Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Microsoft eases switch to XP
zdnet.com. ^ | February 25, 2003

Posted on 02/25/2003 8:13:03 AM PST by MeekOneGOP

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-173 next last
To: ShadowAce
Just yesterday we received a 'virtual memory minimun to low' error for the first time. I increased the memory paging file to no avail. Rebooting regularly has not helped though. The computer is eight months old with 1.3GHz / 60GB / 128MB. Thanks!
21 posted on 02/25/2003 8:43:55 AM PST by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
Speaking of memory leaks, is there software to diagnose this pesky and common irritation?

Unfortunately, none that I am aware of.

Sounds like a great OSS project to start for someone who knows what they are going... :)

22 posted on 02/25/2003 8:44:51 AM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: billorites
and my wife's wierd obsession with WordStar.

ROTFL

I'M NOT ALONE! As long as you and your wife are around I don't feel isolated!

My wife is a First Choice junkie! The version that was written in 1985! I have to keep a 2 gig partition on her machine so that she can still run DOS!
23 posted on 02/25/2003 8:45:23 AM PST by PatriotGames (AOOHGA! AOOHGA! CLEAR THE BRIDGE! DIVE! DIVE! WHOOSH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
This tool came out BEFORE XP was released.
It is, however, far from reliable.
XP is no great shakes. For all of the headaches and aggravation, I'm just going to get a Mac for the wife and digital production, keep the 98 for games and move any server tasks to Linux.
If I wanted to do it all on once machine, I'd be caught between Linux and Mac, since I really don't care for MicroSoft teaming up with Hollywood to decide whether I should be allowed to have on my machine what I have on my machine.
Maybe if they could get MS Money to work properly on Windows, I'd feel differently. Barring that...
24 posted on 02/25/2003 8:45:28 AM PST by dyed_in_the_wool (I am Jack's smirking revenge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
going==doing
25 posted on 02/25/2003 8:46:00 AM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: chachacha
Had the same problem with MS Money.
Took them 2 hours to diagnose and they had the error in the wrong OS section.
Sure, you can trust them.
26 posted on 02/25/2003 8:46:36 AM PST by dyed_in_the_wool (I am Jack's smirking revenge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
Probably need to re-install the whole thing, including the OS. I think the technical name for the problem is rot. It usually manifests itself in the behavior you report. Usually due to the program or OS getting corrupted and leaving behind a bad memory leak or some other problem. Sometimes Norton system doctor can fix it, sometimes not.

Run norton, if it doesn't fix it, rebuild the whole system with a blank hd. What I often do is just replace the disk with a fresh one and re-build. Then the original disk is there in case more problems arise. Especially if it is some serious program being used, like you have. Safest way to go.

Not a joke, BTW.

snooker.
27 posted on 02/25/2003 8:47:03 AM PST by snooker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Shouldn't have gotten a Dell, Dude. When you buy a computer with a pre-installed operationg system, you're geting a crippled OSAnyone who can spare a couple of extra bucks should get their machine custom built locally by someone who's been doing it for a while, and someone who can help with glitches.

Yeah, the worst part of the story is that my brother owns a computer store, and has been custom building them for years. He was busy and I did not want to bother him!

I'm an @ssh@le. I stand publicly revealed.

(Kicking self, over and over...)

28 posted on 02/25/2003 8:50:17 AM PST by Gorzaloon (Contents may have settled during shipping, but this tagline contains the stated product weight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: snooker
Sounds like sensible advice.
29 posted on 02/25/2003 8:50:23 AM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Billy_bob_bob; snooker
Reformat the hard drive - I'm afraid I'm familiar with the process. I can easily copy critical date via the network and then reinstall OS and engineering software. But it's really a shame this operation has to be performed on such a 'young' computer. Sheesh, I hate this stuff.

Many, many thanks.
30 posted on 02/25/2003 8:51:58 AM PST by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
It has been my experience that when you run heavy duty software on a PC (CAD-CAM, Photoshop, etc.) you can pretty much expect to have to re-format the hard drive every six months or so. As you say, the system is "young", but the drive has many many hard miles on it and the "rot" has built up. Give it a good scrubbing with a formatting and it should be good as new.
31 posted on 02/25/2003 8:58:10 AM PST by Billy_bob_bob ("He who will not reason is a bigot;He who cannot is a fool;He who dares not is a slave." W. Drummond)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
as each day goes by, the performance gets slower and slower.

I've seen that in a Gateway PC. It was fixed by reformatting and reinstalling the OS. I don't know what causes it but I have a theory based on experience with my sister's PC. It could be "soft" errors on the hard drive, causing multiple retries. the data is eventually read correctly, but performance tanks. You could get the disk manufacturer's repair program, which re-does the low-level format and maps out the bad spots, but in a professional setting, I'd replace the drive.

32 posted on 02/25/2003 8:58:26 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Gorzaloon
By the way (lawyere feel free to chime in) I think it is perfectly legal and ethical to pay for XP and install Win 2000, even a "borrowed" copy. I know many instances where corporations have opted to keep a previous version of software for standardization.
33 posted on 02/25/2003 9:03:41 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: pt17
I'm running Win 2K, and will not be switching anytime soon. It works perfectly, is stable, easy to firewall, and readily accepts all of my hardware. No XP for me.
34 posted on 02/25/2003 9:04:05 AM PST by Space Wrangler (Now I know what it's like washing windows when there are pigeons on the roof...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: js1138
How about duplicate data that the beastie keeps looking at?
(Kinda like duplicate files under Windows 95... Windoze kinda liked to try and flip between the two.. making the system grind to a halt eventually.)

35 posted on 02/25/2003 9:05:01 AM PST by Darksheare (<====The sky eyes are watching, and blinking for want of Visine...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
My limited understanding of programming, memory leaks are caused by applications and not the operating system. MS created "managed code" in the .NET development languages to handle that very problem. Has something to do with "garbage collection" I think.
My company had some progammers contracted to develop some custom software and they came up with some stuff that had bad memory leaks and would crash the system after about an hour or two.
36 posted on 02/25/2003 9:06:35 AM PST by Abcdefg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
I have XP on 3 home machines and it runs well. After buying Windows 98 (crap on dish), I skipped the ME junk O/S and I have to have 2000 on my office maching (configure it right and it will work). I like XP and have found few problems. My fourth home machine has Redhat 7.2 on it.
37 posted on 02/25/2003 9:08:58 AM PST by bmwcyle (Semper Gumby - Always Flexable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #38 Removed by Moderator

To: MeeknMing
FXP
39 posted on 02/25/2003 9:16:59 AM PST by NY.SS-Bar9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NolanVoid
You are entirely correct. I wasn't clear enough in my reply, the physical hard drive is fine, it should work for years if it is a decent brand. The problem has to do with the way the OS deals with managing data on the drive. For some reason it tends to start "gumming up", I can't get more technical that that, it just gets slower and slower, the disk grinds and grinds away on jobs that used to take a minute and now take ten. And, from what I can tell, it IS unique to the Windows world.
40 posted on 02/25/2003 9:17:11 AM PST by Billy_bob_bob ("He who will not reason is a bigot;He who cannot is a fool;He who dares not is a slave." W. Drummond)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-173 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson