Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The papacy 1,000 years ago
National Catholic Reporter ^ | June 22, 2009 | Richard McBrien

Posted on 06/22/2009 7:28:34 PM PDT by Alex Murphy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 221-228 next last
To: MarkBsnr

I won’t put anyone’s name here where they can be ridiculed and mocked. Sorry.


161 posted on 06/24/2009 8:03:44 PM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr

She’s a sinner, saved by grace and delivered from satan by the hand of God. She’s no better or worse than any of the rest of us. We’re all sinners. I thank God she came to know our Saviour and her life was turned around.


162 posted on 06/24/2009 8:09:47 PM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
You guys are so funny...Here's some advice...Don't give up your day job...

And what's this I hear about your pope???

He was having a theological discussion with a cardinal and decided he had to go into the Vatican basement to check out some old archives...

Turns out the Cardinal heard this screaming, bawling and crying and ran down the stairs to come to the aid of the pope...

He got there and the pope had a book open and the tears were running down his face and the cardinal ask 'what is it'???

The pope says, 'it says CELEBRATE, not celebate...

Ahh, that's life in Rome...

163 posted on 06/25/2009 4:55:47 AM PDT by Iscool (I don't understand all that I know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
God is not time-bound, we are. Time is part of the Creation, not a property or restriction on the Creator.

God is outside of time but man is not.

Now Jesus is not only true God, He is also true man. Thus, when the Second Person of the Trinity took upon Himself our humanity, He was born into time. He was born "at the fullness of time", as Scripture says.

Jesus is not outside of time by virtue of His human nature. He did not exist from all eternity for it required Mary's "yes" to bring about that union of God and man. Without Mary's "yes", there is no Jesus.

Thus OT times "predate" Jesus. They do not predate the second person of the Holy Trinity who is one with the Father.

164 posted on 06/25/2009 7:03:10 AM PDT by marshmallow ("A country which kills its own children has no future" -Mother Teresa of Calcutta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow; Iscool; Marysecretary
Thank you for sharing your testimony, dear marshmallow!

Jesus is not outside of time by virtue of His human nature. He did not exist from all eternity for it required Mary's "yes" to bring about that union of God and man. Without Mary's "yes", there is no Jesus.

Whereas I understand the importance some give to Mary’s having said “yes” – by my Spiritual understanding, it is truly beautiful but not as important simply because nothing can thwart the will of God.

And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to [our] father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham. – Matthew 3:9

On the main issue, we shall continue to disagree.

I aver that Jesus lives timelessly, He is the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world. Even enfleshed, He had life in Himself.

For as the Father hath life in himself; so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself; - John 5:26

Or to put it another way, He didn’t stop being God when He was enfleshed.

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

In him was life; and the life was the light of men. And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not. - John 1:1-5

Thus I aver the Name Jesus, like He Himself, did not begin in Mary's womb though certainly we celebrate His incarnation and resurrection!

Or to put it another way, the Name which was announced to Mary who was “in” time came from “beyond” time, just like the Name which was announced to Moses who was “in” time came from “beyond” time.

And, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shalt call his name JESUS. - Luke 1:31

And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you. – Exodus 3:14

I cannot time-stamp when God's Name became Truth, only when He chose to reveal that Truth to us.

Thus we shall not agree on the point – in your understanding, the Name Jesus had a beginning "in" time – in mine, His Names are not time bound because He is timeless.

Though I hasten to add, that Jesus' being enfleshed was how He chose to create and sacrifice His own Blood - timelessly, as God - for our redemption. The blood of a mere created being - whether ox or man - would not do.

Nevertheless, thank you for this opportunity to enter my testimony!

God’s Name is I AM.

165 posted on 06/25/2009 8:08:24 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary

No traditions of man, just traditions of God, like the scriptures are — we don’t come up with our own flawed interpretations like those outside The Church do. When you have sola scriptura you have Jehovah’s witnesses, Gene Robinson and Mormons as the ultimate end — oh, and also Unitarian-universalists.


166 posted on 06/25/2009 8:14:22 AM PDT by Cronos (Ceterum censeo, Mecca et Medina delendae sunt + Jindal 2K12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Ah, but Sola Scriptura says that you can have a kirk of one, so you can interpret ANYTHING, you can listen to any angel or voice in your head and understand scripture to mean anything.

It's like saying an ant can understand the complexity of the hive. Even more infinitesimal is The Godhead. By no means can one individual comprehend it all, only as a group, as A Church stretching back 2000 years can we even START to understand it
167 posted on 06/25/2009 8:18:27 AM PDT by Cronos (Ceterum censeo, Mecca et Medina delendae sunt + Jindal 2K12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr
Fair enough. The Church, on the other hand, makes public the names of all of its officials, clergy, laity appointed to Church posts, etc

Well, we are not an esoteric secret gnostic meeting of folks. Don't want to upset those who do belong to such groups (and they are inevitably OUTSIDE The Church)
168 posted on 06/25/2009 8:21:40 AM PDT by Cronos (Ceterum censeo, Mecca et Medina delendae sunt + Jindal 2K12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
The pope says, 'it says CELEBRATE, not celebate...

It's spelt celIbate......
169 posted on 06/25/2009 8:22:31 AM PDT by Cronos (Ceterum censeo, Mecca et Medina delendae sunt + Jindal 2K12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy; All

Thanks for the post, I found it quite interesting. I find all Church history interesting, even the “dark” portions, as it shows how the Church *must* be protected by God or else would have failed long ago.

IOW, I don’t think it’s in dispute by any serious historian, that there have been many Popes throughout history that have not acted with the appropriate dignity afforded the office. This shows the Hand of God on the Church, despite the failings of men in Her Magisterium.

Father McBrien may have a theological axe to grind here, but the history cannot be denied. Nor should it, for the reason stated above.

For this reason, and perhaps also given the nature of some posts on this thread, I think it’s important to point out the salient point for all on this thread to read: Simply because a person has some personal faults, in no way diminishes any theological truth they may enjoy.

“Guilt” via character assassination is for the liberal. Let’s all remember that.


170 posted on 06/25/2009 9:31:32 AM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
No traditions of man, just traditions of God, like the scriptures are — we don’t come up with our own flawed interpretations like those outside The Church do. When you have sola scriptura you have Jehovah’s witnesses, Gene Robinson and Mormons as the ultimate end — oh, and also Unitarian-universalists.

That's a odd statememt...Morman aren't sola scripture...They created their own bible just as you guys created your catechism and tradition...They are more like you than anyone...And just as relavant...

171 posted on 06/25/2009 12:12:44 PM PDT by Iscool (I don't understand all that I know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

great posts as usual...thanks...


172 posted on 06/25/2009 12:16:47 PM PDT by Iscool (I don't understand all that I know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
Jesus is not outside of time by virtue of His human nature. He did not exist from all eternity for it required Mary's "yes" to bring about that union of God and man. Without Mary's "yes", there is no Jesus.

So without Mary, there'd be no Jesus, eh??? The fact that this was prophesied a few years in advance shows that it was a done deal...

Mary's permission wasn't needed at at...In fact, her knowledge of the operation wasn't even necessary for it to happen...

If Jesus' only role was to be the head of the body, the church, it could have been any girl and she wouldn't have to know she was carrying God's child...Some young fella coming up claiming to be God and performing miracles like Jesus did would probably be enough for the church to believe in...

But Jesus came as the Messiah to the Jews, something they had been promised for years...And for that role, certain things had to happen and some rules had to be followed, ie, the lineage thing...

You guys got it wrong...Mary wasn't blessed because she said 'I do'...She was blessed because she was born and chosen for the role well ahead of time...

173 posted on 06/25/2009 12:32:49 PM PDT by Iscool (I don't understand all that I know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Iscool

Well said, Iscool.


174 posted on 06/25/2009 12:34:03 PM PDT by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
Thank you so much for your encouragements, dear brother in Christ!
175 posted on 06/25/2009 12:58:11 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

He doesn’t seem to belong to an order; he is a secular priest (no pun intended). But he is not incardinated in South Bend; he is a priest of the archdiocese of Hartford.


176 posted on 06/25/2009 1:54:39 PM PDT by B Knotts (Calvin Coolidge Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
You guys got it wrong.

So you keep insisting.

That would be me....and Aquinas.....and numerous Church councils in every age.....and Bernard.....and Bede....and Basil.......and.....well you get the picture!

Duffers one and all!!

BTW, I find posts like your last one hugely entertaining.

The complete lack of self-second guessing with which you dispense your half-baked theology is truly appealing....:-)

177 posted on 06/25/2009 2:07:37 PM PDT by marshmallow ("A country which kills its own children has no future" -Mother Teresa of Calcutta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts

Yep, I found that out and posted that in a later post. :)


178 posted on 06/25/2009 2:12:28 PM PDT by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

***Well, we are not an esoteric secret gnostic meeting of folks.***

Not to hear the opposition. Except of course, when they find out that the Church is not secret, they simply blow it off and claim that it was formerly secret and that the Vatican vaults contain all the proofs that their little cults have always claimed.

***Don’t want to upset those who do belong to such groups (and they are inevitably OUTSIDE The Church)***

When you are your own Pope, you create your own church. And therefore everyone else is outside your church. Neat, eh?


179 posted on 06/25/2009 7:14:46 PM PDT by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

They may be outside the Catholic church but not outside the universal catholic church, the body of Christ, which HE founded, not mere man. I thank God they ARE outside the Catholic church.


180 posted on 06/25/2009 9:48:15 PM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 221-228 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson