Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Starship Builders (Speculation on UFO Propulsion methods by Physist)
Stardrive ^ | FR Post 3-15-03 (Article update 1999) | by Kim Burrafato

Posted on 03/14/2003 6:19:01 AM PST by vannrox

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: Frank_Discussion
"Question for you boris: Do we have Cherenkov-detectors placed around the planet, either on it or in near space?"

I used "Cherenkov" as an example of potential traces of FTL travel. That's what "e.g." stands for.

And yes, we have lots of such detectors--they are called eyeballs, and almost everyone has a couple.

--Boris

21 posted on 03/14/2003 9:29:43 AM PST by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: boris
Ok, boris, don't be an ass. I was asking seriously, and you fire back vitriol. I know what "e.g." means, don't be so snide.

Do you have an answer to my specific question, or just more deflective bull$hit? I'm irritated with you because I merely asked a real question, to which there should be a real answer, and you decided to stay on your UFO-bashing rant.
22 posted on 03/14/2003 9:34:05 AM PST by Frank_Discussion (Time is the fire in which we burn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
Don't tell me that even NASA got duped by yet another free energy scam..

Humans have some irrational belief that perpetual motion devices are real, and have been scammed by them since the first cavemen.
23 posted on 03/14/2003 9:36:24 AM PST by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
yes, it all was
24 posted on 03/14/2003 9:40:06 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (Just because your paranoid,doesn't mean they aren't out to get you. :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
I always knew Zephraim Cochran was an old drunk. This is where he stole (will steal?) the idea from!

exotic matter will be needed in order to generate a distortion of spacetime like the one discussed here

Haven't they ever heard of dilithium?

25 posted on 03/14/2003 9:41:04 AM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion
"Ok, boris, don't be an ass. I was asking seriously, and you fire back vitriol."

Wait a bit. I haven't really wound up with the vitriol in quite a while.

--Boris

26 posted on 03/14/2003 10:56:05 AM PST by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: boris
Truce? You're not listening, and I didn't want a flame war.

(All the trouble I get for asking a sincere question...)
27 posted on 03/14/2003 11:03:25 AM PST by Frank_Discussion (Time is the fire in which we burn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dark_lord
One thought: if NASA can reduce the effect of gravity on a rocket by just a percentage point, that turns into megabucks per launch of savings.
28 posted on 03/14/2003 11:06:49 AM PST by Poohbah (Beware the fury of a patient man -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: techcor
That reminds me of an idea I had once...I envisioned a magnetic propulsion system, utilizing gyroscopes or whatever (I am NOT well versed in physics), in which a strong magnetic field is created which "attracts" the craft from the front and "repels" the ship from the rear.

Thus the poles for the magnetic field have to be "projected" to a point outside the ship by some sort of field amplifier. The poles have to be reversible to stop.

Also, humans would have to be shielded or isolated from a magnetic field of that strength.

I'm sure this is impossible or someone would have thought of it...but it seems more likely than the other crazy propulsion systems I've read about.

29 posted on 03/14/2003 11:11:18 AM PST by ez (Advise and Consent = Debate and VOTE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
In the 1950's there was a well known cartoon strip that featured SpaceCraft that used magnetism to get around. So, there you go, use powerful magnets to leave Earths' gravity!ha ha hha hahhah, I know it's not that simple.
30 posted on 03/14/2003 11:14:55 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox; Poohbah
Thanks.

I didn't bother with every paragraph but it seems like an impressive enough essay to me.

I do suspect, however, that things are much more progressed beyond this paper than is hinted at.
31 posted on 03/14/2003 11:22:26 AM PST by Quix (MARCH BIBLE CODES DIGEST LATEST RESEARCH COMPARES WAR AND PEACE VS BIBLE W SURPRISES 4 BOTH SIDES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
And how do you filter out the disinformation from the fact, from the conjecture, from the dreaming, fantasies and even sometimes from the mere hogwash?
32 posted on 03/14/2003 11:24:37 AM PST by Quix (MARCH BIBLE CODES DIGEST LATEST RESEARCH COMPARES WAR AND PEACE VS BIBLE W SURPRISES 4 BOTH SIDES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ez
Check out some working technology here
33 posted on 03/14/2003 11:26:15 AM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ez
I'm pretty sure that's impossible because you have to fix the magnetic fields to your craft. It would be like pulling yourself up by your own bootstraps. Actually, I think there was a sci-fi book by that name "The Bootstrap Effect" but I'm not sure who wrote it.

If your interested in near future technology for space travel, look up americium 242m or "Two weeks to Mars" on google. It's 100 times as powerful as plutonium. 1 gram I think was suppose to equal 2 tons of jet fuel. For some reason no one around FR knows about or is interested in it.

One last thought is why do we need matter to transmit momentum? Think about it. If you use a powerful laser, it heats up (i.e. transfers momentum) say a propellant which shoots out the back and the rocket goes forward. Why can't there be just electro-magnetic energy that shoots out the back of the rocket and transfers momentum to the universe in general.

34 posted on 03/14/2003 11:26:23 AM PST by techcor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Quix
Lots of stuff in there has been shot down since.

Alcubierre's "warp drive" has one small problem: ASSUMING you manage to get the thing actually started, it's physically impossible to turn it off.
35 posted on 03/14/2003 11:26:23 AM PST by Poohbah (Beware the fury of a patient man -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: boris
It's plausible that even ET's would have limits placed on their options.

But, Von Braun insisted that after the Iraq war planned in 1970ish, we would be called on to fight the evil ET's--something he considered a hideous hoax--his being convinced all the ET's were benign.

36 posted on 03/14/2003 11:26:46 AM PST by Quix (MARCH BIBLE CODES DIGEST LATEST RESEARCH COMPARES WAR AND PEACE VS BIBLE W SURPRISES 4 BOTH SIDES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
bump for later read
37 posted on 03/14/2003 11:28:02 AM PST by Captain Beyond (The Hammer of the gods! (Just a cool line from a Led Zep song))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
It would be interesting to see your face turn white when a LOT of things start falling out of reality which your biases have precluded from ever happening. . . regardless of the size of your mansion and distance from a trailer park.

Arrogance doesn't look any better on you than chartreuse.
38 posted on 03/14/2003 11:28:09 AM PST by Quix (MARCH BIBLE CODES DIGEST LATEST RESEARCH COMPARES WAR AND PEACE VS BIBLE W SURPRISES 4 BOTH SIDES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ez
Also, check out Myrddin's post to you and "Lifter technology". Someone here said they must be using an "ionic breeze" but according to some of their info it actuall works in a vacuum (which would eliminate that as a theory).
39 posted on 03/14/2003 11:29:25 AM PST by techcor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion
Wonderful to read a balanced reply.
40 posted on 03/14/2003 11:30:15 AM PST by Quix (MARCH BIBLE CODES DIGEST LATEST RESEARCH COMPARES WAR AND PEACE VS BIBLE W SURPRISES 4 BOTH SIDES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson