Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MSNBC- Recall election to be delayed
Pete Williams MSNBC ^ | Pete Williams

Posted on 09/15/2003 10:18:32 AM PDT by Ragirl

California Appeals Court - Recall should be blocked!!!

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 2003election; 9thcircuit; 9thcircuitcourt; circus; circustent; davisrecalleelection; democrap; dirtytricks; election2003; floriduhagain; graydavis; impeachthe9th; outofcontrol; recall; thefixisin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 801-811 next last
To: justshe
Interesting re your #200!
221 posted on 09/15/2003 10:58:18 AM PDT by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: Peach
The NJ case was appealed from the State Supreme court directly to SCOTUS, not from a Federal Appeals Court. I do not know if this makes any difference, but it seems to me it should.
222 posted on 09/15/2003 10:58:28 AM PDT by woodyinscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
Here come the illegals - getting their motor-voter drivers license vote registations JANUARY 1st, 2004!!!
223 posted on 09/15/2003 10:58:43 AM PDT by flamefront (To the victor go the oils. No oil or oil-money for islamofascist weapons of mass annihilation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Peach
I'd say what was on my mind about what needs to be done about these damned activist judges, but doing so would get FR and me in hot water.
224 posted on 09/15/2003 10:58:52 AM PDT by King Prout (people hear and do not listen, see and do not observe, speak without thought, post and not edit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Ragirl
Time that we admited to ourselves we are no longer a republic, nor even a democracy, but rather a judiciocracy (to coin a term).
225 posted on 09/15/2003 10:58:54 AM PDT by Vast Buffalo Wing Conspiracy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach
I agree with Rush on this. The SCOTUS don't want to get involved in elections again, especially state ones.
226 posted on 09/15/2003 10:59:04 AM PDT by rintense (9-11-01: Never Forget.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
Why can't California borrow some election machines from another state that isn't using them during this period?
227 posted on 09/15/2003 10:59:28 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Tree of Liberty
SCOTUS does not have to assemble to rule on this. Judge Napolitano on Fox, right now, is saying that the Circuit Justice on this is Kennedy. I believe he's wrong on that.

He is also saying that the one Justice can only stay the lower court's order for a limited time "to let the whole Court decide whether to take the case." On this he is DEAD WRONG. I obtained exactly such an Order in September, 1976 compelling the State of Texas to put Eugene McCarthy on their ballot for President in 1976. That Order stood, and the Supreme Court NEVER did take that case.

I'll follow up with other comments as I read through these comments.

John / Billybob

228 posted on 09/15/2003 10:59:32 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Everyone talks about Congress; I am doing something about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Am I Blue?
after January 1 the illegals will vote...aarg!
229 posted on 09/15/2003 10:59:37 AM PDT by Republicus2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Federal Election Law is fairly clear on Presidential elections. Bush V. Gore was about a State Court trumping a Federal Election. This is different in that it is a Federal Court trumping a State Election and State Law.

It is iffy on how this might come out.

230 posted on 09/15/2003 10:59:39 AM PDT by Credo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: grayout
Well that's a fat LIE! I live in a wealthy district and WE HAVE PUNCH CARDS!
231 posted on 09/15/2003 10:59:40 AM PDT by Cinnamon Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: King Prout
I'm having the same thoughts.
232 posted on 09/15/2003 10:59:57 AM PDT by CheneyChick (Yes on Recall, No on Bustamante. JoinArnold.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: Tree of Liberty
Good point. I don't think I understand the issues well enough to correct Rush.

But I like your thinking:-)
233 posted on 09/15/2003 11:00:18 AM PDT by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: justshe
knowing this court, they will take the case, stay the order, let the election proceed, then uphold the Circuit Court decision next summer, leaving the election results intact but forever in question - did I nail their style or what?
234 posted on 09/15/2003 11:00:20 AM PDT by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon Girl
I would NOT be surprised if the supreme court declined to hear this...They have declined many other important issues like the miguel estrada nomination...which could have put an end to this BS.
235 posted on 09/15/2003 11:00:24 AM PDT by Capitalism2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
The SCOTUS is scattered about on vacation.
236 posted on 09/15/2003 11:00:26 AM PDT by flamefront (To the victor go the oils. No oil or oil-money for islamofascist weapons of mass annihilation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red
I was able to vote with PUNCH CARDS without any difficulty.

That's because you're not a MORON. Morons, however, are the protected elite now in our country. After all, how can liberalism survive without them? Soon there will be a ruling that decrees that every MORON must be accompanied into the booth by a government "helper". Guess which party will benefit from that.
237 posted on 09/15/2003 11:00:30 AM PDT by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: mwl1
there is a difference in this case from NJ...NJ was a state court...9th is a Federal...the USSC had BETTER be concerned about a Federal court...frankly, they should have no jurisdiction, it's a state matter. That might be their ticket out, they can void the 9th's ruling since it is a state matter. I know the 9th is involved since FEC gets involved, but that might be seen as weak in this case.
238 posted on 09/15/2003 11:00:32 AM PDT by Keith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: doodlelady
Apparently it will now be appealed to SCOTUS so this is NOT final by any means.

And SCOTUS will spank the 9th circuit. :)

The recall will go forward.

239 posted on 09/15/2003 11:00:33 AM PDT by veronica (http://www.PetitionOnline.com/bombings/petition.html - Homicide bombings = war crimes - sign this!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Ragirl
And the elites are saying:

This revolution - is ovah!
240 posted on 09/15/2003 11:00:46 AM PDT by Penner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 801-811 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson