[Dan from Michigan]

He's also for "ballistic fingerprinting" for all new firearms.

Then he's an idiot or knows the issue

My congressman is a former FBI agent. He's also pro-2nd Amendment and had the best answer on this issue. Change the barrell and you get around it.

[Dan from Michigan]

Then he's an idiot or knows the issue and is intentionally lying about the effectiveness

[lainie]

That's the thing about John Walsh. He's "pro-cop," which, to liberals means he's anti-crime, avant-garde, and a firebrand out there to protect peoples' liberty and rights, so that the rest of them don't have to get their hands dirty. To me, however, he's blindly pro-cop, and there are some bad cops and bad cop policies out there. He only gives lip service to being anti-crime and for the second amendment. It's like those people who wear little red ribbons and pat themselves on the back for "doing something for AIDS." He's all show. Absolutely not to be trusted. He's in it for John Walsh.

As for SAS, I hate to sound so overly critical, but I agree with the post above. Sending out this press release is interesting I suppose, but the real test was "hey! what are you doing over there with the glass of water!" or "Mr. Walsh, What gives? Would you care to explain yourself?" on the stage. If it resulted in "you're never appearing on our show again!" -- so what?