Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam exile only way out: Gorbachev
The Hindu ^ | March 13, 2003

Posted on 03/13/2003 8:20:40 PM PST by Sawdring

Moscow, March 13. (PTI): The former Soviet president Mikhail Gorbachev today said that Saddam Hussein should go in voluntary political exile to avert an imminent US-led war on Iraq.

Gorbachev in 1990-1991 had unsuccessfully tried to avert Gulf War through coercive diplomacy against its ally Iraq.

He believes that a voluntary, self-imposed political exile of Saddam would open the way for the radical changes in the country and the military operation could be cancelled and all his mistakes forgiven.

Speaking at the presentation ceremony of his book "Facets of Globalisation" Gorbachev said that the US would hardly roll back and withdraw its forces from the region, but warned that a war in Iraq would "destroy the entire system for maintaining global security."

"The only way out of this impasse is Saddam's exit from the political scene," he said.

"In my opinion, the only way to avoid a war in Iraq is if Saddam Hussein steps down from the political arena. He must declare his resignation and open the door to changes," Gorbachev was quoted by the Interfax news agency as saying.

He said history had witnessed several examples of a leader stepping down, and cited his own resignation as leader of the former Soviet Union and that of Nicholas II, the last Russian czar who abdicated throne before being killed by Bolshevik revolutionaries.

However, he expressed support for the anti-war stance of Russia, France, Germany and China and warned that the current course of action would drive America into a dead end.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: china; france; germany; gorbachev; iraq; russia; un; us
Gorbachev says US at fault in current Iraqi crisis
Blair and US will reap whirlwind, says Gorbachev; Britain a “satellite” of the United States
Gorbachev: Only U.N. Can OK War With Iraq
1 posted on 03/13/2003 8:20:41 PM PST by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RCW2001; Askel5; flamefront
Bump!
2 posted on 03/13/2003 8:21:44 PM PST by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring
Oh dear ...

This raises all sorts of red flags where the Pope's leading off with the idea was concerned. I don't like it at all.

3 posted on 03/13/2003 8:32:21 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring
cited his own resignation as leader of the former Soviet Union and that of Nicholas II

Yes, well ... they had so much in common, did they not?

This is one of the most chilling things you've ever posted.

4 posted on 03/13/2003 8:33:17 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring
the current course of action would drive America into a dead end

They're always so much more clear when they "send a message".

5 posted on 03/13/2003 8:34:31 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring
Gorbachev. People think he was a progressive, a genius, a man of global peace.

He was nothing but Reagan's chump.

6 posted on 03/13/2003 8:35:43 PM PST by Toskrin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring
Exile! Doh!

Why don't they ever ask me?! I coulda told them this such a long time ago.
7 posted on 03/13/2003 8:36:56 PM PST by RLJVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Askel5
This guy is insane.. How did the US avoid a war with him?

Apparently he thinks that going down in a hail of machine gun fire is basically the same as resigning.

Gorby, don't advise the USA.
8 posted on 03/13/2003 8:37:02 PM PST by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring
Gorbachev should be familiar with the concept of a dead end, having led the Soviet Union into one.

There may be a dead end awaitng us too, but not right now, and not for a long long time to come. And certainly not as a result of securing the safety of our nation.
9 posted on 03/13/2003 8:41:19 PM PST by John Valentine (Writing from downtown Seoul, keeping an eye on the hills to the north.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
How did the US avoid a war with him?

By inviting him to set up shop over here in his digs at the Presidio and busy himself (when not laundering drug profits through Green Cross) hosting his annual State of the World (World State) forum ... a veritable smorgasbord of New World Order consciousness-raising and occultism.

We avoided war with him, in other words, by surrending to him.

I know ... I know ... how could possibly have "surrendered" to a guy who was wooed by Reagan, held captive in a coup and "resigned" from his own government?

They don't call it Leninist Deception Strategy for nuttin. If you don't believe me that the moment of abject weakness is actually a triumph, go ask Sun Tzu.

Former Statesman Snubbed

10 posted on 03/13/2003 8:42:04 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring
Another "has been" failure of an ex-"leader" speaking out.... They must have club meetings now, Carter, x42, and now Gorby.
11 posted on 03/13/2003 8:42:58 PM PST by goodnesswins (Thank the Military for your freedom and security....and thank a Rich person for jobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
Gorbachev should be familiar with the concept of a dead end, having led the Soviet Union into one.

He led the Soviet Union into the "Russia" who, wide-eyed, claims clean hands with regards to the Soviet Terror Network it confected, sustained and controlled(s).

The same Russia who's calling the shots today as the US Keystone Kops do the dirty work of "Democratization" for them.

Brzezinski rightly called Kosovo a "microcosm of what the world is about to be". Folks tend to forget that the embarassment that was Pristina was a big part of that microcosm.

Mining our side of the red carpet we rolled for the Russians?

About at sensible as our opting for a landbridge to the Stans rather than "liberating" the capital in Afghanistan when we had the choice (or so they say) of which present to put on our sleigh and deliver to the world for Christmas.

12 posted on 03/13/2003 8:45:16 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring
Somebody shoot this murderous communist, please.
13 posted on 03/13/2003 8:45:44 PM PST by Guillermo (Sic 'Em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
I guess you fail to notice how everyone ends up taking his advice in the end.

Unless I've missed something -- as he pops up every so often in the Financial Times, New York Times and such -- he's batting 1000.

Let's just wait and see what happens. Perhaps they'll engage in some face-saving measure and assassinate Saddam and his henchmen on prime time as they did with the Prime Minister of Armenia an hour after Strobe Talbott took off towards Moscow.

14 posted on 03/13/2003 8:47:41 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Askel5
as he pops up every so often in the Financial Times, New York Times and such

Sorta like BOTH Bush AND Dole stepping up to the plate during impeachment to argue that actual removal of the Mad Bomber of Sudan would sully the decorum of the semen-stained office.

Excuse us while we "send a message".

15 posted on 03/13/2003 8:48:50 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring
Crap and more crap...
Saddam is the win or die type. He may be a despotic dictator, but he will go down doing as much damage as he can to as many people as he can.
The last thing he will do is go quietly into exile!
16 posted on 03/13/2003 8:53:48 PM PST by cavtrooper21 ("..he's not heavy, sir. He's my brother...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Askel5
How about rephrasing that without the ostentatious, self-conscious verbiage?
17 posted on 03/13/2003 8:57:26 PM PST by Chunga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Chunga
I guess I'm too "self-conscious" to divine what it is you wish rephrased.
18 posted on 03/13/2003 8:59:55 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring
.. <- Gorby's cojones.
oo <-Saddams cojones.
OO <-Bush's cojones.

Guess who's gonna win?
19 posted on 03/13/2003 9:00:50 PM PST by this_ol_patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson