Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hoffman, Dumas sentenced to jail
yuma sun ^ | LOREN LISTIAK

Posted on 10/09/2003 8:38:46 AM PDT by AZ GRAMMY

Hoffman, Dumas sentenced to jail

BY LOREN LISTIAK, Staff Writer Oct 9, 2003

Two men who used handguns and handcuffs to detain a group of illegal immigrants near Gadsden were sentenced to jail Wednesday by a judge who said their actions were not only against the law but misguided and un-American.

Yuma County Superior Court Judge Andrew Gould sentenced Matthew Hoffman to 120 days in jail with credit for 17 days he served after his arrest for detaining the group. Alexander Dumas, meanwhile, was given a 30-day jail term with credit for 16 days served.

Gould also placed both men on probation for three years, warning them that if they violate the terms of their probation, they could be sentenced to prison.

"This case is not about protecting the American border," Gould said before sentencing Hoffman, 23, and Dumas, 26. "This case is about a criminal act."

Two of the immigrants detained in the July 31 incident near County 18 Street and the Colorado River were women, while the four others were minors ranging in age from 8 to 17.

Noting that the 8-year-old was among the handcuffed minors, Gould told the defendants that their actions were not what the United States is about. The judge said Americans believe in treasuring, valuing and protecting children, no matter their nationality.

"Don't go wrapping yourself in an American flag," Gould told the defendants.

Gould also noted pistols may or may not have been pointed at the victims, but it was certain that guns were brandished by the defendants during the incident.

During mitigation hearings on Oct. 3 and Tuesday, both defendants said when they ran across the group, the women and children were already on the ground in an apparent attempt to hide from them.

The two women and three of the children were then handcuffed while they were still on the ground, according to testimony. The other child wasn't handcuffed because Dumas and Hoffman had only five pairs of handcuffs, Dumas said in his mitigation hearing.

Dumas said when Hoffman started handcuffing the children, he had doubts they were doing the right thing. Twice he tried to convince Hoffman to let the group go, but Hoffman refused, according to Dumas.

Gould said one of the mitigating factors — factors supporting a lighter sentence — for Dumas was his attempt to stop Hoffman from handcuffing the children. The judge also said Dumas played a lesser role than Hoffman in the incident.

"You were the organizer," Gould told Hoffman.

The judge described the incident as "misguided," even if the defendants, at the time, thought the act was legal. Gould added that what Hoffman and Dumas did wasn't legal.

Dumas and Hoffman were each initially charged with six counts of aggravated assault, five of unlawful imprisonment and one of conspiracy to commit unlawful imprisonment. Most of the charges were dropped in return for each defendant pleading guilty to a single count of conspiracy to commit unlawful imprisonment.

Hoffman's brother, Martin, also was arrested in the incident, but has pleaded innocent to the same 12 counts.

--- Loren Listiak can be reached at llistiak@yumasun.com or 539-6857.

Alexander Dumas, 26, is escorted by Yuma County Sheriff's Office deputies to the Yuma County Adult Detention Center on Wednesday after he was sentenced to 30 days in jail and three years' probation. Matthew Hoffman, 23, was sentenced to 120 days in jail and three years' probation. Both will get credit for time served. Sun photo by Louie Villalobos.

Alexander Dumas, 26 (top), and Matthew Hoffman, 23 (above) are escorted by Yuma County Sheriff's Office deputies to the Yuma County Adult Detention Center on Wednesday after they were sentenced for their roles in the July 31 detention of six illegal immigrants. Sun photo by Louie Villalobos.

Alexander Dumas (from left), his lawyer Jon Ballos, Matthew Hoffman and his lawyer James Tilson, appear before Superior Court Judge Andrew Gould on Wednesday morning for sentencing. Sun photo by Charles Whitehouse.

Yuma County Superior Court Judge Andrew Gould speaks to Alexander Dumas and Matthew Hoffman during the two men's sentencing Wednesday morning. Sun photo by Charles Whitehouse.

http://yumasun.com/artman/publish/articles/story_7640.shtml


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: aggravatedassault; detainedillegals; handcuffingillegals; illegalimmigrants

1 posted on 10/09/2003 8:38:46 AM PDT by AZ GRAMMY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AZ GRAMMY
I bet the a@@ of a judge thinks the illegals should have been allowed to stay in the country. Is this guy a RAT?
2 posted on 10/09/2003 8:43:18 AM PDT by sticker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Got a minute?
I'd really like you to rub my ears,
or help out FR.

3 posted on 10/09/2003 8:45:18 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ GRAMMY
I'll probably get flamed for this, and I'm not for illegal immigration, but...

Who the heck carries around five pairs of handcuffs? Were these guys off-duty police? If not, and they're patrolling the desert looking for illegal crossers, I'm all for it but, hey! Find out whether or not it's legal first! Sheesh.

4 posted on 10/09/2003 8:46:51 AM PDT by Egon (I collect spores, molds, and fungus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sticker
The REPUBLICAN judge is not an @$$. He is one of the best in Yuma county.
5 posted on 10/09/2003 8:53:10 AM PDT by Umanbean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Egon
I bet they used zip-ties, perhaps...
6 posted on 10/09/2003 9:03:45 AM PDT by mallardx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Umanbean
The REPUBLICAN judge is not an @$$. He is one of the best in Yuma county.

How can stopping criminals in the process of committing a crime be considered criminal behavior?

7 posted on 10/09/2003 9:19:12 AM PDT by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tbpiper
He sounds like an ASS to me. He is 180 degrees out. He should be praising those American citizens who are enforcing the law, while the law enforcement community fails to do so. And where are these poor mexicans now?
8 posted on 10/09/2003 9:34:49 AM PDT by ampat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AZ GRAMMY
This judge is more anti-American than these men. I smell a demoRAt.
9 posted on 10/09/2003 9:39:56 AM PDT by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Umanbean
If he is a Republican, it makes me sad that he punishes Americans for catching criminals.
10 posted on 10/09/2003 9:41:35 AM PDT by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AZ GRAMMY
The best way for "vigilantes" to bring attention to illegal immigration is not to detain illegals unless they are on their own the "vigilantes" private property.

However, a $200 GPS transiever and a two way radio would work wonders. Calling the Border Patrol each and every time an illegal is spotted.
11 posted on 10/09/2003 9:44:20 AM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tbpiper
How can stopping criminals in the process of committing a crime be considered criminal behavior?

Welcome to the topsy turvy American legal racket.

Cordially,

12 posted on 10/09/2003 9:54:52 AM PDT by Diamond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Egon
...Who the heck carries around five pairs of handcuffs? Were these guys off-duty police? If not, and they're patrolling the desert looking for illegal crossers, I'm all for it but, hey! Find out whether or not it's legal first! Sheesh.

Following your logic, the next time I see a crime being committed...a mugging or perhaps a rape...I'll just keep walking and ignore it since I'm not sure "...whether or not it is legal for me to interfere".

13 posted on 10/09/2003 9:57:05 AM PDT by albee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tbpiper
How can stopping criminals in the process of committing a crime be considered criminal behavior?

Part of the answer is because laws are now written so that they generate the highest amount of dollars going to lawyers (demoncRATS/Clinton scum-like peoples). Laws aren't written to make sense...

14 posted on 10/09/2003 10:22:14 AM PDT by 69ConvertibleFirebird (Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ampat
"And where are these poor mexicans now?"

They're in their lawyer's office right now drawing up the law suit they will file to bankrupt these two patriots and take all their property. Since when was defending one's country and one's home from invasion ILLEGAL! G-ddamn it! These friggin' illegals have more rights than I do!
15 posted on 10/09/2003 10:32:32 AM PDT by ought-six
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 69ConvertibleFirebird; Diamond
Welcome to the topsy turvy American legal racket.

Glad to hear you guys say this, thought I was the only one thinking that way. Seems like what we have is not a justice system but a justice industry in which we are the raw materials.

16 posted on 10/09/2003 10:46:01 AM PDT by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tbpiper
Seems like what we have is not a justice system but a justice industry in which we are the raw materials.

Yes, and BIG LAWYER is more deadly and has more lobbying power than Big Tobackie. DemoncRATs fight tort reform like it's going to kill them. Which, I guess it would, since demoncRATs depend so heavily on donations from Big Lawyer.

17 posted on 10/09/2003 10:50:56 AM PDT by 69ConvertibleFirebird (Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: albee
I suppose one could take my logic to that extreme...

I generally don't carry five sets of handcuffs and go tooling around in the middle of the desert hoping a rape will happen, though. I'm thinking these guys were looking for an instance of border-incursion. Again, I'm not against that, I just think if you're obviously on the lookout for this type of crime, and go to the trouble of equipping yourself to handle it-- you might want to stop and consider whether or not you're going to get thrown in jail afterward.

18 posted on 10/09/2003 10:55:25 AM PDT by Egon (I collect spores, molds, and fungus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Egon

Well guys its been over a year. Wonder how the boys are doing now. They had the right arm of the law sentenced. Any thoughts? I know them both personally.


19 posted on 12/19/2004 9:56:55 PM PST by StupidActions (1 Year 2 Months Later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: StupidActions
I wish both of them the best. I hope they get their ducks in a row before they try anything like this again.

Sorry to say, they still remind me of the people I grew up with in South Dakota who believed that, if you could just make it into town, that Highway Patrol car chasing you wouldn't be able to pull you over. Another pleasant myth that you can sit around and discuss in jail.

20 posted on 12/20/2004 4:31:56 AM PST by Egon (Government is a guard-dog to be fed, not a cow to be milked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson