Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bethlehem Steel Collapse Leaves Retired Workers Scrambling for Benefits (95,000 people)
Miami Herald ^ | Sun, Feb. 09, 2003 | DAVID B. CARUSO

Posted on 02/09/2003 4:00:38 PM PST by A Patriot Son

Bethlehem Steel collapse leaves retired workers scrambling for benefits

(AP) Sun, Feb. 09, 2003 BETHLEHEM, Pa. - Some of them went to work in the blast furnaces when they were just 18, then spent half a lifetime handling molten slag and inhaling steel dust in some of the most dangerous jobs on earth.

But for the tens of thousands of Bethlehem Steel workers who stuck it out, retirement brought a rich reward: a hefty pension and a lifetime of almost free health care for themselves and their families.

"It was capitalism's version of socialized medicine," said James Van Vliet, a retired Bethlehem Steel vice president. "And it was an implied contract. It was the company and the workers saying, 'We are going to take care of each other.'"

It may go down in history as a promise unfulfilled.

Bankrupt and only a shadow of its former might, Bethlehem Steel on Friday announced it was seeking bankruptcy court approval to terminate health and life insurance benefits for 95,000 retired workers and their dependents on March 31.

The move, seen as essential to the company's bid to sell its assets to International Steel Group, followed news in December that Bethlehem Steel's pension plan was underfunded by $3.2 billion and would be turned over to a government agency.

Both pieces of bad news were expected. The American steel industry has been in decline for decades, and most of its former giants have been trimming pensions and benefits for retirees for years.

But the one-two punch is still a staggering blow for a generation that had been promised a lifetime of comforts in return for a career spent at one company.

Now, some are facing the prospect of seeing their monthly $6 payments for health insurance jump to between $200 and $300.

"That's a lot to swallow," said Len Christman, 67, who worked 39 years at Bethlehem Steel's sprawling plant in Bethlehem, about 40 miles north of Philadelphia. "It's a very tough position to be in at this stage in life."

Nearly all retirees will continue to enjoy some benefits. Pension payments, which are being taken over by the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corp., are expected to continue at about 90 percent of their former level. For workers over 65, the federal Medicare program will pick up some health care costs.

But Medicare, which covers hospital visits, but doesn't pay for medications, won't come close to covering all the health problems suffered by many retired steel workers.

Joe Pancoe, who worked for Bethlehem Steel for 31 years, said that at 81, he has asthma and a hacking cough, and uses a slew of pills and inhalers to soothe his battered lungs.

"We, the old timers, were part of the industrial revolution. And now, we are part of the medical revolution. We have the emphysemas, we have the cancers. We have everything," he said.

He isn't positive his illnesses were related to his work as a spray painter in the plant's fabrication division, where he said his spit turned red from inhaling fumes, or in the research lab where he regularly handled bags of asbestos.

But as he sees it, the country owes him something either way. His labor built propellors for battleships and girders for skyscrapers and bridges.

"We helped the country, and the people who helped to build the country should get the benefit of it," Pancoe said.

Almost all workers agree Bethlehem Steel is in little position to help. When it filed for bankruptcy in 2001, the company had about 12,000 employees, down from more than 300,000 during World War II. And most factories have been closed, including the one in Bethlehem. The company's board also voted Saturday to sell the company's assets to Cleveland-based International Steel Group, a deal that is subject to approval by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New York.

Bruce Davis, a retired Bethlehem Steel lawyer who now serves as legal counsel for the Retired Employees Benefit Coalition, said several labor groups are negotiating to at least temporarily extend health-care benefits.

The coalition has asked that the company continue health benefits until May 31, rather than March. It also anticipates that it will be able to offer Bethlehem Steel retirees a replacement health insurance package similar to ones offered to retirees at other bankrupt steel companies.

The hardest burden, Davis said, will be borne by retired workers who are under 65, and thereby unable to qualify for Medicare coverage.

"We need to find a way to get them to age 65 without bankrupting their financial portfolio," Davis said. "If we can do that, the pain of seeing this proud company walk away from them, after so many years, will be considerably lessened."

---_

On the Net:

Bethlehem Steel: http://www.bethsteel.com


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Indiana; US: Maryland; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: bethlehemsteel; nafta; steel; wto
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-207 next last
To: Normally a Lurker
Just to clear up who will pay the future pension benefits, the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corp. if funded through employer paid insurance premiums.

From their website:
"PBGC is a federal corporation created under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. It currently guarantees payment of basic pension benefits earned by 44 million American workers and retirees participating in about 32,500 private-sector defined benefit pension plans. The agency receives no funds from general tax revenues. Operations are financed largely by insurance premiums paid by companies that sponsor pension plans and by PBGC's investment returns."

121 posted on 02/09/2003 6:23:33 PM PST by smalltown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: A Patriot Son
"Is it Socialism when the US government spend billions and builds modern steel plant in China, South Korea, Russia, Japan and Germany as it has?"

No.

Please consult a dictionary regarding the word, "socialism."

I can't believe, with all your brains, that you are that clueless about socialism.

122 posted on 02/09/2003 6:24:08 PM PST by MonroeDNA (dware ROCKS!!!! 101 mussels in one sitting, rasied over $2000 to keep the lights on at FR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: LasVegasMac
Be sure to read my posts #79 and 97.
123 posted on 02/09/2003 6:25:21 PM PST by A Patriot Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: A Patriot Son
"Yet you want the citizens and US taxpayers to get screwed..."

No, I want unions to get screwed, along with all other collectivists.

Longshoremen in LA are making $120,000 an hour, for pulling levers, unloading docks.

The rest of us pay the price.

124 posted on 02/09/2003 6:27:29 PM PST by MonroeDNA (dware ROCKS!!!! 101 mussels in one sitting, rasied over $2000 to keep the lights on at FR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: A Patriot Son
What everyone is saying Patriot Son is that it was a bet on the future that lost. Regardless of whether it is right or wrong doesn't matter. It's gone, done.

I've worked for lots of companies that promised something when "things turned around" or "got better" and it was part of my wages to be paid in the future. None of it ever panned out, so I took measures to take care of myself.

They sould count themselves lucky to be receiving 90% of their pensions, that too could be 0%.

I'm sorry it happened, but I don't want my money going to pay for something I had nothing to do with. I need it myself because I have to take care of myself.

125 posted on 02/09/2003 6:27:42 PM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: A Patriot Son
This is another case of the current union members screwing the retired members.

The benefit programs just got richer and richer while the industry got sicker and sicker. Heck, I've read that the current Union leadership ever supported this purchase (to once again save thier own short-term hide, at the expense of the retired).

I am somewhat familiar with the particulars of this case, and at the end of the day the health care/pension liabilities of Beth Steel were twice the current market cap of the company as a whole. That's called a death spiral. They could have not sold and just shut the whole place down, but then what good would have that done?
126 posted on 02/09/2003 6:28:05 PM PST by Daus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MonroeDNA
I repeat: (2)Do you aprove of this International Socialism at American citizens' expense?(Giving billions of dollars to Russia, China, S Korea, Japan, and Germany to build steel palnts.)

And..Do you know what International Socialism is?

127 posted on 02/09/2003 6:29:43 PM PST by A Patriot Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: A Patriot Son
Let me re-phrase that:

I WANT THE UNIONS TO GET SCREWED!!!!! ALONG WITH ALL SOCIALISTIC COLLECTIVISTS!!!

Sorry if that wasn't clear the first time.

128 posted on 02/09/2003 6:29:52 PM PST by MonroeDNA (dware ROCKS!!!! 101 mussels in one sitting, rasied over $2000 to keep the lights on at FR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Daus
Please read my replies # 79 mand 97 for the root of the problems.
129 posted on 02/09/2003 6:31:22 PM PST by A Patriot Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: MonroeDNA
Do you approve of the United States government financing at US citizen expense of billions and supplying the technology to build the modern steel plants Russia, China, Germany, Japan and South Korea?
130 posted on 02/09/2003 6:34:37 PM PST by A Patriot Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: saminfl
I've seen it. I worked in the same position for 26.5 years. For the last ten we were basicly told every three months that we might lose our jobs any minute. I was damned good at what I did. Industry people from all over southern California told me I was in the top two or three at what I did. Finally I took a promotion that I knew would go nowhere, spent two years there and was laid off.

In my career I spent close to $70 million dollars and ran a 98.5% plus compliance compared to industry norms of 85 to 95%.

This is the business environment in which we live today. The best long term employees are harassed to the point they leave, their positions given to someone who'll do the job for two or three dollars less per hour. The funny thing is, management never seems to understand that kaos and sub-par performance are going to go along with the process. That' isn't a put down to the person who replaces. It's just that you can't obtain 26.5 years worth of experience in thirty days.

In the last two years at my primary job, I witnessed about 66% of long term staff forced out. This concern lost thousands of years worth of savey and competence, and never batted an eyelash.

131 posted on 02/09/2003 6:34:45 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Freeper Caribbean Cruise May 31-June 6, Staterooms As Low As $610 Per Person For Entire Week!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: A Patriot Son
The compny knew of the legally binding contracts when they agreed the company.

They are being bought out of bankruptcy. To make this possible, the court voids contracts that make the company unsellable to outside investors. Come to grips with the basic facts of the case; the court is trying to save what is left of the company. Contracts are no longer legally binding when a company goes through a bankruptcy. Many of the contracts that the court doesn't void outright are renegotiated between various parties until suitable terms are reached that will allow the company to continue.

In the end, everyone is left holding at least part of the bag, including customers, employees, and investors. Secured debt is only partially recovered and unsecured debt (e.g. retirement healthcare in this case) is usually a write-off. It isn't just the retirees that are getting screwed in this case, just about everyone involved with the company is, and the former employees do better than most because of various socialist programs the feds put in place as a safety net. One could argue that the businesses holding unsecured debt have far more to complain about than retirees losing healthcare benefits. Get some perspective.

132 posted on 02/09/2003 6:38:00 PM PST by tortoise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: A Patriot Son
"I repeat: (2)Do you aprove of this International Socialism at American citizens' expense?(Giving billions of dollars to Russia, China, S Korea, Japan, and Germany to build steel palnts.)"

I reject your premise that free enterprise, going to the cheapest labor (Free trade) is socialist. Your definitions are completely off, so far off, that I question your true motives. From the Encarta dictionary:

so·cial·ism [ ssh lìzm ] noun 1. political system of communal ownership: a political theory or system in which the means of production and distribution are controlled by the people and operated according to equity and fairness rather than market principles

2. movement based on socialism: any of several political movements or theories of the 19th and 20th centuries based on principles of socialism, typically advocating an end to private property and the exploitation of workers

3. stage between capitalism and communism: in Marxist theory, the stage after the proletarian revolution when a society is changing from capitalism to communism, marked by pay distributed according to work done rather than need

Sounds like unions to me.

"And..Do you know what International Socialism is?"

France? Germany? Steel unions? Kyoto treaty? Tarrifs? Pat Buchannon?

133 posted on 02/09/2003 6:38:20 PM PST by MonroeDNA (dware ROCKS!!!! 101 mussels in one sitting, rasied over $2000 to keep the lights on at FR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: codercpc
I hope you understand that your husband's company, with a 15 day notice, can terminate and/or change anything in their benefit package.
134 posted on 02/09/2003 6:38:45 PM PST by Hardcorps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: A Patriot Son
Do you believe the Steel industry would have remained vibrant if these handouts had not been made?

Industries such as these have no future in this country if what it requires (largely back-breaking labor) is available elsewhere cheaper and non-unionized.
135 posted on 02/09/2003 6:39:13 PM PST by Daus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Daus
Exactly. We're not going to pay somebody $35 an hour to dip ladels, or screw bumpers on cars. We'll buy cheaper steel elsewhere, or foreign cars. Don't ask us to subsidize overpaid labor.

136 posted on 02/09/2003 6:42:45 PM PST by MonroeDNA (dware ROCKS!!!! 101 mussels in one sitting, rasied over $2000 to keep the lights on at FR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: A Patriot Son
hello? Did you say something about socialism?

Want to argue with Encarta?
137 posted on 02/09/2003 6:45:07 PM PST by MonroeDNA (dware ROCKS!!!! 101 mussels in one sitting, rasied over $2000 to keep the lights on at FR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: A Patriot Son
From Webster:

Main Entry: so·cial·ism
Pronunciation: 'sO-sh&-"li-z&m
Function: noun
Date: 1837
1 : any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state
3 : a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done
138 posted on 02/09/2003 6:49:55 PM PST by MonroeDNA (dware ROCKS!!!! 101 mussels in one sitting, rasied over $2000 to keep the lights on at FR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Daus
Do you believe the Steel industry would have remained vibrant if these handouts had not been made?

Yes Absolutely, Yes!

They are still around--even as the skeletons they are so certainly they'd be vibrant without the all-out US government financed attack against them.
(And can you even imagine the modern factories they'd have with the billions of profits they'd have earned without the artificial competition the US government built against them?)

We(the US government) built the competition and continue to in this quest for globalization/world government/International Socialism or whatever you wish to call it.

139 posted on 02/09/2003 6:49:59 PM PST by A Patriot Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: A Patriot Son
Welcome, newbie, member of 13 days.
140 posted on 02/09/2003 6:52:27 PM PST by MonroeDNA (dware ROCKS!!!! 101 mussels in one sitting, rasied over $2000 to keep the lights on at FR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-207 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson