[vladimir998]

Elsie, You do realize that those references to Peter were written years after the events described, right? Therefore, Simon was not ALREADY called Peter when those events unfolded. He was called Peter later and was known as Peter when the events were written about.

[Elsie]

Elsie, You do realize that those references to Peter were written years after the events described, right?

Do you REALLY wanna go down this road?

[Elsie]

Therefore, Simon was not ALREADY called Peter when those events unfolded.

So you are trying to claim that the writer, after an event (Duh! when else!!), would FAIL to provide the correct information about what took place?

[Melian]

“You do realize that those references to Peter were written years after the events described, right?”

Thanks, v998! It seemed insulting to point out that the name change was obviously being spelled out, long after it had happened, to try to clarify for the potentially confused.

Some people work so hard to stay confused!