Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BoycottHollywood.com -- Still Up For Now!!! (Anti-Free Speech Hollyweird Bootlickers Alert!)
May 2, 2003 | Carthago delenda est

Posted on 05/02/2003 6:16:42 PM PDT by Carthago delenda est

Ladies and gentlemen of FreeRepublic.com:

As you may know, and as was reported on both the BoycottHollywood website and Emperor Misha's blog (scroll down), the lowlife, scum-sucking, bloviating, self-absorbed mollycoddles who dare to lecture the rest of us about "free speech" while joyously licking dog feces off Joe Stalin's shoes had gained a temporary victory in having their "talent" agent, the William Morris Agency (Rick Hersh/Rick Bradley - 310.274.7451), pressure the Dotster.com people to take Boycott Hollywood off the web.

The website is still running.

Dotster's official cover-our-rear-ends excuse was to say that the site had not provided accurate contact information. BoycottHollywood responded that this was because those running the site have received numerous death threats, and they did not want this information to be passed to just anybody.

The owner of the site was briefly unable to update her site or access her Email, but this is no longer the case. As of 8pm last night, she was able to do both things, and now the DNS appears to be back to normal. Here's what she says:

"Contact from Dotster with an explanation of what the hell is going on would be a nice thing. But, no word as of yet. I'm not sure what this means - - if the site stays up? Or if it's still scheduled to be taken down? I wish I knew - - however, for now, it seems, we are still here so I just wanted to fire off a note of thank you to everyone who has been supporting this site over this whole William Morris fiasco (oh, I haven't heard from them either).

So, I guess we're hanging in there -- I'm tentatively optimistic about it, but reasonably cynical, as well. :) Good day!"

This website ain't goin' down without a fight, folks! Does anybody have information on how to get in touch with Dotster.com? I've been having trouble doing so. Even though it might be difficult to contact them, it may still be worthwhile to send them an Email or call them up with your thoughts. This may be just what the doctor ordered for keeping BoycottHollywood online. God knows that companies hate to tee off potential customers.

I just want to urge my fellow Freepers to let those involved know your thoughts, and to support BoycottHollywood. Why?

Because Hollyweird must be stopped! Let's put a smackdown on the pukes -- let's give a wedgie to the whiners. Let's play brick dodgeball with those pinksqueak treasonous denizens of Cockroach Central Emporium who hum the Horst Wessel Lied when they're not complaining about their free speech being "violated." Let's break their bones with sticks and stones, and smash the teacups out of their hands as they raise their pinky fingers in an effete salute to Flyover Country. We will burn their seas, ravage their coasts, destroy their livelihoods, and send swarms of splenetic citizens to verbally harass them and eat out their substance! To the barricades, Freepers! To the line! THIS IS WAR! ARE YOU WITH ME???


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: boycotthollywood; freespeech
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Nitro
We haven't been to the movies in 7 years! How's that for a boycott?
21 posted on 05/02/2003 7:40:03 PM PDT by Concentrate (Vote Republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: justme346
Thanks a bunch. I will have to check that out.

It's great that we conservatives now have our own grassroots computer networks and blogsites that can propel these sorts of stories into the news. In the past, this kind of stuff would go totally ignored by almost everyone.
22 posted on 05/02/2003 7:40:26 PM PDT by Carthago delenda est (Hollywood must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: lonewacko_dot_com
That doesn't mean that BH is not in violation of their contract.

In order to accept that, you'd have to believe that "1234 Blah St., NoWhere WI" is a valid address.

As noted earlier, the website could have been registered with another firm in an "owner by proxy" arrangement that would have concealed their identities (unless a judge ordered the proxy to turn over the information).

Instead, the boycott-hollywood.us owners chose to violate the registration agreement by entering a bogus address. Their assertion that they were being threatened is not a legally valid excuse to breach the contract. William Morris complained to dotster.com, and dotster had no choice but to find that boycott-hollywood.us was in violation of the contract. Dotster probably sent the 15-day notice to the owners by USPS mail, but it was undeliverable due to the phony registration info.

The point is - complaining to dotster.com will do no good. boycott-hollywood.us simply needs to find a legitimate way to register their domain name.

23 posted on 05/02/2003 8:06:19 PM PDT by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Concentrate
The last movie that I went to see was "True Lies". And, I walked out in the middle of it. Think I got you beat . . .
24 posted on 05/02/2003 8:44:38 PM PDT by Petruchio (Single, Available, and easy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
You missed a negative. I did not say "That doesn't mean that BH is in violation of their contract," I said "That *doesn't* mean that BH is *not* in violation of their contract."

In other words, BH might be in violation of their contract.

And, so what? William Morris Agency got them on a technicality. Who the hell appointed WMA as the WHOIS Polizei?

Why would WMA complain about someone's WHOIS? Because they're interested in keeping Internet records straight?

Or, did they complain because they thought that it would be a cheap and easy way to muscle this site off the web?

If BH has broken libel or harrassment laws, let WMA sue or get a court order. They will definitely be able to get accurate WHOIS information that way.

Did they do that? So, how is this different from a SLAPP suit then?
25 posted on 05/02/2003 8:48:11 PM PDT by lonewacko_dot_com (http://lonewacko.com/blog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: lonewacko_dot_com
P.S. For various reasons, I think BH sucks. However, if WMA's actions don't get condemned now, they and others will probably try tricks like this in the future. I don't look so askance at (c) claims concerning domain names, but WMA's complaint seems so baseless on its face.
26 posted on 05/02/2003 8:51:43 PM PDT by lonewacko_dot_com (http://lonewacko.com/blog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: lonewacko_dot_com
And, what I wrote above doesn't mean BH shouldn't be smarter. I don't think they're that smart, and that's one of the reasons why I don't like them. The next time around, they should use a proxy or a Mailboxes Etc. address with a voice mail number.
27 posted on 05/02/2003 8:54:12 PM PDT by lonewacko_dot_com (http://lonewacko.com/blog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: lonewacko_dot_com
You missed a negative.

You are correct. That doesn't mean I'm not sorry about that.

Who the hell appointed WMA as the WHOIS Polizei?

Anyone can report that a registration contains false info. My dog could have filed a complaint, and the registrar would be required to act as dotster did in this care.

So, how is this different from a SLAPP suit then?

In the context that WMA filed the complain, it was sort of like a SLAPP. Except it wasn't a lawsuit, it was just a slam dunk complaint.

28 posted on 05/03/2003 1:17:51 AM PDT by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Carthago delenda est
If registrars are going to remove web sites with outdated or missing contact information, there will be quite a few missing. Here's just one leftist site for example: http://www.facesforpeace.org/ and their whois info:

Domain ID:D96367573-LROR
Domain Name:FACESFORPEACE.ORG
Created On:18-Mar-2003 19:21:31 UTC
Expiration Date:18-Mar-2004 19:21:31 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:R71-LROR
Status:TRANSFER PROHIBITED
Registrant ID:71-C
Registrant Name:SEE SPONSORING REGISTRAR
Registrant Street1:Whois Server:whois.register.com
Registrant Street2:Referral URL:www.register.com
Registrant City:N/A
Registrant Postal Code:N/A
Registrant Country:CA
Registrant Email:not@available.org
Admin ID:71-C
Admin Name:SEE SPONSORING REGISTRAR
Admin Street1:Whois Server:whois.register.com
Admin Street2:Referral URL:www.register.com
Admin City:N/A
Admin Postal Code:N/A
Admin Country:CA
Admin Email:not@available.org
Billing ID:71-C
Billing Name:SEE SPONSORING REGISTRAR
Billing Street1:Whois Server:whois.register.com
Billing Street2:Referral URL:www.register.com
Billing City:N/A
Billing Postal Code:N/A
Billing Country:CA
Billing Email:not@available.org
Tech ID:71-C
Tech Name:SEE SPONSORING REGISTRAR
Tech Street1:Whois Server:whois.register.com
Tech Street2:Referral URL:www.register.com
Tech City:N/A
Tech Postal Code:N/A
Tech Country:CA
Tech Email:not@available.org
29 posted on 05/03/2003 3:53:45 AM PDT by RippleFire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RippleFire
You've got the right idea, but a bad example because you did not use the specified whois server to get the full information for facesforpeace.org. In this case, you must use whois at register.com -

That domain appears to have accurate information:

whois facesforpeace.org -

Organization:
Faces for Peace
Tim Hampton
4394 McPherson
St. Louis, MO 63108
US
Phone: 314-371-1507
Email: wordwind@hotmail.com

Registrar Name....: Register.com
Registrar Whois...: whois.register.com
Registrar Homepage: http://www.register.com

Domain Name: FACESFORPEACE.ORG

Created on..............: Tue, Mar 18, 2003
Expires on..............: Thu, Mar 18, 2004
Record last updated on..: Tue, Apr 22, 2003

Administrative Contact:
Faces for Peace
Tim Hampton
4394 McPherson
St. Louis, MO 63108
US
Phone: 314-371-1507
Email: wordwind@hotmail.com

Technical Contact, Zone Contact:
Register.Com
Domain Registrar
575 8th Avenue - 11th Floor
New York, NY 10018
US
Phone: 902-749-2701
Fax..: 902-749-5429
Email: domain-registrar@register.com

Domain servers in listed order:

DNS5.REGISTER.COM 216.21.234.73
DNS6.REGISTER.COM 216.21.226.73

The process of looking up whois information is more complicated since the registration process was decentralized. For .COM, .NET and .ORG top level domains, use the Verisign Global Registry Services for the preliminary lookup. For .US, start at www.whois.us. For .ORG, start at Public Interest Registry whois. In all of those cases, you must then go to the registrars whois server to get the full information.

Keep searching - and use the correct whois servers - and you will certainly find some leftist sites with bogus registration info.

30 posted on 05/03/2003 7:18:48 AM PDT by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Carthago delenda est
Go, go, go! Down with the Hollyweirdo elitists!
31 posted on 05/03/2003 10:57:54 AM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Thanks very much for the tip - I guess I haven't been keeping up on the domain registration hijinks. It used to be so simple (if not necessarily better).
32 posted on 05/03/2003 5:25:33 PM PDT by RippleFire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Carthago delenda est
A chill wind is blowing out of Hollywood, to the rest of the US.
33 posted on 05/03/2003 5:29:58 PM PDT by PeoplesRep_of_LA (Press Secret; Of 2 million Shiite pilgrims, only 3000 chanted anti Americanisms--source-Islamonline!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Bump.
34 posted on 05/04/2003 8:18:30 AM PDT by Concentrate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson