Posted on 08/07/2003 4:22:34 PM PDT by dead
WASHINGTON - U.S. investigators now believe that a hijacker in the cockpit aboard United Airlines Flight 93 instructed terrorist-pilot Ziad Jarrah to crash the jetliner into a Pennsylvania field because of a passenger uprising in the cabin.
This theory, based on the government's analysis of cockpit recordings, discounts the popular perception of insurgent passengers grappling with terrorists to seize the plane's controls.
The government's findings — laid out deep within the report on the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks that was sent to Congress last month — aim to resolve one of the enduring mysteries of the deadliest terror attacks in U.S. history: What happened in the final minutes aboard Flight 93?
The FBI strenuously maintains that its analysis does not diminish the heroism of passengers who — with the words "Let's roll" — apparently rushed down the airliner's narrow aisle to try to overtake the hijackers.
President Bush and Attorney General John Ashcroft have regularly praised the courage of those aboard Flight 93, some of whom told family members by telephone they were planning to storm the cockpit.
"While no one will ever know exactly what transpired in the final minutes of Flight 93, every shred of evidence indicates this plane crashed because of the heroic actions of the passengers," FBI spokeswoman Susan Whitson said Thursday.
Thirty-three passengers, seven crew members and the four hijackers died.
Citing transcripts of the still-secret cockpit recordings, FBI Director Robert Mueller told congressional investigators in a closed briefing last year that, minutes before Flight 93 hit the ground, one of the hijackers "advised Jarrah to crash the plane and end the passengers' attempt to retake the airplane."
Jarrah is thought to have been the terrorist-pilot because he was the only of the four hijackers aboard known to have a pilot's license.
Mueller's description was disclosed in a brief passage far into the 858-page report to Congress. Previous statements by FBI and other government officials have been ambiguous about what occurred in the cockpit.
Mueller's explanation was based on the FBI's efforts to decipher the cacophonous sounds on the cockpit recorder and produce a comprehensive transcript, said one official, speaking only on condition of anonymity.
The FBI is convinced it may never know for certain what transpired in those final moments, but Mueller represented the information as the FBI's leading theory, this official said.
The same cockpit recording was played privately in April 2002 for family members of victims aboard Flight 93, and the FBI also provided them with its best effort at producing an understandable transcript.
Some family members indicated afterward they were led to believe that passengers used a food cart as a shield and successfully broke into the cockpit.
The FBI has been loath to publicly put forward a contradictory theory out of sensitivity to the families and because of uncertainty about what happened.
People who have heard the recording describe it as nearly indecipherable, containing static noises, cockpit alarms and wind interspersed with cries in English and Arabic. Near the end of the tape, sounds can be heard of breaking glass and crashing dishes — lending credence to the theory that passengers used the food cart to rush the jetliner's narrow aisle.
Separately, the data recorder showed the plane's wings rocking violently as the jet flew too low and too fast for safe flight.
Intelligence officials believe the likely target for Flight 93 was the White House, based on information from Abu Zubaydah, a senior al-Qaida terrorist leader in U.S. custody who is believed to have played a key role in organizing the Sept. 11 attacks.
Prosecutors have sought a U.S. judge's permission to play recordings from Flight 93 during the terrorism trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, the only defendant in a U.S. case prosecutors have directly tied to the attacks. Moussaoui is accused of conspiring with the hijackers.
The government has said it can link Moussaoui to Jarrah, using a telephone number found on a business card recovered at the Shanksville, Pa., crash site. Prosecutors believe the card belonged to Jarrah and that Moussaoui had called the same number.
Moussaoui has acknowledged allegiance to Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida but says he was not involved in the attacks.
___
Or we have to conclude that there was an invisible US Government installation on that empty field that was successfully destroyed. Right, sure.
...in a "Jessica Lynch sort of way."
This is not evidence, Marianne. This is self-serving gobbledegook.
Controlling those aircraft for hundreds of miles at thousands of feet of altitude would require a very powerful transmitter.. no, FOUR very powerful transmitters. . . or a chase plane with the controllers behind each aircraft. If powerful transmitters were used, their presence on the airwaves would have been noted by numerous receivers in the area. To properly control the aircraft AND hit their targets, would require a feedback system of some kind, probably visual, to the hypothetical remote pilots. This is not your average remote control system used by model airplane enthusiasts.
Interfacing a sophisticated remote control system to an aircraft not designed for such is also a difficult task... these planes were in daily use by the airlines that owned them. There was no available window of opportunity to install such a system... and it would have been noticed by any crews using or servicing the aircraft.
Then, Marianne, there is the question of the passengers and crews. If they did not die in the attacks, where are they? Are we to assume they have been kidnapped, spirited away for either summary execution or have they, as part of a grand conspiracy, been given new identities and lives? Some of these "remote missile" conspiracy theorists hold the planes were never occupied. What about the ground crews that enplaned all those passengers... were they in on the conspiracy? Where did the body parts and DNA that matched the victims come from, if they weren't there.
There is more evidence that the events of 9/11 happened the way they were reported than that Captain Donn de Grande exists or his "72 hour marathon" investigation ever took place outside of the mind of the author of this article.
Which diminishes nothing.........
The news articles I read said that the planes sent to intercept the airliners were unarmed and it would have been necessary for the Air National Guard pilot to ram the airliners with their fighters. Also most of the Air National Guard pilots were also airline pilots.
Mission aborted Sand Nazi.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.