Translation: don't confuse him with the facts. ;-)
=======
Michael - is it OK if I use the AJNTSA alert? I will cease and desist if you are uncomfortable with it.
Posted on 03/18/2003 5:19:57 AM PST by End Times Sentinel
Terminate Ann Coulter's syndication
Ann Coulter has long been considered one of the worst syndicated columnists in history. Not only is she incapable of critical thinking, but her writing style is banal and full of witticisms that could easily be attributed to an eleven-year old. Nevertheless, some companies still feel that they need to carry her venomous rants. I should point out that National Review, a magazine renowned for its very conservative slant and its bloodthirsty anti-Muslim columnists, elected to terminate Ann Coulter.
As an update, there was a certain amount of activity last week due to an article by World Net Daily. Read some of the emails we received here.
Please take the time to send the letter below to the following links. Please title your emails "Terminate Ann Coulter's Column".
Click here to write to Yahoo Columns.
Write to Conservatism.com.
Email Jewish World Review : schmooze@jewishworldreview.com
Email TownHall.com: info@townhall.com
Email the Conservative Chronicle: conserve@iowaconnect.com
Email World Net Daily: jfarah@worldnetdaily.com, dkupelian@worldnetdaily.com, jkovacs@worldnetdaily.com, dlynne@worldnetdaily.com, amoore@worldnetdaily.com, rstrom@worldnetdaily.com, tambrose@worldnetdaily.com
Write to FrontPage Magazine. These guys are extremely anti-Muslim and fanatic fascists in their pursuit of conservatism. It is run by a David Horowitz, who loves Ann because she suggested that we invade Islamic countries and convert them to Christianity. Little hope of convincing them to drop Ann Coulter, I'm afraid, but we should let them know that she sucks.
Dear Sir/Madam;
I would like to express my total dissatisfaction with your organization's syndication of columnist Ann Coulter. Not only is she one of the worst columnists in recent history, she is also one of the most vindictive and bloodthirsty writers on today's circuit. Ann Coulter's comments on various talk shows and through her columns portray her to be a vindictive, egocentric, and thoroughly anti-Muslim bigot that has the bad habit of speaking before she thinks. Some of her more recent comments include:
[about Muslims] "We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war."
"[Clinton] masturbates in the sinks."---Rivera Live 8/2/99
"God gave us the earth. We have dominion over the plants, the animals, the trees. God said, 'Earth is yours. Take it. Rape it. It's yours.'"---Hannity & Colmes, 6/20/01
To a disabled Vietnam vet: "People like you caused us to lose that war."---MSNBC
"I think we had enough laws about the turn-of-the-century. We don't need any more." Asked how far back would she go to repeal laws, she replied, "Well, before the New Deal...[The Emancipation Proclamation] would be a good start."---Politically Incorrect 5/7/97
It is evident that this "writer" is nothing more than a mouthpiece for ultra-reactionary conservatives, and a blowhard at that. She does not represent American values; her comments fly in the face of everything that Americans stand for, including the conservative population. She is disgusting and vindictive, and is unable to generate a single original idea. Her columns are always about how evil Muslims are, or how all environmentalists should be sentenced to death. Even conservative organizations like the National Review have dropped her syndication, citing a lack of professional ethics and integrity.
I am fairly certain that Ann Coulter does not represent the ideas and values of your company. In fact, the only people she can claim to represent are bigots. I therefore ask that you immediately cancel the appearance of her column from your organization. I also would like to ask that you issue a public statement that informs the media that the reason that Ann Coulter was dropped was because of her paranoid and vindictive bigotry, and that she does not represent the values and the culture of your organization.
Thank you for your time.
Regards,
Translation: don't confuse him with the facts. ;-)
=======
Michael - is it OK if I use the AJNTSA alert? I will cease and desist if you are uncomfortable with it.
GOOD JOB!!! Im certain that 'execute' is likely a bit of hyperbole.
She has legs you know.And a BRAIN, too - which is what REALLY irritates the left. :o)
From http://www.anncoulter.org:Color and emphasis added by me.We'll Pay Them Reparations Later
December 27, 2001IN RESPONSE TO THE attempted bombing last week of an American Airlines jet by Tariq Raja -- aka Abdel Rahim, aka Richard "Saltonstall" Reid IV, aka "Biff" -- the airlines sprang to action with random passenger shoe checks.
According to The New York Times, there is no discernible pattern in the airlines' choice of fliers targeted for aggressive footwear examination. At the Atlanta airport, for example, the passengers whose shoes were searched "included a flight attendant, an elderly black man, a white man wearing a cowboy hat and boots, and an Asian woman with two small children."
New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman responded to this latest attack by summarily announcing that our only choices are to "become less open as a society" or simply "to live with much higher levels of risk."
I think I have another solution. It's something I like to call "ethnic profiling." My logic is this: There is a common thread hidden within 20 years of relentless attacks on America by Muslim extremists: In every one of these attacks by Muslim extremists, there appears to be one or more Muslim extremists involved. This ought to help the airlines engage in more accurate risk assessment.
Tariq "Biff" Raja attended the same mosque as Zacarias Moussaoui, the suspected 20th hijacker in the Sept. 11 attack. (The New York Times has yet to report Tariq's connection to the mosque, though the paper will surely print that fact before any of the media will ever breathe a word about the story reported in the San Francisco Examiner that American jihadist John Walker's father left Mrs. Walker for another man.)
The men who used passenger jets to attack America on Sept. 11 were Muslim extremists.
Last year, our warship, the USS Cole, was attacked by Muslim extremists.
In 1998, U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were bombed by Muslim extremists, killing 212 people and wounding thousands.
In 1996, Muslim extremists exploded a truck bomb outside an Air Force housing complex in Saudi Arabia, killing 19 and injuring hundreds more.
In 1995, five Americans were killed in a car bomb explosion executed by Muslim extremists.
In 1993, the World Trade Center was bombed by Muslim extremists, killing six and injuring thousands.
Also in 1993, Muslim extremists plotted to assassinate then U.S. President George Bush. (Intriguingly, the word "assassin" comes from a Muslim sect active in the 11th to 13th centuries known as "the Assassins" for their religious practice of murdering infidels.)
In 1988, another passenger jet, Pan Am flight 103, was bombed by Muslim extremists, killing 270 people.
In 1986, Muslim extremists bombed a West Berlin discotheque frequented by U.S. servicemen.
In 1985, Muslim extremists seized an Italian cruise ship, the Achille Lauro, and murdered Leon Klinghoffer, a 69-year-old, wheelchair-bound American.
In 1983, Muslim extremists blew up U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut, killing 241 American servicemen.
In 1982, Muslim extremists bombed the U.S. Embassy in Beirut, killing 49 people, including 17 Americans.
In 1979, Muslim extremists stormed the U.S. Embassy in Iran and held American Embassy staff hostage for 444 days.
So naturally, it took the airlines completely by surprise last week when the passenger who tried to detonate a sneaker bomb on a passenger jet turned out to be a Muslim extremist. Doggedly imitating an Alzheimer's joke, the airlines instantly began ever more intrusive examinations of elderly black men, cowboys and Asian women with small children.
Meanwhile, al-Qaida just keeps on coming. The chairman of the London mosque attended by Moussaoui and Raja told the British Broadcasting Corp. he believes there are hundreds more Islamic extremists in Britain lying in wait for their chance to become suicide bombers. He expressed incredulity at the idea that Rahim could have planned the sneaker bomb plot on his own.
Yet the Times' Friedman, in a commonplace formulation, sniffs that ethnic profiling is not "civilized" and then gratuitously attacks "religious fundamentalists of any stripe."
I don't know. Amish extremists have been rather quiescent lately. If all this carnage and murder had been executed by anti-abortion extremists rather than Muslim extremists, it is unlikely that Friedman would be pussyfooting around the issue by referring to the culprits as "political extremists of any stripe."
The refusal to make a connection between Muslim extremists and unending violence by Muslim extremists borders on psychopathological disturbance. Usually the nonsense liberals spout is kind of cute, but in wartime their instinctive idiocy is life-threatening.
In 1996, Osama bin Laden mocked the United States, saying: "Your problem will be how to convince your troops to fight, while our problem will be how to restrain our youths to wait for their turn in fighting."
Our "youths" have taken Kabul, dropped daisy-cutters on Osama's cave, and are now sleeping in their boots in the middle of an Afghan winter while dreaming of Iraq.
But on another front -- the commercial aircraft war-zone opened by al-Qaida -- bin Laden is right: We refuse to fight. Bedraggled smelly men who make Talibanist John Walker look like Beaver Cleaver are getting on airplanes with C4 explosive material, and we commend ourselves for being so "civilized."
Brilliance by Ann was in the original. :o)
I dug this one up, but it's so darn small. I just can't top your's though, gortklattu! Owl_Eagle
" WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
DIVERSITY IS STRENGTH"
When you get the time, could you post a list of quotes from the Bible that condone beating wives? In my studies of the Scripture, I haven't ever seen those quotes. Thanks.
I guess the author thinks that statement is offensive. It's offensive because it's true.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.