HELLO?
IT’S RC’S
WHO HAVE COVERED THE WATERFRONT WITH THE TEACHINGS OF THE VATICAN INSTITUTION
ON THESE THREADS! YEAR IN AND YEAR OUT!
Proddys hereon don’t have to twist a thing.
Your own documents indict you wholesale repeatedly.
And throw in the contradictory statements from a wide range of RC’s hereon . . . goodness . . . it sounds like a zoo or a circus of theological/intellectual gobbledy-gook to the max.
Normally this would be entirely too weird for me to address, but your post 535 to Mad Dawg’s post 531 sort of makes your statements in 542 (and everywhere else) seem kind of strange.
With that in mind, please elaborate on the truth you found in 531. I also saw a lot of truth in that post and I’m confounded that a post which makes an effort to refute most of what you’ve stated is something with which you appear to be in agreement.