Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shuttle explodes Over Texas
USA TODAY ^ | 2/01/03 | AP

Posted on 02/01/2003 6:56:54 AM PST by kattracks

Edited on 04/13/2004 1:40:20 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

CAPE CANAVERAL (AP)

(Excerpt) Read more at usatoday.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: columbiatragedy; feb12003; india; israel; nasa; spaceshuttle; unitedstates
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-226 next last
To: Cicero
Some links for your consideration:

Instapundit is on the job:

http://www.instapundit.com/archives/007196.php#007196

Rand Simberg is also on the job:

http://www.interglobal.org/weblog/archives/002063.html#002063

NOAA's weather radar image of the Columbia break up

http://weather.noaa.gov/radar/latest/DS.p19r0/si.kshv.shtml

KHOU has pictures of the Shuttle Debris on its web site here:

http://www.khou.com/topstories/khou030201_ds_ShuttleDebris.10bac482.html

And the Winds of Change.net web log:

http://windsofchange.net/archives/002995.html

201 posted on 02/01/2003 10:19:35 AM PST by Dark Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Dark Wing
NOAA's weather radar image of the Columbia break up

Of course, everyone should remember that this link is to a *live* image and is constatntly being updated ... so slowly the depiction of a track from northwest to southwest (as is currently being shown as of this writing) south of Shreveport will continue to change ... also note: on the 'looped' version of this image the entire track continues to move east.

202 posted on 02/01/2003 10:34:48 AM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: whenigettime
I wonder if any one was hit on the ground,

Four people are reported to have checked in to Nacdoches Memorial hospital ... no further details ...

Local paper for Nacogdoches, Tx:

http://www.dailysentinel.com/

203 posted on 02/01/2003 10:42:32 AM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Positive
The Challenger event was not so much an "explosion" as it was a large-scale ignition -- it was comparable to the difference between a car that "explodes" with a full gas tank and one that explodes with a nearly-empty one. The shuttle itself appeared to break up primarily as a result of the friction forces that resulted when it was no longer flying forward.
204 posted on 02/01/2003 10:54:05 AM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
In today's instance it is not likely to be an explosion (unless the high inflation pressure in the tire let go - or the signals from that link suggested something in addition to tire pressure) but disintegration within such a short period of time that it sounded like one.

On landing the shuttle is a great big glider, and not a very agile one. Little or no fuel as such is in play or on board. Computers keep it aligned during all the critical phases, when heat and pressure are worst danger. Any lapse in that alignment greatly increases stress and any sudden loss of integrity (wheel door bulging or being bumped open?)could cause large sections to grab air and begin to tear away. Once started, no way to recover and shuttle would break up much as it appears to have done.

Almost no chance of terrorism or sabotage. Carelessness maybe, freak event probably, time to come up with a new shuttle design - about ten years ago.

205 posted on 02/01/2003 11:04:51 AM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
Here are the facts as we know it so far from the left, from the phony liberal news as it adopts “the party line”, and from the world in general:

1) It’s Bush’s fault.

2) The Palestinians are dancing in the streets – another Jew is dead, Americans are dead, another blow to the infidels.

3) It’s Bush’s fault, because of tax cuts.

4) If incompetence is found, it’s the fault of the Republican agenda for not supporting our public schools.

5) It’s Bush’s fault, because of tax cuts, and for not supporting our public schools.

6) It’s Bush’s fault. And, how dare we be so unseemly to even consider aggression against Iraq at this time of national mourning?

7) Funding for science and technology should be for progress, not for war. It’s Bush’s fault. It’s his fault because of matter of perspective. Because of values, about the direction of science and technology. That’s why the shuttle blew up. Because we value war.

8) But, maybe this is all for good. We have to ask ourselves, what did we do to cause this? Of course, there will be an independent investigation to find this out. The focus of the investigation will be two sides: the side saying it’s Bush’s fault, and the side which will be pigeon-holed into saying it isn’t Bush’s fault and they don’t beat their wives. After the report is filled, no one will read it.

9) The Black Muslims will say it was the great wheel in the sky that brings down fire on the blue-eyed devils who are the enemies of Islam. This is the same great wheel that was suppose to come down in 1968 in a field not far from Chicago, where thousands of blacks were bused from all over the North East came and awaited for the wheel which would pick them up, and on the way out to space would kill all the blue-eyed devils with the death ray. None of this will be reported, but somewhere in all of this the leader of this domestic terrorist group, Louie the accordion player, will be called a “statesman”. It’s all Bush’s fault, and Louie is a statesman.

10) The statesman Jimmy Carter revels that it’s all Bush’s fault.

11) The statesman Nelson Mandella will revel that it’s all Bush’s fault. That the greatest perpetrator of murder is America. That Bush can’t think straight. That’s it’s all Bush’s fault. He will be called a statesman for saying all of this, but you won’t hear any of Nelson’s direct quotes in the media. Except, he’s a statesman, and Bush is not. And now this has happened. And, it’s Bush’s fault.

12) The statesman Al Gore revels that it’s all Bush’s fault.

13) The Republican statesman McCain will revel that it’s “sort’a” Bush’s fault.

14) All statesman agree. It’s Bush’s fault.

15) There are no illegal aliens involved.

16) The Black Muslims may have some answers to our problems in America. This is only one revelation. Now is the time to dance in the streets with the Palestinians. And, to divest Israel. Because, it’s, well, Israel’s fault. And Bush’s.

206 posted on 02/01/2003 11:07:07 AM PST by Brian_Baldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: stanz
Some friends were over and we were discussing the Challenger last night.

God, this is terrible.

207 posted on 02/01/2003 11:09:15 AM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas
We live in interesting times. We make amazing advances and suffer amazing sorrows. As terrible as this is, today we are one. If only we could always be. This too shall pass.
208 posted on 02/01/2003 11:19:35 AM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
This too shall pass, but as I said back in 1986 after the Challenger disaster . . .

"It's going to happen again someday."

209 posted on 02/01/2003 11:32:07 AM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Live Video Streams:
BBC World: http://202.174.129.100/bbc300k
BBC News 24: http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsa/n5ctrl/live/now2.ram
CTV NewsNet: http://ctvbroadcast.ctv.ca/ctvlivehigh.asf
WFAA/Dallas (ABC): http://playlist.yahoo.com/makeplaylist.dll?id=5882
KHOU/Houston (CBS): http://playlist.yahoo.com/makeplaylist.dll?id=206531
NBC; NASA TV; MSNBC; KXAS/Dallas: http://www.msnbc.com/m/lv/default.asp?0cv=CA01
WKMG/Orlando-Daytona Beach: http://mfile.akamai.com/7882/live/reflector:23942.ram
WSVN/Miami: http://web2.wsvn.com/video/wsvn_broadband.asx
CNN/Newsnet - Raw Video (IBSYS News Sites): http://mfile.akamai.com/7882/live/reflector:23961.ram
WHDH/Boston - http://www.whdh.com/video/
CBS News - http://cgi.cbs.com/video/video.pl?url=/broadcast/*/livenews.rm&plugin=1&proto=rtsp
StarNews India: http://www.ndtv.com/live/livevideo.asx

210 posted on 02/01/2003 11:34:47 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Yes it will. But overall since the Mercury flights, we have been very fortunate. Some day our children will fly into space and back on vacation. These people paved the way. As I said to someone else, they will be national heros centuries from now.
211 posted on 02/01/2003 11:43:47 AM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child; chiller; jnarcus
Risk-wise NASA counted on a loss of 1 in 50 shuttle flights when the program was originally conceived. The risk has certainly gone down significantly in the wake of Challenger, but we were probably overdue. I have found a more recent briefing which indicates the loss rate is now calculated to be 1 in 250 as of 2002 which is an amazing number as far as space launch is concerned. I think we are well over 150 flights now. Their aim at the time of the briefing was 1 in 500 by 2012. Here's the link.

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/codeq/safetydir/Wednesday/stamatelatos.pdf

It truly is rocket science.
212 posted on 02/01/2003 12:35:01 PM PST by Rockitz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
'The shuttle was carrying the first Israeli astronaut and six Americans, and authorities had feared it would be a terrorist target.'

I believe that they were correct.

I seriously doubt it. Considering how expensive and valuable the space shuttles are, I bet there is as much security surrounding them as there are around nuclear weapons. If terrorists were able to penetrate the security of the space programs, I'm sure they would also be able to have penetrated the security of bases where nuclear weapons are stored.

213 posted on 02/01/2003 1:38:27 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: txflake
We were discussing the Challenger during the week. I remember being home from work that day with a sinus infection. It was Jan. 28th. After learning of the tragedy and hearing of the unfolding news, I recall that all the tears made my condition much worse - - couldn't breathe. Took medication which made me like a zombie and together with the events of the day, it was all so surreal.
Today brought it all back again. So very sad.
214 posted on 02/01/2003 2:21:15 PM PST by stanz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: SMEDLEYBUTLER; Sweet_Sunflower29; seams2me
I wrote:
"All this "if you find a piece of the debris don't touch it because it may be toxic" stuff is ridiculous"

I stand corrected.
At the time, I figured it was a ruse to dissuade people from grabbing "souvenirs", and I thought it was an inappropriate thing to be concerned about given the scope of the tragedy.
Turned out it was no ruse - - some of the debris could indeed have toxic residue.

Regards,
LH

215 posted on 02/01/2003 2:35:07 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
I seriously doubt it.

I did too as more info came in about the circumstances....

However, I have just learned, as reported on FoxNews Channel, that Ilan Ramon was one of the pilots involved in the bombing of the Iraqi nuclear plant.

I am now again, suspicious. Too many coincidences.

216 posted on 02/01/2003 2:51:20 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: DonnerT
"No one is even attempting to identify which part a piece might be. It would not surprise me to eventually learn that parts are strewn from california to Florida."

My oldest son lives in Paulden, AZ. His wife called this morning to tell me that they saw it begin to break up over Arizona. He called 911 and reported what details he could give them.

We are praying for the families of these heroes. May God be with them and give them comfort.

217 posted on 02/01/2003 4:54:41 PM PST by redhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Irene Adler
True, except that the equipment is getting older and suffering more wear and tear (even considering lots of careful maintenance and repair) plus the technology isn't really new, anymore, either. So... perhaps the odds really DO begin to change (worsen) with repeated trials in this situation.

I would agree but I own an '85 Chevy Astro Van and have taken it on several LONG trips from Florida to Ohio and back.

The odds of my old van breaking down are GREAT, yet it has always gotten me there, and on the way we passed several NEW cars broken down at the side of the road.

So I would say the ODDS do not worsen.

218 posted on 02/01/2003 9:15:28 PM PST by md2576 (Merritt Is./Cape Canaveral Florida)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
"My mom called and woke me up to tell me about this. From the spiraling reports on Drudge I'm guessing some aerodynamic instability- maybe damage to a control surface that made the vehicle uncontrollable. I'm guessing we we'll be doing CFD analyses to see what defect in the control surfaces could cause loss of control."

Well now I don't think a bomb. I'm leaning toward loss of one or more leading-edge (black) tiles on the wing and catastrophic melting leading to failure. In other words the thermal loads with lack of tiles.

This was inevitable; the shuttle fleet was ageing. Remember the "jokes" that said you don't want to be on the first 5 flights (infant mortality) or the last 5 (airframe age)? Trouble was, nobody knew how to figure out how many actual flights were the "last 5". Now we have 3 vehicles and they will be lost one by one as they age.

Memo to NASA: maybe now is a good time to think about replacing the STS. Maybe rethink man's role in space. Personally--and it rips me to say it--I have come to believe we are better off not risking human life unless we are going to send people to Mars or the Moon. We need to stop "studying" replacements and get serious about retiring the fleet.

--Boris

219 posted on 02/01/2003 10:33:08 PM PST by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
"The Challenger event was not so much an "explosion" as it was a large-scale ignition -- it was comparable to the difference between a car that "explodes" with a full gas tank and one that explodes with a nearly-empty one. The shuttle itself appeared to break up primarily as a result of the friction forces that resulted when it was no longer flying forward."

I'm a liquid-rocket person. After Challenger, a colleague reported to me that a Thiokol guy had made a remark at a technical meeting: "This is the end of liquid rockets."

"Huh?"

"Well, if you guys didn't have that big explosive tank of propellants hanging there, the solid leak would be no big deal."

"Uh, let me get this straight. Suppose one of the SSMEs had flung a turbine blade and it penetrated one of the solid boosters, causing a catastrophic failure. Whose fault would that be?"

"Yours." (liquids).

"I see. So all failures are the fault of liquid engines, right?"

--Boris

220 posted on 02/01/2003 10:46:06 PM PST by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-226 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson