Posted on 03/03/2006 8:40:09 AM PST by NYer
In digging through his cached files, I found this post from Feb. 12. Do you suppose this is the smoking gun?
Some people have reacted harshly to my posting criticizing Fr. Bob Hoatson.
The common claim is that, by criticizing Fr. Hoatson, I am tacking side with corrupt bishops, the abusive priests and a system that pretends to “perpetuate” the abuses and keep the Church in “business as usual” despite the drama of the sex scandal.
I have nothing to say to those who have already an agenda like SNAP, for whom you either support everything they say or you are in favor of abuse, cover up, and so forth… if you are not a child abuser yourself.
But let me set the record straight one more time. There are MANY, not just “good” and “bad” guys in this complex issue. As far as I can see:
Regarding the latest, read what Forbes Magazine said in a long, extremely revealing report on the economic and legal side of the scandal:
“Plaintiff lawyer Roderick MacLeish Jr. and other litigators have parlayed the priest crisis into a billion-dollar money machine, fueled by lethal legal tactics, shrewd use of the media and public outrage so fierce that almost any claim, no matter how bizarre or dated, offers a shot at a windfall.
The lawyers are lobbying states to lift the statute of limitations on sex abuse cases, letting them dredge up complaints that date back decades. Last year California, responding to the outcry over the rash of priest cases, suspended its statute of limitations on child sex abuse crimes for one year, opening the way for a deluge of new claims. A dozen other states are being pushed to loosen their laws.
“There is an absolute explosion of sexual abuse litigation, and there will continue to be. This is going to be a huge business,” MacLeish, age 50, says. A Boston-based partner of the Miami law firm of Greenberg Traurig (2002 billings: $465 million), he has won upwards of $30 million in settlements for more than a hundred plaintiffs in lawsuits in the past decade. With a hit man’s style and a gift for TV sound bites, he has played a key role in unearthing (and exploiting) the priest scandals of the past two years, prompting a nationwide cascade of similar reports.
In the resulting wave of lawsuits the majority of cases are legitimate, even officials of the Catholic Church concur. Dioceses will pay dearly for covering up the most abominable crimes and failing to prevent future offenses.
Overdue justice. But it could lead to a legal morass marked by extortion as much as fairness, in which a small cast of liars cashes in on the real suffering of victims. “Just think how this ripples out: day care, babysitters, Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, summer camps, study-abroad programs. You start thinking about it, and it boggles the mind,” says Patrick Schiltz, associate dean of the law school at the University of St. Thomas in Minneapolis, Minn. “There is impact in the tens of billions of dollars.”
Want to know a little bit more about this guy MacLeish and the likes?
Read this, also from Forbes:
“This lawyer relishes juicy cases. In 1995 he successfully defended Harvard Medical School psychiatrist John Mack, who was threatened with losing his tenure after he published a book arguing that alien abductions were real. He successfully defended Lars Bildman, disgraced chief executive of drugmaker Astra USA, against sexual harassment complaints. He also defended a Cape Cod high school teacher who got fired for making porno films in his spare time and he generated headlines when he sued the elderly wife of an alleged pedophile, collecting on her homeowner’s policy.”
I think this is quite ilustrative. And this brings to my point:  I don’t think Catholics should seat and take the pounding for something that has become an industry that may cripple our communities. Making justice within the Catholic Church is not the same as lynching the Catholic Church.
"I was appalled. Why are American Catholics so liberal? Besides being inaccurate, it was inappropriate."
American Catholics and American churches is painting with a pretty broad brush, don't you think? That would also include the eastern churches which are about as "liberal" as Margaret Thatcher, not to mention our more traditional bretheren in the western church.
Wouldn't it be interesting if, upon further reflection, this Priest decided to become bi-ritual? Or to simply head east?
The Melkites would love him. And let's just say that we would all be on Irony Alert if he were to find a nice place with the Byzantines.
A wicked thought, I know. But I couldn't resist :-)
NY, those cached links work for me. Are you clicking on "cached" each time?
I never hear sermons condemning abortion or the homosexual lifestyle.
&&
Same here. It's shameful.
Reading the lives of some Saints I discovered that often they obeyed their Bishops or other superiors even when the Bishop was wrong in their views.
They obeyed even though it did cause great spiritual and mental anguish to themselves. Because they knew that their rightness was known to God. This priest is surely speaking the truth and no doubt God will make sure that in good time the priest's message will be heard and embraced. Especially by the Bishop. Meanwhile the priest should bear the duty of obedience he promised with grace and humility.
You are absolutely correct!!
I was referring to the above post. If you click on 'Main' or any of the others, it takes you to a dead end.
It sure was. Thanks NYer.
But at that time the Bishops were not part of Satan's conspiracy.
I don't think the phase " The road to hell is paved with the skull of Bishops" is a contemporary one. Perhaps another reader will know the source and post it.
Saint John Chrysostom (347-407) said "The floor of hell is paved with the skulls of Bishops".
http://www.chrysostom.org/
Also "But at that time the Bishops were not part of Satan's conspiracy".... well... Unfortunately, we've had that problem since the start. Remember Judas, tares among the wheat, etc.
I defer to those with more knowledge. However, I believe a new and improved Satan's Conspiracy began in the 1960s.
We do well to remind ourselves that the " gates of hell will not prevail". It also can never hurt and always help to recite the St. Michael prayer.
"Coincidentally, this week, Alejandro Bermudez..."
Get ready for the underground?
Ping to #15
Alejandro said that his blogging had turned into a second full-time job. He couldn't afford to do both his job at CNA and Catholic Outsider.
"I did an awful lot of deliverance work, and the bishop shut it down," claimed Father Altier. "He said he didn't want any priest in his diocese doing this."
I'm wondering just what this part means? Was he performing exorcisms of some kind or just advocating the Sacrement of Confession?
bttt
Yes, that is what he said. The same is true for other bloggers like Patrick Madrid and Domenico Bettinelli, to name just two. Some will take a sabatical or limit their blog postings to just one every few days. In the case of Alejandro Bermudez, he made that statement and then totally eradicated his blog. It was all very sudden. Bishops are quite powerful. Upset one and they will rapidly smack you down. Perhaps I am reading more into this than is factual ... it's just a hunch.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.