Posted on 01/25/2003 2:21:31 PM PST by Mia T
January 25, 2003 -- Hillary Rodham Clinton yesterday delivered herself of a blistering attack on the Bush administration's national-security policy:
"Time has passed and our vigilance has faded," claimed New York's junior senator. "We have relied on a myth of homeland security - a myth written in rhetoric, inadequate resources and a new bureaucracy, instead of relying on good, old-fashioned American ingenuity, might and muscle."
Hmmm. What to make of that?
Well, not to visit the sins of the husband on the wife - okay, maybe a little bit - but let the record show that the first attack on the World Trade Center took place in 1993, two months into the Clinton co-presidency.
And, as Rep. Peter King (R-Long Island) noted yesterday, "[After the first attack], nobody from the Clinton administration, including the president himself, ever even came to New York to visit the site, and they did nothing from 1993 until they left office to protect New York."
The contrast with the current administration couldn't be more stark.
For the record also shows that the previous administration did little to respond to subsequent attacks on U.S. interests: the Khobar Towers marine barracks in Saudi Arabia in 1995, the two U.S. embassies in Africa in 1998, USS Cole in Yemen in 2000.
Again, contrast that with the current administration's response - both in Afghanistan and across the world in the broader war on terror.
Certainly looks like "old-fashioned American ingenuity, might and muscle" to us. But what about the "new bureaucracy" that Mrs. Clinton so scathingly condemns?
Well, first, it was the Democrats who got out in front and demanded the creation of a Department of Homeland Security - and then blocked it for months afterwards in a happily failed attempt to lard up that bureaucracy with union-protecting language.
Sen. Clinton has, as the saying goes, a right to her opinion. What she doesn't have is a right to her own set of facts.
And the fact is, the previous administration - in which she held a significant behind-the-scenes role, and from which her current position devolves - failed to respond forcefully enough when American interests were attacked, both at home and abroad.
The Democratic Party, as a whole, has scant standing to criticize the efforts of the current administration regarding national security.
Mrs. Clinton, individually, has none.
|
|||||
|
Yes, it was prescient of GHWB. He put an even finer point on it in some other campaign speech that year; if I can find it, I'll post it. In the meantime, you can find the audio clip HERE, if you want to add it to the archives.
Good morning Mia.
5.56mm
"...And, lastly, the other night on character Governor Clinton said it's not the character of the president but the character of the presidency. I couldn't disagree more. Horace Greeley said the only thing that endures is character. And I think it was Justice Black who talked about great nations, like great men, must keep their word.
And so the question is, who will safeguard this nation, who will safeguard our people and our children? I need your support, I ask for your support. And may God bless the United States of America."
10 posted on 01/25/2003 5:52 PM EST by Cloud William
Thanks so much for finding the GHWBush sound clip. I've added it to the SpyLies and Audiotape flashmovie. It provides the perfect parallel-universe-"if only we had listened" ending. G.H.W. Bush identified the danger of the clintons precisely. There is no doubt that not heeding his warning will go down in history as America's biggest blunder -- unless, of course, America is dysfunctional enough--or dumb enough--to submit to "sleaze, the sequel." Happily, this will not happen, in my view. 9-11 changed the calculus. We must remember that even the lowest forms of life have a survival instinct.
*Thanx to Cloud William for text and audio
|
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.