187, to offering goodies to Illegals while he was Governor of Texas, to courting Mexico's Presidente Vicente Fox with visions of Amnesty (or "regularizing," or "normalizing," or "making their work legal") for Mexico's 4 million (at least, and counting) Illegal Aliens, to surreptitiously trying to push through an extension of Bill Clinton's Section 245(i) Amnesty scam for selected Illegals at the expense of lawful immigration applicants, President George W. Bush has, by his policies and pronouncements, assiduously cultivated an image as a malfeasant do-nothing in dealing with Illegals.
Now, with the Senate, the House, and the Presidency in GOP hands, Bush no longer has Tom Daschle to use as an alibi. It's put up or shut up time for the Republicans, and our President.
It's to early to start talking like that. President Bush and the GOP have an eighteen month opportunity to get on the right track. If you jump off the wagon now, they have no reason to steer in the direction in which you'd like them to go.
That's all well and good, but I see no evidence they would steer the wagon in the direction I want to go (scaling back the welfare state) if you held red-hot pokers to their heads.
But rest assured, the "American people" will be the ones accused of ciminality and sent to jail.
I urge everyone to form the bones of a chicken into a pyramid, sprinkle pepper on it, and put it in the window sill in order to make the harmonics converge.
We can never have enough of these plans.
For once, would SOMEONE from the Tancredo crowd please quit bashing Bush for a moment and tell me exactly WHAT that guy proposes as a SOLUTION to the problems of: 1) Illegal immigration (and explain the impact on our budget of such actions, such as use of the military)
2) Legal immigration (and explain the impact of restrictions of rights on our legal citizens and visitors)
3) Terrorism (that doesn't involve further breaching or suspending our Constitutional protections).
Maybe if someone could articulate this, we could send the information to our administration team for their consideration instead of vague threats.
As far as I am concerned, the issue involves an exquisite balance; it is a matter of law as well as politics, principle versus practicality. No matter what, based on their own personal agenda, someone is going to be peeved with the decisions of the current administration. I happen to ADORE President Bush, and while I was also leery of how the immigration issue was handled prior to 9/11, I believe that our President (and his political advisors) well know how to assess the risks of our previous policy. And by continuing to slap them in the face by urging a vote for a one-issue wonder is nothing short of political suicide. If you want to guarantee a disastrous Democrat in the WH again, go ahead and pump Tancredo. Me, I prefer to let our masterful team know that I will support whatever efforts they make to curb the problems without making this country into a socialist nanny state governed by the para-military wannabes. (End of rant, and donning flame-proof suit now!)
No, it's worse. It's an alliance of corporate business types who want cheap labor and Dem activists who want the votes of poor people. I attended an immigration conference sponsored by David Horowitz last year. Grover Norquist (the conservative who runs the Americans for Tax Reform and a pro-immigration shill) talked about being at a White House meeting of business groups, ALL of whom wanted expanded immigration. Very few GOPers have the backbone to tell the corporate interests to take a flying leap.
The situation will NOT change until there is a POLITICAL movement -- like the NRA, the eco-wackos and pro-life -- that DEFEATS OFFICEHOLDERS. Right now you have a million little groups run off of grandma's kitchen table and the think tank Center for Immigration Studies and that's IT!!! Until you make congressmen feel the heat, they won't see the light. (And it's useless to tell them immigration is what changed California from GOP to Dem, as they all smugly think "well, it can't happen in my state." Throw a couple of these immigration apologists out of office and see how fast the rest of them figure it out.)
"Want to make it harder for terrorists to acquire the bona fides of a solid citizen? Good luck. Across America, an alliance of immigration advocacy groups, state bureaucracies, local school boards, law enforcement, the Democratic Party and a substantial chunk of the Republican Party (including the President) is wedded to the notion that the best way to deal with the country's vast army of the "undocumented" is to turn a blind eye when they come to the DMV wicket -- and that way they'll all gradually acquire their documents, and be eligible for welfare, education, health care and ultimately to vote for the Democrats in large numbers and (so Bush dreams) for the Republicans in small but significant numbers."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.