Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Israeli expert implicates Iraq in US anthrax attacks
Jerusalem Post ^ | Feb. 11, 2003 | DAVID RUDGE

Posted on 02/11/2003 7:37:08 AM PST by yonif

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: Route66
If it were publicly known that Iraq was behind the anthrax, would France, Germany, and Russia be able to oppose going to war against Saddam?
41 posted on 02/11/2003 12:06:24 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Route66
I totally agree with you. Excellent thoughts!
42 posted on 02/11/2003 12:27:52 PM PST by judicial meanz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan; Nita Nuprez; Wolfstar
"A comprehensive analysis of all the relevant information negates the still considered possibility that the operation was a purely American domestic affair," he said.

I'll bet Hatfill is happy to hear this. < /sarcasm>

43 posted on 02/11/2003 1:55:51 PM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
'If it were publicly known that Iraq was behind the anthrax, would France, Germany, and Russia be able to oppose going to war against Saddam?'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In my opinion - yes.
They would do it in exactly the same way they have done it with all the other compelling evidence and justification that we have already provided. No amount of evidence will be enough [as they have already made it clear Saddam is more trustworthy than we are].

The truth is these nations have a clear personal agenda in their opposition of our engagement of Iraq under any circumstances - [short of perhaps actual forced invasion of their own countries by Saddam]. There is obviously a very high stakes game being played involving obstructing US plans for removing Saddam and helping to facilitate a democratic form of government in Iraq. These nations seem to have decided to go for broke.

44 posted on 02/11/2003 1:58:23 PM PST by Route66 (America's Mainstreet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Kryptonite
1) Because the primary objective of the anthrax mailings was terror, not murder. (2)Because they liked the way Klintoon pinned OKC wholly on McVeigh so much that they thought they could accomplish their terror objective while also getting cover from a "right wing extremist" theory, and that cover is exactly what they got from the start. 3 posted on 02/11/2003 7:57 AM PST by Kryptonite

Makes sense to me!

45 posted on 02/11/2003 2:01:31 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: John H K; All
"...and REALLY go out of your way to kill as FEW people as possible with the anthrax..."

Why do you assume the perpetrators of the anthrax attacks INTENDED to kill few people with it? The most likely reason is a miscalculation. The perps wanted to bring down American government, military, financial institutions, and media all in one fell swoope. The fact that the first known letter went to an outfit called American Media is telling. Other letters went to Brokaw and Rather, two famous U.S. media personalities. One may have also gone to Jennings, since a child who visited ABC got sick. But the source was never determined.

As for Daschle and Leahy, to anyone unfamiliar with our system of government, in the months prior to 9/11 Daschle would have seemed like the guy in charge of the whole Congress. Leahy was also all over the tube during that time being interviewed about judicial appointments. So he could easily have seemed more important than he was (or is).

The hijackings were intended to take out easily identifiable financial, military and government targets. The flight that came down in Pennsylvania is believed to have been intended for the White House or the Capitol. It is also believed that other hijackers were in the air that day, but didn't act before air traffic was shut down nationwide.

There are no easily identifiable ABC-CBS-NBC targets that could be taken out from the air. But the anthrax could do it (or so the perps thought). Plus, it had the added benefit of serving as a backup operation if any one hijacking attempt didn't go according to plan.

Although they did succeed in slaughtering over 3000 people, shutting down our air traffic, government, and financial institutions, and rocking the country back on its heels for a short while, luck actually wasn't entirely with them. The twin towers and Pentagon attrocities killed far fewer people than what might have been the case a little later in the day, or if the towers came down faster, or, in the case of the Pentagon plane, if it had hit more squarely into the heart of the building. The Pennsylvania plane did not hit its intended target. And the anthrax attacks sowed lots of fear, but killed few.

46 posted on 02/11/2003 2:51:26 PM PST by Wolfstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: martianagent
"That one doesn't take a whole lot of brains..."

Well, actually, it seems to take more brains than most on the Left appear to have.

47 posted on 02/11/2003 2:54:32 PM PST by Wolfstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Yes. No evidence would be conclusive enough for them. The French, Germans and, to a possibly lesser degree, the Russians, are up to their eyeballs in trade with Saddam (both legitimate and illegitimate).
48 posted on 02/11/2003 3:04:52 PM PST by Wolfstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
If it were publicly known that Iraq was behind the anthrax, would France, Germany, and Russia be able to oppose going to war against Saddam?

Seems to me the other way round. If they know Saddam is behind the anthrax, why would they want to join America in a war against Saddam? That would be like sticking little targets to their heads: "Hit me, I need to take millions dead!"

49 posted on 02/11/2003 4:07:18 PM PST by The Great Satan (Revenge, Terror and Extortion: A Guide for the Perplexed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Kryptonite
that they thought they could accomplish their terror objective while also getting cover from a "right wing extremist" theory

Then it wasn't terror. It was an attempt to decive us into thinking the right wing did something...that's not terror.
50 posted on 02/11/2003 4:12:44 PM PST by Vinomori
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
Point well made.

But I still believe there is a chance that the mailings to Daschle and Leahy were studied. The instructions the terrorists received may well have been "(to get attention) attack the American media, along with the Democrats (to deflect the attention from us)".

Of course, there would be some poetic justice in Daschle's getting a packet just because the media gave him a lot of face time...and he came across as an a**hole.

51 posted on 02/11/2003 5:54:09 PM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: okie01
See this thread, post #25

Anthrax - Al Qaeda theory - commentary to date in support
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/798048/posts#25

The reason Daschle and Leahy were targeted was because of their positions and control of certain appropriations.

52 posted on 02/12/2003 3:13:18 AM PST by Lion's Cub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Allan
Ping
53 posted on 02/12/2003 5:41:52 AM PST by Nogbad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: judicial meanz
It originated in Ames, but it is everywhere in the world.

This is extremely misleading.
The virulent Ames was modified to make it non-pathogenic.
It is this non-virulent Ames which has been distributed fairly widely.
The virulent Ames is known to exist in perhaps fewer than 6 labs.
Certainly not everywhere in the world.

54 posted on 02/12/2003 6:09:36 AM PST by Allan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: okie01
ping to #54.
55 posted on 02/12/2003 6:17:39 AM PST by Allan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Allan
You are right. I got corrected on this point already. Thanks for setting me straight.
56 posted on 02/12/2003 6:26:48 AM PST by judicial meanz (< socialism- its a mental disorder, not a political party!>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson