Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canadian Prime Minister Taunts Church: "I Am A Catholic And For Abortion"
Life Site ^ | 5/28/03

Posted on 05/29/2003 2:39:25 PM PDT by marshmallow

Cardinal Ambrozic "Sorry, Disappointed And Upset" With PM's Abortion Stand

ATHENS, May 28, 2003 (LifeSiteNews.com) - In widely reported comments, Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretien, said "I am a Catholic and for abortion." The Prime Minister's remarks were made en route to Athens yesterday during a frank discussion with reporters in which he boasted that he was superior to U.S. President Bush on fiscal and social matters.

Through a spokesman, Cardinal Aloysius Ambrozic commented to LifeSite on the Prime Ministers statement. Moreover, Chretien's bishop, Ottawa Archbishop Marcel Gervais communicated to LifeSite he will also be addressing the matter.

Suzanne Scorsone, the Director of Communications for the Archdiocese of Toronto told LifeSite, "The Cardinal is sorry, disappointed, and upset at what he has seen some newspapers today quoting the prime minister as having said on the subject of abortion." Gabrielle Tasse, Director of Communications for the Archdiocese of Ottawa told LifeSite "The Archbishop will be dealing with the matter in a private manner and will be in touch with the Prime Ministers Office today."

After slamming Bush on financial matters saying, "We still have surpluses. The Americans will have a $500-billion deficit this year and it is a right-wing government. If we were to equal that we would have to have a $75-billion deficit. Imagine!," Chretien took aim at Bush's social policy emphasizing where he differs with the U.S. President. "I am a Catholic and for abortion and he is not," Chretien said.

As LifeSite reported last week, Chretien has become increasingly more brazen in his pro-abortion comments. On May 14 in a speech in Montreal, he was reported as saying that Canada is better than the U.S. since we have abortion rights. During his speech Chretien said, "We don't have big debates on the rights of abortion because we decided a long time ago in Canada it is the choice of women, which is not the case in a lot of U.S. states."

Chretien has even gone so far as to spout his pro-abortion rhetoric at a Catholic school and for which he received condemnation from Ottawa Bishop Marcel Gervais.

Since the reign of Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, Canadian Catholic politicians have been notorious for imposing radical social changes on the country and even abroad which violate serious Church moral teaching. So far, they have not been subject to any removal of Catholic sacramental privileges and have often been able to find some liberal theologian or other church authority to condone their actions. There are increasing signs that this decades long trend may soon change.

To express concerns to the PM:

Rt. Hon. Jean Chretien Prime Minister Government of Canada Parliament Hill Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6 Canada Fax: (613) 941-6900 E-mail: pm@pm.gc.ca


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: abortionlist; catholiclist; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: ChicagoGuy
Although the Pope has personally pronounced his opposition to the death penalty, I do not believe that position is an official part of church doctrine. Correct me if I am wrong.
21 posted on 05/29/2003 3:05:44 PM PDT by ernie pantuso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NetValue
The Catholic Church usually reserves excommunication for recalcatrant bishops and authority figures, not for pew-warming Catholics.

It's RARELY done. I think the last time I heard of someone getting excommunicated in the RCC, it was in reference to a bishop in Africa who "married" a woman in a ceremony performed by Rev. Moon. He repented and the pope took him back.
22 posted on 05/29/2003 3:07:21 PM PDT by Tamar1973 ("He who is compassionate to the cruel, ends up being cruel to the compassionate." Chazal,Jewish sage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tamar1973
Can his priest refuse to give him communion (assuming he shows up for mass once in a while)? Is refusing communion within the discretion of the priest? Is that tantamount to excommunication?
23 posted on 05/29/2003 3:10:29 PM PDT by wimpycat ('Nemo me impune lacessit')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ernie pantuso
The pope's "personal" opposition to the death penalty is not at all like the so-called Catholic politicians' occasionally professed "personal" distaste for abortion. Rather, it's a matter of Christian teaching, set forth in an encyclical and codified in the 1997 Catechism of the Catholic Church. Of course, those who favor this form of killing will immediately say, "Ah, but it's not INFALLIBLE." To which the pro-aborts will say, "And neither is the pro-life stuff since, after all, Thomas Aquinas didn't think embryos had souls." Etc. Ad nauseam. In both cases, we are dealing with cafeteria Catholics.
24 posted on 05/29/2003 3:11:38 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
Well said. I say excommunicate all of them, or none of them.
25 posted on 05/29/2003 3:13:14 PM PDT by ChicagoGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: tiamat
Where is this scum-bag's Bishop?

Most Rev. Martin Veillette, Bishop of Trois-Rivières, Quebec, can be freeped at secretariat@evechetr.org

Surely they don't lack the stones to excommunicate this poltroon?

Yes they do. The Quebec bishops are a notoriously craven lot.

26 posted on 05/29/2003 3:13:50 PM PDT by Loyalist (Keeper of the Schismatic Orc Ping List. Freepmail me if you want on or off it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive
Strange...I have not heard any politicians (or anyone else fot that matter) come out and say, "I am Pentecostal and for abortion!"

Probably because you've never seen a liberal Pentacostal before...and neither have I, come to think of it. There are plenty of people of other denominations that are pro-"choice", though. But "liberal" and "Pentacostal" are pretty much mutually exclusive.

27 posted on 05/29/2003 3:14:48 PM PDT by wimpycat ('Nemo me impune lacessit')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
I am a Catholic and for abortion and he is not.

Basically, M. Chretien is saying that he is a Catholic whose faith means nothing to him, since he doesn't believe in that faith's tenets. And he apparently thinks this is something praiseworthy. Unfortunately, he is like many Catholic politicians (and other Catholics) nowadays for whom left wing party line political correctness is more important than their faith.

28 posted on 05/29/2003 3:17:05 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wimpycat
Can his priest refuse to give him communion (assuming he shows up for mass once in a while)? Is refusing communion within the discretion of the priest? Is that tantamount to excommunication?

From what I have heard/read, yes. The local priest can refuse to give a Catholic access to the Eucharist if they feel that the person is living in a state of unrepented sin.

Refusing to offer eucharist and excommunication are not the same thing. Having to refuse a catholic access to the eucharist due to the issue of cherish, unrepented sin doesn't make one a non-catholic. Excommunication would make the person a non-catholic in the eyes of the church.

29 posted on 05/29/2003 3:17:06 PM PDT by Tamar1973 ("He who is compassionate to the cruel, ends up being cruel to the compassionate." Chazal,Jewish sage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: All
Perhaps then the CAN PM ought to consider starting with his own mother. Should she have been allowed to have an abortion? If she wasn't, should it be done retroactively, given the PM's remarks and position on this issue?
30 posted on 05/29/2003 3:17:37 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
I don't understand what you are saying. Could you clarify what your post#24 mean? As I stated in my post, correct me if I am wrong. I am just a little confused by your remarks.
31 posted on 05/29/2003 3:18:48 PM PDT by ernie pantuso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
He's not a Catholic. He's a different kind of lic(k).
32 posted on 05/29/2003 3:19:57 PM PDT by arasina (Uh oh! I need a new tag line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
Ti-Jean was the 18th of 19 children in his family, only nine of whom survived infancy.

When Quebec was good and Catholic, they didn't have to worry about assimilation by les anglais because they understood what was meant by la revanche des berceaux.

33 posted on 05/29/2003 3:21:22 PM PDT by Loyalist (Keeper of the Schismatic Orc Ping List. Freepmail me if you want on or off it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: All
Christians, who vote for pro-abortion candidates, prolong the duration of this abortion holocaust. Voting records of Christians show that our schools have not taught the truth about the unborn in an effective way as an option to the lies we’ve all been exposed to. When our shepherds express their “sadness and frustration” over their flocks repeated votes for pro-abortion politicians, it must be respectfully pointed out to these shepherds that they did not educate their former students in Christian schools as to WHY they are supposed to be pro-life, to VOTE pro-life. THEY WERE NOT TAUGHT THE TRUTH, so they swallowed the lies. Quite frankly we should not expect these ex-pro-life people to make voting pro-life a priority—we let them down.

It is time for the pro-life movement together with the leaders of the Protestant and Catholic churches to face this simple reality: We are responsible for how our students of today will live and VOTE as adults. If we want them to end this growing culture of death, we must teach and prepare them NOW - in a comprehensive way.
34 posted on 05/29/2003 3:23:37 PM PDT by cpforlife.org (“My people are destroyed from lack of knowledge.” Hosea 4:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: madprof98

Wrong, the CCC states that it is that punishment for criminals belongs to the state. The death penalty is not even close to being on the same level of abortion, and the CCC states that is no other way can be found to protect society, then the death penalty can be used as a option. The Catholics who state pro death penalty Catholics are cafateria Catholics are either "seamless garment" Catholics who are liberal on social matters other than abortion, or Papal Maximalists who take the cult of personality surrounding a Pope alot further than was was in the days of Pope Pius IX.
35 posted on 05/29/2003 3:29:34 PM PDT by JNB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
The Church needs to call his bluff.
36 posted on 05/29/2003 3:32:55 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
I only support abortion when we develop time travel. At that point, I'll develop a list of left-wing politicians' mothers and a large sum in gold or antique money.
37 posted on 05/29/2003 3:34:53 PM PDT by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
they understood what was meant by la revanche des berceaux.

I do not. I would be interested in finding out. Would you mind explaining the phrase above to me? I do not understand why he is making an issue about ABORTION and being CATHOLIC. Usually politicals do it for political gain. This seems contrary to that, but perhaps It is because I know little about Canadian politics.

38 posted on 05/29/2003 3:44:11 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: JNB
Here is what the CCC states.

2267 "Assuming that the guilty party's identity and responsibility have been fully determined, the traditional teaching of the Church does not exclude recourse to the death penalty, if this is the only possible way of effectively defending human lives against the unjust aggressor.


One can make arguements that prisoners on death row have escaped and have murderd other people, as what happened Texas a few years ago whebn a young police officer was killed in the DFW area, or what happens is when condemned prisoners murder other prisoners, as what has taken place many times. The death penalty is linked to the just war issue, and while far more needs to be done to apply the death penalty in a just manner(look no further than the OJ case, even if he was convicted he would not have faced the death penalty because he had money to buy a good team of lawyers), the method of punishment belongs to the state, and is not evil or immoral if the punishment is done justly, much like the case for or against the just war. Seamless Garment for amchurch liberals and Papal Maximalism for neo-conservatives do not cut it when one actually reads the CCC and looks at the real world applications.
39 posted on 05/29/2003 3:44:19 PM PDT by JNB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: wimpycat
But "liberal" and "Pentacostal" are pretty much mutually exclusive.

There are some. But libral by Pentacostal standards is pretty conservitive by almost any other.

I have never met one who is pro-abort.

40 posted on 05/29/2003 3:45:57 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (And this is all part of some evil plot to rule the world as a soggy chimp in my birthday suit!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson