Posted on 02/05/2003 8:50:45 PM PST by hocndoc
February 5, 2003
Christopher Reeve Republicans
WASHINGTON -- While President Bush's call for a federal ban on human cloning will bring no immediate congressional action, the New Jersey Legislature is moving at breakneck speed toward legalization. What's more, the state's Republican legislators are not impeding this rush toward passage, ignoring admonitions from the White House.
When the cloning bill passed the state Senate (evenly divided between Democrats and Republicans) late last year, not a single GOP senator voted no. A committee of the Democratic-controlled state Assembly unanimously approved the bill Monday, Republicans abstaining. With the GOP offering no opposition, the full Assembly is expected to pass the bill as early as next Monday and send it to Democratic Gov. James McGreevey. When he signs it, New Jersey would become the only state where human cloning is expressly legal.
"If New Jersey passes this legislation," said Marie Tasy of the state's Right to Life organization, which has led the opposition, "the Raelians should feel comfortable calling New Jersey home and setting up cloning labs in the Garden State." The bizarre is familiar in Trenton, where conflict-of-interest is common among state legislators, and Republicans are divided and leaderless. GOP legislators protest that the issue is too complicated to understand. They are clear, however, in not wanting to get on the wrong side of the bill's most visible advocate, paralyzed actor Christopher Reeve.
Republican lawmakers may be confused by claims from the bill's sponsors that it actually bans human cloning. They should read the Jan. 27 letter to Gov. McGreevey by four members of the President's Council on Bioethics (Robert George of Princeton, Alfonso Gomez-Lobo of Georgetown, William Hurlbut of Stanford and Gilbert Meilaender of Valparaiso University). They contend the bill "expressly authorizes the creation of new human beings by cloning" and "threatens to make New Jersey a haven for unethical medical practices, including the macabre practice of human fetal farming."
This measure would permit "somatic cell nuclear transfer" (SCNT) -- a process used in making a human clone. While supporters argue this is not cloning, the President's Council disagrees -- unanimously. It reported last summer that "the product of 'SCNT' is not only an embryo; it is also a clone, genetically virtually identical to the individual that was the source of the transferred nucleus, hence the embryonic clone of the donor." Even the minority of the council that does not oppose research cloning agrees that SCNT amounts to human cloning.
When the bill came before the Senate Dec. 16, the vote was 25 to 0 -- all 20 Democrats and five Republicans voting aye, the remaining 15 Republicans abstaining. The five GOP supporters included Sen. Joseph Kyrillos, who doubles as state party chairman. Kyrillos was reported by colleagues to have said in a party caucus: "We can't vote against Christopher Reeve." ("I don't remember saying that," he told me.) Kyrillos is pro-choice, as is another of the Republican five, Sen. Bill Gormley, a failed 2000 candidate for the U.S. Senate.
In Trenton, other Republican supporters did not worry about conflict with their day jobs. Sen. Robert Singer, co-majority leader of the Senate, works for the Community-Kimball Medical Center. Richard Bagger was talked about for governor before he resigned from the Senate Jan. 15 to take a promotion at the Pfizer pharmaceutical firm, where he was already employed at the time of the cloning vote.
Beyond the distinctive mores of Trenton, pro-choice sentiments pervade the money raisers and contributors of the Republican Party. Kyrillos is a close associate of the militantly pro-choice Lewis Eisenberg of Rumson, N.J., who last week was re-elected national finance chairman of the Republican Party. Kyrillos and Eisenberg both serve on the Republican Leadership Council, which pursues the election of socially liberal Republicans.
New Jersey's prospective status as a haven for human cloning may be short-lived. Republican Sen. Sam Brownback of Kansas, principal sponsor of legislation to ban human cloning nationally, received assurances Tuesday from Majority Leader Bill Frist that the measure will be considered once it comes over from the House (something that did not happen in the Democratic-controlled Senate the last two years). That may well happen by early autumn -- not enough time for New Jersey to become the breeding center for a brave new world.
©2003 Creators Syndicate, Inc.
Injustice slips downhill while supposedly good humans do nothing.
I don't particularly blame mothers who plead for their sons who have committed murder. People who have been through horrendous things often don't think clearly. However, the people who aren't in his position have an obligation to think clearly. This discussion always reminds me of the argument in Steve Martin's movie, "The Man with Two Brains"
"But dozens of people are getting killed for your experiments!"
"If it saves one life, it will be worth it!"
BTW, before his accident, I thought he was a classic Hollywierd dork.
I agree as long as you don't define the scope of who should be killed for research too loosely. Be sure to allow enough leeway so that you yourself might qualify if divine wisdom permits it. Adult humans gots a whole lotta parts that might relieve someone else's suffering somewhere, somehow - or so a scientist guy told me. Name of Mengele.
I agree as long as you don't define the scope of who should be killed for research too loosely narrowly. Be sure to allow enough leeway so that you yourself might qualify if divine wisdom permits it. Adult humans got a whole lotta parts that might relieve someone else's suffering somewhere, somehow - or so a scientist guy told me. Name of Mengele.
Pardon my typo: "loosely" should be "narrowly." Maybe some murdered baby cells would help me focus.
Carry on.
Swift is good - he is the uber-curmudgeon of all time.
Therapeutic cloning sounds like an oxymoron to me too. As for those stating they would be victims if "therapeutic" cloning was not researched, it raises a sinister specter where the life and sanctuary of an embryo would not be worth the sanctuarless life of freaks who waste themselves doing tricks and then demand others to pay for their errors or accidents.
What is "therapeutic" cloning?
If if was growing skin on a dish from a skin cell, then fine, skin grafting is not a new thing. But if is to rape the truth participating sanctuaries of life and wombs so as to fix a bunch of reckless freaks who want their lives to be above that of truth, then it is completely illegal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.