In case it hasn't been noticed . . . I leave the more scholarly responses to those better recently read on the topic. I just enjoy highilighting absurdities and poking at haughty, self-righteous prissy-ness based on . . . smoke and mirrors and hollow power mongering and politically advantageous legends.
You wrote:
“In case it hasn’t been noticed . . . I leave the more scholarly responses to those better recently read on the topic.”
Then there’s at least one right thing you’ve done.
“I just enjoy highilighting absurdities and poking at haughty, self-righteous prissy-ness based on . . . smoke and mirrors and hollow power mongering and politically advantageous legends.”
Your posts are the absurdity. When Protestants can’t compete in the arena of idea or history or theology they post strings of invective to cover their own sciolism. “Prissy-ness”? So, having facts and knowing history is now reduced to “prissy-ness” by the losing side, the Protestant side? It figures. You can’t make an argument or prove your point, or even have a decent showing so you might as well do what Protestants do best - protest.