Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DAnconia55; PeaceBeWithYou; MississippiMan; Ahban; TheBattman
Why'd you call your boyfriend? Two can play at that game.

Would y'all care to respond (See posts #9, 23, 30, & 55) because if I say anything more at this point, it will not be very nice and I'm not looking to get myself banned.

57 posted on 07/06/2003 11:21:33 AM PDT by sweetliberty ("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: sweetliberty; Chancellor Palpatine
Why'd you call your boyfriend? Two can play at that game.

Because I figured he'd like a good chuckle. He seems to be amused by you.

Later, we're going to come over to your house and stand out on the sidewalk and sodomize each other while your kids watch.

'Tard. I am not homosexual. I like girls. A LOT.
What I don't like is Fundies.

No wait, you caught me. I needed back up to deal with mental midgets who use hatred and sexual repression as a raison d'etre. Your superior logic skills overwhelmed me, and I had to have reinforcements... lol.

59 posted on 07/06/2003 11:26:17 AM PDT by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: sweetliberty; DAnconia55
55's bromides have already been refuted, yet he continues to insist that the Constitution somehow prevents free citizens from ordering their society as they see fit. This is an error that none of the founders held.

While some areas are off limits, especially to Federal lawmaking, sexual behavior is not one of those areas. The Founders understood that it is a force powerful enough to destroy OUR country, if allowed to run wild.

If the Chancellor and D'Anconia want to sodomize one another, they should leave Texas, or any other state where the citizens exercise their constitutional right to order their society as they see fit, and move to the Blue Zone, where those people can do the same. THAT is the vision of Freedom and Liberty that the Founders had, not rule by a half dozen tyrants in black robes ruling on every law of every local one by one.
64 posted on 07/06/2003 11:32:55 AM PDT by Ahban
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: sweetliberty; DAnconia55
The rankest form of fundamentalist hypocrisy is the fact that you people shriek like a bunch of hysterical old women whenever government does not set forth your religious dogma as government policy - and at the same decry that as a loss of your "freedom" to set rules for everyone else.

I don't see how you do it with a straight face.

67 posted on 07/06/2003 11:37:12 AM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine (and no, I'm not a Libertarian, I vote straight GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson