Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ritter Says He Won't Be Silenced
Albany Times Union ^ | January 23, 2003 | Alan Wechsler

Posted on 01/23/2003 11:21:11 AM PST by Shermy

Scott Ritter said he doesn't want forgiveness.

Speaking publicly for the first time about the sex charge he was arrested for in 2001, the former U.N. arms inspector and one of the leading critics of the Bush administration's plans to attack Iraq said he has been held accountable for breaking the law. And it would be a shame, he said Wednesday, that his arrest could derail his efforts to help prevent a war in the Middle East.

"I think it's important to put a human face on this, to remind people that there are issues out there bigger than a two-year-old dismissed case," he said. "I'm not asking people for forgiveness.

In June 2001, he was charged in a police sting operation with trying to lure a 16-year-old girl he met on the Internet to a Burger King. Later in Colonie Town Court, the case was adjourned in contemplation of dismissal after six months. Half a year later, the case was sealed.

"I was arrested on June 15 (2001) and charged with a class B misdemeanor," he said. "I think it's important for people to know that I stood before a judge in a public court, with my wife by my side ... and the case was dismissed."

Ritter, 41, a Delmar resident, spent Wednesday afternoon in a frenzy of television and newspaper interviews. He had been at the center of a national controversy that exploded this week when the arrest came to light.

A former Marine, Ritter served as a U.N. weapons inspector for seven years. He resigned in 1998, saying that Iraq remained a threat. He also accused the United States of damaging the inspection process by using intelligence from the U.N. to determine subsequent bombing sites.

In September, Ritter visited Iraq to urge Saddam Hussein to allow inspectors back into the country. Hussein agreed to do that a few days after Ritter left.

On Wednesday, Ritter said he's trying to put his life back together after the attention of the last few days. He declined to speculate on who may have released information from the sealed file.

"The timing is definitely suspicious," he said. "I have no insights as to who or why. I know what the impact is, which was to prevent me from getting on an airplane as I planned to do so ... to fly to Baghdad."

Ritter was to fly to Iraq on Tuesday to meet with the country's government, along with many other figures in the peace movement, to help avoid a war. Ritter bowed out of the trip because of the recent attention.

Colonie police Chief John Grebert said he did not blame any of his staff for the controversy. Though the case was sealed, he said, his detectives were not barred from talking about it, according to two lawyers he consulted. Furthermore, the case had been reported on Channel 13 in 2001 and many people were already familiar with it.

"This case is going on two years old," he said. "This case has been discussed fairly openly over the past year. A person who becomes more and more of a public figure increases the chance that anyone's going to talk."

WNYT Ch. 13 had the story on the arrest in 2001, but did not identify the man charged as the former weapons inspector. The station has said Ritter was charged under his given name -- William S. Ritter -- and the station did not make the connection at the time.

Ritter said this would be the last time he plans to discuss the situation with the media. He said he has been encouraged by hundreds of positive e-mails from around the country. His family is also with him.

"I'm very supportive of Scott, 100 percent or more," said his wife, Marina. "I'm very proud of him and everything that he has achieved."

Ritter and Marina, who married 12 years ago after they met in the former Soviet Republic of Georgia, are parents of two young children. Ritter said it was difficult explaining to his kids about what happened, but expects to soon put this behind him.

"I will continue to speak where I'm invited and permitted to speak," he said. "This will not silence me."

Staff writer Mike Goodwin contributed to this report.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: agesexlocation; armsinspectors; buhbye; burgerking; conspiracy; hesdone; heybaby; heyheygoodbye; holdthepickle; inspectmyhd; inspectthis; internet; iraq; irrelevantvoice; itsjustsex; jailbait; kiddydiddler; legsinspectors; letschatnow; nananana; oncebittentwiceshy; pervymclickspittle; ritter; scottfree; scottritter; sex; sexchats; sexfriesvideotape; stickaforkinhim; traitor; un; unarmsinspectors; underage; uninspector; vrwc; wantsomecandy; whatruwearing; wmd; yobabyyobabyyo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-183 next last
To: TXnMA
Here's my take on the "Ritter flip-flop": Hussein et al took a lesson from the Klintons: plain old blackmail.

Yep...I even think they are in kahoots to a degree. The Clintons also received $$$ after 9/11 from OBL's family!
161 posted on 01/23/2003 4:11:48 PM PST by Domestic Church (follow the socialist money trail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
He may not be silenced but he won't be heard. His credibility is GONE and no one will listen to his obviously lying rants!

162 posted on 01/23/2003 4:12:16 PM PST by lawdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan
I'm starting to wonder what Hussein has on Blix now!
163 posted on 01/23/2003 4:33:09 PM PST by Domestic Church (follow the socialist money trail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Deb
"With all the Democrat party buddies Saddam has, nothing would surprise me."

BINGO!
164 posted on 01/23/2003 4:35:22 PM PST by Domestic Church (follow the socialist money trail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
"If they know as much about him as I suspect they do, they could destroy him right now. If so, I also suspect they would rather use that info to turn him if at all possible."

Or he is a dead man walking (Saddam's not going to just stop payments...he's more thorough than that) and they are throwing out a life line which will benefit them.
165 posted on 01/23/2003 4:42:54 PM PST by Domestic Church (follow the socialist money trail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Domestic Church
Check this WND story
166 posted on 01/23/2003 6:29:50 PM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
In the latest MSNBC article, Ritter is quoted: "I was, am and always will be an authority on issues pertaining to Iraq."

Scotty ought to look up "narcissism" in the dictionary.

167 posted on 01/23/2003 7:24:20 PM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw; leadpenny
I'm too pooped to see if this is already posted:

"MEDIA MATTERS
CNN admits sitting on Ritter story
'We'd rather be a little slow and 100 percent right'
Posted: January 23, 2003
3:52 a.m. Eastern
© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com
Cable News Network, which markets itself as "the world's news leader," says it sat on the Scott Ritter sex-scandal story for several days without a whisper of it, and other major news outlets have avoided extensive coverage – if any coverage – as well.

The former weapons inspector admitted on CNN's "Newsnight with Aaron Brown" program last night that he was in fact arrested in June 2001, but he refused to disclose if it had to do with allegations he was looking to meet underage girls from the Internet.

"For a couple of days we knew about the allegation and did not report it," said Brown at the top of his show. "Lots of notes [were sent] to us this week about why we were silent. Many – not all, but many assumed it was a political decision because some people see everything that way."

The Schenectady Daily Gazette and New York Daily News originally reported on Saturday and Sunday respectively that Ritter allegedly had an online sexual discussion with someone he thought was an underage girl. The "girl," however, turned out to be an undercover police investigator, according to the Daily News, whose sources spoke on condition of anonymity.

But the story has failed to gain much national publicity until now. In fact, a document search using the Lexis-Nexis archive system reveals the Associated Press national wire has still not published the Ritter sex scandal as of the posting of this article. The story has only hit the local and state AP wire in New York.

It has received coverage among Albany, N.Y., area media, and a few mentions on national programs such as the Rush Limbaugh radio show, and "Buchanan and Press" on MSNBC, which discussed the matter briefly yesterday with the news director of WNYT-TV, the station which had footage of Ritter's mug shot.

WorldNetDaily has done at least four stories following Ritter since the news broke last weekend.

CNN's Brown did provide an explanation as to the delay in the network's reporting of the matter:

"Whenever it's possible," said Brown, "we don't report what we, CNN, cannot confirm. In the case of the Ritter story, we worked it for a couple of days, trying to find the facts, but we were not willing to run with someone else's reporting.

"We needed to find sources. We needed to vet them as best we can. And when we as an organization are comfortable with what we know, then we report it. Now, it's not perfect. Sometimes we do rely on other reporting if we're unable to get to an area, for example.

"Sometimes we report what others have with an acknowledgment that the story is based on someone's other work, according to AP or according to 'The New York Times.' But that is more the exception than the rule. We do it because we are responsible for what we put on the air. It's really that simple.

"We have rules and standards. We know them, we're comfortable with them. Even when it means we sometimes get beat on a story. We'd rather be a little slow and 100 percent right."

168 posted on 01/23/2003 8:07:37 PM PST by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
I read the WND story. However, this doesn't explain why Fox News hasn't covered this story in depth (I've seen a restatement of previously published stories, references to it on Brit Hume's Grapevine and discussion about it on Fox & Friends, but they haven't done a truly independent story of their own on it) or why Fox News hasn't gotten an interview with Ritter. I expected more from Fox. (I'm not even mentioning MSNBC, because, frankly, who cares.)

Right after this story broke, I said that other news agencies would wait until the courts and other offices were open (Tuesday) to independently verify the story before they went it. And I was right--at least as far as CNN goes, but so far, Fox News has been all but MIA on this as a story. So far, only CNN has gotten the interview (I call the Catherine Crier "interview" with Ritter yesterday more of a smoochfest), and much to Ritter's surprise, Aaron Brown did a quiet, but devastating interview with Ritter. And I didn't see Ritter on any cable shows today (a rehash of Aaron Brown's interview was shown this morning & it was discussed on Fox & Friends), much less on any network news.

169 posted on 01/23/2003 8:21:52 PM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan
Thanks for the link to "Scott Ritter in his own words".
170 posted on 01/23/2003 8:38:02 PM PST by Sloopy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
Scotty ought to look up "narcissism" in the dictionary.

There is such a thing as "Narcissist Personality Disorder", and he fits the description. I find it scary that a guy with this dysfunctional of a personality rose to such a position.

Also, this guy is supposed to be an INTELLIGENCE agent, and he fell for a local sting operation, not once but TWICE?

171 posted on 01/23/2003 9:04:01 PM PST by Sloopy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Sloopy
We had a client who was married to a guy with narcissist personality disorder, as well as a rage disorder (which also fits Ritter). I'm far too familiar with both.
172 posted on 01/24/2003 4:45:38 AM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Of course this pawn won't be silenced, but there is not a thing he can do about being ignored.
173 posted on 01/24/2003 5:41:11 AM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
"I'm very supportive of Scott, 100 percent or more," said his wife, Marina. "I'm very proud of him and everything that he has achieved."

She is rumored to be KGB.

Maybe Ritter and Michael Jackson will open a consulting business together.

174 posted on 01/24/2003 5:45:33 AM PST by Rome2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
We had a client who was married to a guy with narcissist personality disorder, as well as a rage disorder (which also fits Ritter). I'm far too familiar with both.

Yeah, I think I know one of these narcissists, so I've been reading up.

175 posted on 01/24/2003 6:04:04 AM PST by Sloopy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
"I will continue to speak where I'm invited and permitted to speak," he said. "This will not silence me."

As long as he speaks from his cell, I'm all for the 1st Amendment.

176 posted on 01/24/2003 7:58:22 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
In the latest MSNBC article, Ritter is quoted: "I was, am and always will be an authority on issues pertaining to Iraq."

He's also an authority on pedophilia, so if anyone has any questions about that, or about R.Kelly or Pete Townsend please give Scott a call.

177 posted on 01/24/2003 8:06:17 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: dead
Actually, you are wrong. Back in the 1988 campaign, the VP of the Libertarian party gave a speech in support of legalizing man-boy sex. The party platform back then supported legalizing all consensual sex, regardless of age (among other things). If that is not pedophilia, I don't know what is. The latest platform has toned that down a bit, but all you have to do is claim you are a Libertarian and other ones will defend you NO MATTER WHAT YOU HAVE DONE.
178 posted on 01/24/2003 9:42:12 AM PST by jim_trent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
From your link: "Last December, it was reported that the State Department and U.N. – without any background check – selected a munitions expert for the inspection team who had no specialized scientific degree and a leadership role in sadomasochistic sex clubs... A leading Iraq observer, Laurie Mylroie, who also serves as a Defense Department consultant, told WND that the best explanation for Ritter's reversal that she has heard is that, after he resigned and spoke out on Saddam's threat before the Senate, the Clinton administration turned on him."

She then speaks of the FBI going for the jugular on Ritter. So there has to been a Clinton-Saddam link as I had suspected...it's all too convenient that 9/11 occurred followed by the Venezuelan, North Korean and Iraqi flare-ups just after a Republican takes control of the White House. The Democrats are as much an enemy as Saddam! We could again be in a civil war here in the near future. Wake up America!!!
179 posted on 01/24/2003 9:46:36 AM PST by Domestic Church (follow the socialist money trail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Ritter's wife probably could identify with Mrs. Oswald we she found out what a loser she married.
180 posted on 01/24/2003 9:48:52 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-183 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson