Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US to punish German 'treachery'
The Observer (U.K.) ^ | 02/16/03 | Peter Beaumont, David Rose and Paul Beaver

Posted on 02/15/2003 4:00:02 PM PST by Pokey78

America is to punish Germany for leading international opposition to a war against Iraq. The US will withdraw all its troops and bases from there and end military and industrial co-operation between the two countries - moves that could cost the Germans billions of euros.

The plan - discussed by Pentagon officials and military chiefs last week on the orders of Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld - is designed 'to harm' the German economy to make an example of the country for what US hawks see as Chancellor Gerhard Schröder's 'treachery'.

The hawks believe that making an example of Germany will force other countries heavily dependent on US trade to think twice about standing up to America in future.

This follows weeks of increasingly angry exchanges between Rumsfeld and Germany, in which at one point he taunted Germany and France for being an irrelevant part of 'old Europe'.

Now Rumsfeld has decided to go further by unilaterally imposing the Pentagon's sanctions on a country already in the throes of economic problems.

'We are doing this for one reason only: to harm the German economy,' one source told The Observer last week.

'Our troops contribute many millions of dollars. Why should we continue to support a country which has treated Nato and the protection we provided for decades with such incredible contempt?'

Another Pentagon source said: 'The aim is to hit German trade and commerce. It is not just about taking out the troops and equipment; it is also about cancelling commercial contracts and defence-related arrangements.'

The Pentagon plan - and the language expressed by officials close to Rumsfeld - has horrified State Department officials, who believe that bullying other countries to follow the US line will further exacerbate anti-Americanism and alienate those European countries that might support a United Nations resolution authorising a war.

German industry earns billions of euros every year from supporting the US Army Europe which, although reduced from its Cold War heights, still totals 42,000 troops and 785 tanks - almost three times as many as the British Army owns. Many of these soldiers and their fighting equipment, including Apache helicopters, have already been sent to the Gulf.

German industry is heavily involved in supporting the US presence. Among the defence companies which stand to lose out are missile-maker Diehl, aerospace and defence giant EADS Deutschland, armaments maker Rheinmetall and vehicle maker Krauss-Maffei Wegmann.

There is also a US Air Force contingent of about 15,000 service people with bases at Bitburg, Frankfurt-am-Main and neighbouring Ramstein, where the commander doubles as part of the Nato command. This force includes nearly 60 F-16 fighter-bombers and a squadron of A-10 tank-buster aircraft.

Rumsfeld and his staff have made no attempt to hide their fury at Schröder's 'treachery and ineptitude' over Iraq. Last week Schröder leaked to reporters a Franco-German plan for avoiding war by increasing the number of UN weapons inspectors before informing his American counterparts.

'After this, Germany is finished as a serious power,' one of the sources added. 'This is simply not the way to conduct diplomacy at a moment of international crisis.' One diplomatic source said Rumsfeld was 'furious at Germany. He is a bruiser and it looks as though he means to do it'.

Under these plans, the US would move its troops in Europe eastwards to countries such as Poland, the Czech Republic and the Baltic states, all of which have strongly supported America's line against Saddam Hussein. It is likely that the overall size of the deployment would be reduced, as the US military changes its priorities for a long-term and disparate engagement with international terrorism.

Although Rumsfeld had already been considering a redeployment of US troops around the world after a war in Iraq to save money and respond to new threats, the plans now under consideration go far beyond what had been discussed.

It is likely that future years will see a sharp increase in the proportion of special forces troops able to deploy rapidly across the globe.

Germany would suffer considerable financial loss if US forces were withdrawn from the country. The bases provide jobs for local people as everything from administrators to cleaners, and are huge customers for dairy products and bread.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Germany; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-190 next last
To: Zeroisanumber
Yes, we disagree, but kicking the legs out from under an ally's economy in a fit of pique is idiotic

Please explain one thing, what are the Germans and French doing to help our economy? It's certainly not necessary for us to help all economies, so why not help our friends in Poland and the Czech Republic instead?

61 posted on 02/15/2003 4:41:41 PM PST by bfree (Liberals are EVIL!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
Ditto, I just love the way he handles the press too.
62 posted on 02/15/2003 4:42:19 PM PST by KY Dittohead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LibservitiveRepublicrat
Everyone on this site is always so angry and one way.
Everyone can't be our enemy !

we're not always angry...just look at the posts from the Nov. 2002 election night celebrations!

......also, everyone is not our enemy, just Saddam, Hillary Clinton, France, North Korea, Ted Kennedy, Dasshole, Iran and bin Laden

63 posted on 02/15/2003 4:43:41 PM PST by rface (Ashland, Missouri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
Agree on the tightening and on the relocation.

I don't think we should bring them completely home.
We should probably look to relocating some of those bases closer to hotspots where we can help project our strength.

If we go too far East, we would have to worry about air rights for operations. Too spread out and we then can't project an appreciable amount of force. They also should be in countries that are not completely Islamic. We would be too easy a target then.
64 posted on 02/15/2003 4:44:55 PM PST by sl-17b (Piss off a liberal by using your brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: jpthomas
You can get REAL Budweiser in the U.S. now. They call it "Czechvar" from Budvar. Best beer in the world. I've had it tapped from an oak keg. Pure heaven.
65 posted on 02/15/2003 4:46:01 PM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA
He wants a rail line that will take our troops and armor to Italy without interuption. There is only one viable rail route to get to Italy without passing through neutral Switzerland or Austria or hostile France. You would have to go from Hungary through Croatia (a German puppet) to Slovenia to Trieste. The other rail alternative looks like Hungary, Bulgaria, Greece.
66 posted on 02/15/2003 4:47:05 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: *war_list
OFFICIAL BUMP(TOPIC)LIST
67 posted on 02/15/2003 4:50:27 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Nuke Saddam ( Bush is thinking about it ) and then what about Germany and France?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailback
Czech beer is better.
68 posted on 02/15/2003 4:50:52 PM PST by katana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: eno_
Right...Right.

I guess I could have used a btter term than 'throw them to the wolves'.

But my point is that today's flap with the current German admin. need not lead to isolating them.

Diplomacy is just another way of saying: Ok, you pis*ed me of today, but let's see what tomorrow brings.

It wasn't too far back when the Shah of Iran (and his kin) was our good ol' boy buddy.


69 posted on 02/15/2003 4:51:36 PM PST by JimVT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: LibservitiveRepublicrat
Everyone on this site is always so angry and one way.

Some of us are irate.

Does everyone just go along with what they are told to think?

Yes, of course. We have implants that download Rush Limbaugh directly to our brains on a special frequency which directs us 24/7.

I've experienced the us or them of combat but don't believe we can always act like war time.

Geee wizz, I never thought of that. I wonder is anyone else here has. Maybe you should work real hard at informing folks here, I'm sure they never considered these thoughts before.

Everyone can't be our enemy !

Except for Liberals and folks who want us dead. All the rest are only the enemy when they help liberals and folks who want us dead.

70 posted on 02/15/2003 4:54:14 PM PST by VRWC_minion ( Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Strange that a Marine becomes the commander and everyone is worried about toeing the line.

All the armed forces are now following the USMC pattern of quick strike, rapid deployment, fluent operations.

I believe I saw one of the incentives was from a USAF Col.
71 posted on 02/15/2003 4:56:57 PM PST by opbuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
My Wife said today that her and her family [ 2nd generation germans] has lived with the stigma of being germans.Most people had starting to accept.Then along comes a D#ck head like gerhardt shitt#r and it all starts all over again.
72 posted on 02/15/2003 4:57:25 PM PST by solo gringo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tessalu

I hope we don't overreact to the antics of the current Government in Germany. In many ways the Schroeder government is an electoral anomaly that will probably soon be out of power. I advocate that we wait and see what the new CDU government does before acting rashly.

73 posted on 02/15/2003 4:58:32 PM PST by ggekko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Great idea, but where will the troops go to?

Iraq ....
for 100 years Europe was the problem child of the civilized world. They have passed that baton onto the Middle East.

74 posted on 02/15/2003 5:06:00 PM PST by Centurion2000 (Chance favors the prepared mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: It's me
Love that Urquel beer.
75 posted on 02/15/2003 5:08:02 PM PST by mathurine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
German industry earns billions of euros every year from supporting the US Army Europe which, although reduced from its Cold War heights, still totals 42,000 troops and 785 tanks - almost three times as many as the British Army owns.

My brother spent many years in Germany, as an auditor for the Defense Department. For many of those years he worked at a tank depot which was contracted to Germans - completely. They repaired and re-built American tanks.

I don't know if it still exists but it provided high paying jobs to a lot of Germans. Hundreds of them. Why shouldn't we move that kind of facility to a more friendly country, such as Poland?

76 posted on 02/15/2003 5:08:09 PM PST by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sl-17b
While I think a part of this article is true, I think this is just propoganda for those that are trying to portray America as selfish and spiteful.

Absolutely. This is nothing more than an attempt to play to the anti-American peace pukes in Europe, to whip them into even greater anti-American fury. What I would ask this little troll is, "Since when is it the job of the US military to subsidize your failed socialistic economy?"

He's trying to have it both ways, just like so many more of these deluded, America-hating leftists sitting in their little cubicles spewing out bile like this. Maybe they should just come right out and ask us to pull out our troops and then send them checks -at least this would be honest. But I forget, the word "honest" doesn't exist in the new state-approved EU dictionary.

77 posted on 02/15/2003 5:08:23 PM PST by CFC__VRWC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: jpthomas
I've had Czech Budweiser before, in fact I wouldn't be surprised if it wasn't specifically marketed for all the GI's in Germany. I remember the NCO club at Rhein Main Airbase sold it. It was probably the first legal beer I ever bought since I was 18 at the time and was processing through the 21st replacement detachment on my way to Turkey.
78 posted on 02/15/2003 5:09:01 PM PST by Tailback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: sl-17b
See Chris' post #60.

Some, but not all, will be brought home. Others will be spread around in various places around Europe. It's time to downscale in Europe. I can see keeping a few bases in Europe (I'm thinking the Army hospital to which are troops are brought after being injured in Afghanistan, for one), but it's not necessary to keep them centered in Germany.

79 posted on 02/15/2003 5:11:42 PM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
Not Greece, we tried that one before.
80 posted on 02/15/2003 5:11:45 PM PST by americanbychoice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-190 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson