Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did the Patriarchs Really Live to Be 900 Years Old? Perhaps, but Here’s Why We Do Not;
Archdiocese of Washington ^ | 08-11-15 | Msgr. Charles Pope

Posted on 08/12/2015 7:23:42 AM PDT by Salvation

Did the Patriarchs Really Live to Be 900 Years Old? Perhaps, but Here’s Why We Do Not

August 11, 2015

I sometimes get questions about the remarkably long lives of the patriarchs who lived before the great flood. Consider some of their reported ages when they died:

How to understand these references? There are many theories that have tried to explain the claimed longevity. Some try to introduce a mathematical corrective, but this leads to other pitfalls such as certain patriarchs apparently begetting children while they are still children themselves. Another approach is to say that the “ages” of the patriarchs are actually just indications of their influence or family line. But then things don’t add up chronologically with eras and family trees.

Personally, I think we need to take the stated ages of the patriarchs at face value and just accept it as a mystery: for some reason, the ancient patriarchs lived far longer we do in the modern era. I cannot prove that they actually lived that long, but neither is there strong evidence that they did not. Frankly, I have little stake in insisting that they did in fact live that long. But if you ask me, I think it is best just to accept that they did.

This solution, when I articulate it, causes many to scoff. They almost seem to be offended. The reply usually sounds something like this: “That’s crazy. There’s no way they lived that long. The texts must be wrong.” To which I generally reply, “Why do you think it is crazy or impossible?” The answers usually range from the glib to the more serious, but here are some common replies:

  1. They didn’t know how to tell time the way we do today. Well, actually, they were pretty good at keeping time, in some ways better than we are today. The ancients were keen observers of the Sun, the Moon, and the stars. They had to be, otherwise they would have starved. It was crucial to know when to plant, when to harvest, and when to hunt (e.g., the migratory and/or hibernation patterns of animals through the seasons). The ancients may not have had timepieces that were accurate to the minute, but they were much more in sync with the rhythms of the cosmos than most of us are. They certainly knew what a day, month, and year were by the cycles of the Sun, the Moon, and the stars.
  2. They couldn’t have lived that long because they didn’t have the medicines we do today. Perhaps, but it is also possible that they didn’t have the diseases we do. Perhaps they ate and lived in more healthy ways than we do. Perhaps the gene pool later became corrupted in a way that it was not back then. There are just a lot of things we cannot possibly know. The claim about our advanced technology (medicine) also shows a tendency of us moderns to think that no one in the world has ever been smarter or healthier than we are. Our modern times surely do have advanced technologies, but we also have things that potentially make us more susceptible to disease: stress, anxiety, overly rich diets, pollutants, promiscuity, drug use, and hormonal contraceptives. There are lots of ways in which we live out of sync with the natural world.
  3. Those long years just symbolize wisdom or influence. OK fine, but what is the scale? Does Adam living to 930 mean he attained great wisdom? But wait, David wasn’t any slouch and he only made it to 70. And if Seth was so influential (living to 912) where are the books recording his influence such as we have for Moses, who lived to be only In other words, we can’t just throw a scale out there indicating influence or wisdom without some further definition of what the numbers actually mean.
  4. Sorry, people just don’t live that long. Well, today they don’t. But why is something automatically assumed to be false simply because it doesn’t comport with lived experience today? It is not physically impossible in an absolute sense for a human being to live for hundreds of years. Most humans today die short of 100 years of age, but some live longer. Certain closely related mammals like dogs and cats live only 15 to 20 years. Why is there such a large difference in life expectancy between humans and other similar animals? There is obviously some mysterious clock that winds down more quickly for certain animals than for others. So there is a mystery to the longevity of various living things, even those that are closely related. Perhaps the ancients had what amounted to preternatural gifts. (A preternatural gift is one that is not supernatural (i.e., completely above and beyond our nature or ability to do) but rather one that builds on our nature and extends its capabilities beyond what is normally or currently experienced.)

So I think we’re back to where we started: just taking the long life spans of the early patriarchs at face value.

There is perhaps a theological truth hidden in the shrinking lifespans of the Old Testament. The scriptures link sin and death. Adam and Eve were warned that the day they ate of the forbidden fruit of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, they would die (Gen 2:17). But they did not drop dead immediately, and though they died spiritually in an instant, the clock of death for their bodies wound down much later. As the chart above shows, as sin increased, lifespans dropped precipitously, especially after the flood.

Prior to the flood, lifespans remained in the vicinity of 900 years, but right afterward they dropped by about a third (Noah and Shem only lived to 600), and then the numbers plummeted even further. Neither Abraham nor Moses even reached 200, and by the time of King David, he would write, Our years are seventy, or eighty for those who are strong (Ps 90:10).

Scripture says, For the wages of sin is death (Rom 6:23). Indeed they are, especially in terms of lifespan. And perhaps that is why I am not too anxious to try to disprove the long lifespans of the patriarchs. For what we know theologically is borne out in our human experience: sin is life-destroying. And this truth is surely writ large in the declining lifespan of the human family.

Does this prove that Adam actually lived to be more than 900 years old? No. It only shows that declining lifespans are something we fittingly discover in a world of sin. Since God teaches that sin brings death, why should we be shocked that our lifespan has decreased from 900 to 85 years? It is what it is. It’s a sad truth that God warned us about. Thanks be to God our Father who in Jesus now offers us eternal life, if we will have faith and obey His Son!

So how or even whether the patriarchs lived past 900 is not clear. But what is theologically clear is that we don’t live that long today because of the collective effect of sin upon us.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; History; Theology
KEYWORDS: catholic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last
An interesting topic to ponder.
1 posted on 08/12/2015 7:23:42 AM PDT by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; NYer; ELS; Pyro7480; livius; ArrogantBustard; Catholicguy; RobbyS; marshmallow; ...

Monsignor Pope Ping!


2 posted on 08/12/2015 7:25:48 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

I wouldn’t call it a mystery, especially considering they most likely had superior genes. And that of course undermines the notion of any “master race” based on genetics.


3 posted on 08/12/2015 7:26:54 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

One of God’s fun mysteries.


4 posted on 08/12/2015 7:28:20 AM PDT by exnavy (Common sense seems to be uncommon these days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

I picked up a book called “The Biblical Flood and the Ice Epoch” back in the early 80’s that exposed me to some interesting parts of genesis.

It strongly suggests that before the great flood there was no such thing as direct sunlight, rain, starry nights, etc. and there was almost certainly a MUCH thicker ozone layer. But we came into close proximity to another planet for a while and, well, the great flood, mountain ranges created (thanks to magma tides), ice dumped on our poles, etc. The continental shelves used to be dry land. There were no mountain ranges, etc.


5 posted on 08/12/2015 7:28:42 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

What about the “sin” part of his article?


6 posted on 08/12/2015 7:29:29 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Perfect genetics, and I mean absolutely PERFECT genetics, were present in Adam and Eve, who were essentially male and female “clones”.

As the generations went by within the framework of a cursed/fallen world, our genes began to “drift” and the only reason we maintain even a semblance of 3 score and 10 or 4 score is our modern medicines.


7 posted on 08/12/2015 7:30:12 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Ice canopy around the Earth. God set air to separate the waters from the waters. This explains dinosaurs too. They were just lizards that lived a long time because of the earths favorable conditions. The canopy broke which flooded the earth. People started living shorter lives after the flood. The Hovind Theory.
8 posted on 08/12/2015 7:30:25 AM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

That sounds like an extremely interesting book.


9 posted on 08/12/2015 7:31:05 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Interesting. I never gave it much thought. I just took it at face value. I can see the argument that they would not have had the concept of time like we do. They would know days and months and seasons and a yearly cycle, but did they write down how many calendar years and say “happy ### birthday”? Anyway, I just consider the bible to be the word of God and NOTHING in it is an error.


10 posted on 08/12/2015 7:31:24 AM PDT by wattsgnu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

“Prior to the flood, lifespans remained in the vicinity of 900 years, but right afterward they dropped ...”

That there’s your answer. The water canopy collapsed (and the waters from the deep erupted), which radically changed the environment, and also left humans more exposed to solar stuff ...


11 posted on 08/12/2015 7:31:37 AM PDT by Theo (May Christ be exalted above all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Earth was spinning a lot faster.


12 posted on 08/12/2015 7:32:57 AM PDT by CharleysPride (non chiedere cio che non si puo prendere -- Charlie Daniels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Dr. Huge Ross has written on this subject. I will add that people did live longer in the time before Noah and proof is biblical diets. The biblical diets of old were more conducive to longer lives.

We also know that aging is biological helped by environmental toxins, Solar radiation and Cosmic Radiation. In short, we know of a supernova that occurred around the time of Noah that increased the amount of cosmic radiation in our solar system. This continues today.

13 posted on 08/12/2015 7:33:07 AM PDT by 11th Commandment ("THOSE WHO TIRE LOSE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
I don't believe it is a literal age of one human but more of a way of describing the age of a family or clan and its influence.
14 posted on 08/12/2015 7:33:46 AM PDT by JPG (What's the difference between the Rats and the GOPe? Nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

“So how or even whether the patriarchs lived past 900 is not clear.”

Though he personally seems to believe they lived really long lives, he allows for doubt. And what he doubts is the veracity of the Bible itself.

Doubt as to the literal truth of Genesis is one of the main drivers of apostasy in our day.


15 posted on 08/12/2015 7:33:51 AM PDT by .45 Long Colt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demshateGod

Never thought of it this way.

But it makes sense....the extremes of temperature in the summer and the low temps of winter do take a toll on some people.

I am one who does not like it to go above 80 degrees in the summer. Sadly that hasn’t been the case in Oregon this year. (89 or 90 today)


16 posted on 08/12/2015 7:35:01 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

They probably lived to be 80. Don’t take the Bible literally.


17 posted on 08/12/2015 7:35:12 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .45 Long Colt

Logically in a different world before the flood it could be true.
Maybe the sun is what limits our lifespan and maybe before the great flood the sky was more covered in vapor and the whole thing made lifespans longer.

Could have been, I wasn’t there.


18 posted on 08/12/2015 7:36:21 AM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Theo
That there’s your answer. The water canopy collapsed (and the waters from the deep erupted), which radically changed the environment, and also left humans more exposed to solar stuff ...

I have been saying this for years when asked to explain lifespans pre-flood and post-flood.

It may also have helped to screw up the gene pool and made begatting amongst close family members verboten.

19 posted on 08/12/2015 7:36:33 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedys-Can't drive, can't ski, can't fly, can't skipper a boat-But they know what's best for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: All
The Bible clearly states that the Patriarchs lived those numbers of years. And Msgr. Pope "can't prove it."

Because as we all "know," the testimony of G-d Himself isn't good enough for Catholics (or Orthodox).

20 posted on 08/12/2015 7:38:43 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (The "end of history" will be Worldwide Judaic Theocracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson