Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: Support for Iraq War Still Strong
foxnews ^ | February 21, 2003

Posted on 02/21/2003 3:27:15 PM PST by Indy Pendance

Edited on 04/22/2004 12:35:34 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

WASHINGTON

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cfr; conspiracy; publicopinion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: cake_crumb
It's surprising how few FReepers even know the extent of the coalition of the willing.

I think if Bush started the liberation of Iraq tonight America would still be behind him.
This poll asks a few questons that are minor in the bigger sceme of things. If the question was "Should Bush start the liberation of Iraq now?" The answer would be a "Well, sure." And he rest wouldn't really matter that much.

21 posted on 02/21/2003 5:38:26 PM PST by concerned about politics (Stop Taxpayer Supported Socialist Indoctrinatin... Support School Choice ..Demand it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: SamAdams76
Same here. I wonder how many of those peaceniks came down from Canada? Or how many belong to the envirowackos who stormed Seattle?
23 posted on 02/21/2003 5:52:04 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
Reagan was vilified by the media, and the europeons protested him unmercifully. He didn't listen to them then. Liberals absolutely hate conservativism and will ignore any good policy if it is presented by conservatives.
24 posted on 02/21/2003 5:55:34 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
"If the question was 'Should Bush start the liberation of Iraq now?' The answer would be a 'Well, sure.' And he rest wouldn't really matter that much."

That's a darned good point. They sure wouldn't ask such a question now, when the public is aware of Saddam's illegal missiles.

25 posted on 02/21/2003 5:57:27 PM PST by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = VERY expensive, very SCRATCHY toilet paper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: seamole
All excellent questions. Just having them asked would unstick a lot of stuck mental gears.
26 posted on 02/21/2003 6:22:21 PM PST by MattAMiller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: seamole
bravo!!
bravo!!
27 posted on 02/21/2003 6:29:43 PM PST by USMC_tangocharlie (Victory belongs to the man who wants it the most, and believes in it the longest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Attila Flagellum Dei
Which ones of these countries does not depend on US aid ?

Hmmmm... a fair question.

But an objective questioner would also ask, which of the nay-saying coutries -- France, Germany, Belgium, Russia and China -- doesn't do business with Iraq.

Your above post is not objective.

28 posted on 02/21/2003 6:43:57 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
I don't think it's "pollaganda" so much as it is an illustration of the limitations of using public perceptions to determine policy.

It sounds like you automatically trust that this poll was done fairly. Who paid for this PEW poll? What does it mean, that this poll "was carried out with the Council on Foreign Relations"?.

29 posted on 02/21/2003 6:49:58 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
February 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Baghdad
 SunSet
 SunRise
   

   

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

22   14%
 +7.3hrs

  6:53pm
  7:38am
23   11%
 +8.4hrs

24   10%
 +9.2hrs

25   9%
 +10.2hrs

26   8%
 +11.2hrs

27   6%
 +11.8hrs

28   4%
 All Night

01   2%
 All Night

  6:59pm
  7:30am
March 2003
02   0%
 All Night

03   0%
 All Night

04   2%
 -11.2hrs

05   4%
 -10.2hrs

06   6%
 -9.3hrs

07   8%
 -8.4hrs

08   9%
 -7.4hrs

  7:04pm
  7:22am
09   9%
 -6.4hrs

10  10%
 -5.4hrs

11  12%
 -4.5hrs

12  15%
 -3.5hrs

13   20%
 -2.6hrs

14   26%
 -1.8hrs

15   34%
 -1.0hrs

  7:04pm
  7:22am
16  44%
 n/a

17  55%
 n/a

18  100%
 n/a

   
 

   
 

   
 

   
 

  7:04pm
  7:22am
Legend:
      (%)Luminance compared to Full Moon
        (Starlight alone is 1/2 of 1% of a Full Moon)

Nighttime TOTAL BLACKOUT period
      ( + ) hours AFTER sunset when Moon is behind the Earth, OR
      ( - ) hours BEFORE sunRISE when Moon behind the Earth

(Times not adjusted for 25 minutes of civil twilight after sunset or before dawn)
(Luminance figures are approximate based on an average lunar cycle. Figures
are even less when the moon is lower in the sky ... and crescent moons don't get
very high in the sky until after daybreak)
.



Detailed Local Forecast For Baghdad, Iraq
Tonight: Partly cloudy skies. Low 48F. Winds SSW at 5 to 10 mph.
Tomorrow: Partly cloudy. High 62F. Winds WNW at 10 to 20 mph.
Tomorrow night: Clear to partly cloudy skies. Low 41F. Winds NE at 5 to 10 mph.
Sunday: Partly cloudy. Highs in the mid 60s and lows in the upper 30s.
Monday: Light rain likely. Highs in the upper 40s and lows in the upper 20s.
Tuesday: Partial sunshine. Highs in the upper 40s and lows in the mid 20s.
Wednesday: Mix of sun and clouds. Highs in the low 50s and lows in the mid 20s.
Thursday: Mix of sun and clouds. Highs in the mid 50s and lows in the upper 20s.
Friday: Partly cloudy. Highs in the upper 50s and lows in the upper 20s.
Saturday: Partial sunshine. Highs in the upper 50s and lows in the upper 20s.
Sunday: Partly cloudy. Highs in the low 60s and lows in the low 30s.
Click Weather.Com for updates
Last Updated Friday, February 21, at 8:05 PM Local Time (Friday 9:05 AM EST)


30 posted on 02/21/2003 6:53:37 PM PST by Future Useless Eater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
See what ya get for writing before you read?
31 posted on 02/21/2003 7:01:23 PM PST by Nick Danger (Freeps Ahoy! Caribbean cruise May 31... from $610 http://www.freeper.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
It's ALL about OIL!!!
32 posted on 02/21/2003 7:12:28 PM PST by sam_paine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
Check this out.

France, Germany protect Iraq ties

33 posted on 02/21/2003 7:16:36 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Amazing to think the polls are still in favor of this considering all of the news I hear says just the opposite. If I didn't know better, I'd think there was a propaganda campaign going against the President, but of course that can't be, the news is not biased afterall. (sarcasm, of course)

34 posted on 02/21/2003 7:19:39 PM PST by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
There are alternative sources of media nowdays. Look at us! People are waking up. ABC and all are not the big boys anymore. Fox is cleaning up with news on television. Rush is the number radio personality in the country. The liberals have finally lost their monolopy, and it shows. Look at how desperate they are. They do not have a vision. They are still in the blame game.

Actions speak louder than words.

35 posted on 02/21/2003 7:26:23 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
"poll of 1,254 adults"

Screw PEW

36 posted on 02/21/2003 7:28:56 PM PST by BobS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
I am thrilled that they are desperate! You are right, it shows with all of their hysterical spewing out of the media these days. Rush was right, they are funny when they are out of power! Liberal talk radio has never been successful, and I doubt if it ever will be.
37 posted on 02/21/2003 7:53:11 PM PST by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
"drop in percent polls when people are asked about attacking without allied backing"

This "drop" in support is directly related to the press (and demacRAT party's) latest attempt to perpetrate another lie on the American people. Namely, that we are considering "going it alone" into Iraq, or how about "the American people don't want to go it alone" . How many times have you heard these words used by the press? It's a lie. How much coverage was given to the letter in the Wall Street Journal signed by all the countries who are with us? Answer: Not much. The press mentioned the letter breifly, but they have continued to use the "go it alone " and "unilateral " terms in their reports on public support.

The question in the poll is false. It asked weather we should go WITH OUT ALLIES and of course many of the American people said no. THE QUESTION GIVES THE FALSE IMPRESSION THAT WE HAVE NO ALLIES. Then it aks about another UN resolution, wich people assume is about gaining allies. What our people are confused about, is weather we have allies or not.

If I were President Bush and his staff , I would make a concerted effort to explain to the American people that WE HAVE ALLIES WITH OR WITHOUT THE UN. For example: any time a reporter tries to use the term "go it alone" (or some term like this) President Bush should stop him and repeat the names of the countries that are with us . He could send his staff members out to the mainstream press outlets and cable and read have them read the WSJ letter again or he could just say, "the press is trying to give the impression we don't have allies; this is not true. We have (repeat the entire list of countries who have pleged their support)" at various press conferences and public appearences, until people get it. Everyone on his staff should have the names of the countries that support us memorized so they can immediately respond when the press tries the "going it alone " impression. It should be made clear that the UN is representative of the "axis of weasles". Our people should be reminded of things like the UN has Syria in charge of Human Rights (and that Syria has HUGE Human rights violations) while we were kicked off the commission, and that they are planning on putting Iraq in charge of disarming itself. But it is most important to clear up the confusion between who our allies are(that we have them), and UN support,make it clear these are 2 different things.

38 posted on 02/21/2003 8:00:26 PM PST by fly_so_free (demacrat /socialist /communist/traitor=same thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seamole
That's my kind of poll!!!

also how about:

"Do you think ex-Presidents or the current President should direct our foreign policy?"

"Do you Saddam Hussein draws comfort from protests opposing a war against the Iraqi regime?"
39 posted on 02/21/2003 8:39:09 PM PST by WOSG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Attila Flagellum Dei
Most of eastern Europe and certainly the UK, Spain, Italy, Japan and a host of others do NOT get US foreign aid. YEt they are with us.

OTOH, *unhelpful* countries that we *do* fund like Pakistan, Mexico, Egypt, and several African nations are aligning with the Axis of Weasels.

And I heard on news today we are continuing food aid to NORTH KOREA. Oh joy.

Go figure!
40 posted on 02/21/2003 8:43:30 PM PST by WOSG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson