To: CynicalBear
Then explain away 1 Timothy 3:4 where it says the have had to prove themselves capable by managing a household and children prior to being considered for leadership positions. The verse also says a bishop must have his children under submission. So you are saying someone must be married AND must have children to be considered to be a bishop? Someone married but without children cannot be a bishop?
So in your opinion, Paul was saying that he himself was not qualified to be a bishop?
29 posted on
02/02/2015 10:33:32 AM PST by
CA Conservative
(Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
To: CA Conservative
The verse also says a bishop must have his children under submission. So you are saying someone must be married AND must have children to be considered to be a bishop? Someone married but without children cannot be a bishop? So in your opinion, Paul was saying that he himself was not qualified to be a bishop?
And if your kid dies, you can't be Bishop anymore ;)
To: CA Conservative; RnMomof7; metmom; Gamecock; Trapped Behind Enemy Lines; DarkSavant; Morgana; ...
>>Someone married but without children cannot be a bishop?<<
Um,,,,,,that was Paul writing that, not me.
>>So in your opinion, Paul was saying that he himself was not qualified to be a bishop?<<
Prove that Paul was never married and didn't have children. Let me help a little there. All indications say that Paul was part of the Sanhedrin. To be a member of the Sanhedrin you had to be married and at least 30 years of age.
38 posted on
02/02/2015 11:19:52 AM PST by
CynicalBear
(For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson