“You still haven’t told me where the law against eating blood was rescinded especially for those like Jesus and the apostles who were still living under that law.”
1) You still haven’t shown me where all 613 Old Testament laws are still in effect on Christians.
2) You still haven’t shown me where Jesus - who is GOD - is bound by any law.
3) You still haven’t shown me how Jesus, in Mark 7:18-23 (and Mt. 15:17-20) must have been lying like a Protestant anti-Catholic when He declared that all foods, including animal blood, “clean” and that to eat them is not a sin.
4) You still haven’t shown me how God, in Acts 10, must have been lying like a Protestant anti-Catholic when St. Peter had a dream, in which all “unclean” foods were declared “clean to eat” by God Himself.
5) You still haven’t shown me how, in Matthew 23:13-36, Jesus must have been lying like a Protestant anti-Catholic when He said that it is not external ritual purity, which came from things like circumcision and ritual hand washing, but internal purity, which comes from living a morally upright life in God’s grace, which matters most.
That's because I never said that. The Holy Spirit and the apostles did however in Acts 15 say to not eat blood.
>>You still haven’t shown me where Jesus - who is GOD - is bound by any law.<<
Galatians 4:4 But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, born under the law,
Your own church says He was. Found here.
>>You still haven’t shown me how Jesus, in Mark 7:18-23 (and Mt. 15:17-20) must have been lying like a Protestant anti-Catholic when He declared that all foods, including animal blood, “clean” and that to eat them is not a sin.<<
Including blood you say? Please show that blood was EVER considered food to Jesus or the Israelites. Jesus was still under the law. That included eating blood.
>>You still haven’t shown me how God, in Acts 10, must have been lying like a Protestant anti-Catholic when St. Peter had a dream, in which all “unclean” foods were declared “clean to eat” by God Himself.<<
Again, please show where they EVER considered blood a food.
Jesus was born under the law and subject to it. Your own church concurs. The Holy Spirit through the apostles re stated the prohibition against eating blood as shown in Acts 15. Would you claim that the Holy Spirit was contradicting something Jesus said?
Now, why do you insist on teaching that Jesus sinned against the law He was born under and committed to keep?