Posted on 11/28/2017 12:09:34 PM PST by ebb tide
The problem is, there is no manuscript of Matthew in Hebrew.
Another may have won for himself (if not permanent banishment) a ‘time out’;
http://freerepublic.com/~hrvatskinoahid/
and the curious hole at #1281 (http://freerepublic.com/focus/religion/3608661/posts?q=1&;page=1251) that followed having posted in Croatian(?) at #1279;
“B-g Izraelov unistit ce sve neprijatelje zidovskoga naroda.”
google translate indicates Croatian, and translation into English;
“Israel will unite all the enemies of the Jewish people.”
Lots of conflict these days.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3vxICqNhmxk (Elton John- Where To Now St. Peter (demo —piano/vocals only) 1970)
Your posts make no sense and are contradictory. And I thought the Roman Catholics were off base.
More than likely, a time out.
A bit of a purging of the obnoxious and rule-breaking today!
It’s a good day.
We will see. He was warned a few months ago about getting suspended.
If he comes back, from what I’ve seen of him, his hatred will only be growing and it won’t be long ‘til he gets shuffled off again.
hn was a relative noob. Sign up date of 5/22/2017.
I’m going to guess gone for good based on what you translated.
I know. You're replying to the wrong person.
In Ephiesians, and everywhere else, Paul says that by the grace of God we are saved by our faith!
In Romans 2 he makes it as plain as can be:
Romans 2:
[12] For as many as have sinned without law shall also perish without law: and as many as have sinned in the law shall be judged by the law;
[13] (For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified.
[14] For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves:
[15] Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another;)
What could be said more plainly?
Go ahead, deny or ignore the parts that cannot be twisted to something more appealing to your ears! Have you ever read James epistle? Do you just say it doesn't belong in the Bible?
.
Where is any contradiction?
Where is anyone appointed as interpreter?
If you want an interpreter you are catholic to the core.
If we pray for understanding it is given, through reading, but never through an interpreter.
.
I did not think this thread was still going, but ET helped with that There goes about a third of the TradRC news service via FR.
*Sigh*
Read Paul’s letter to the Ephesians.
“4 But because of his great love for us, God, who is rich in mercy, 5 made us alive with Christ even when we were dead in transgressionsit is by grace you have been saved. 6 And God raised us up with Christ and seated us with him in the heavenly realms in Christ Jesus, 7 in order that in the coming ages he might show the incomparable riches of his grace, expressed in his kindness to us in Christ Jesus. 8 For it is by grace you have been saved, through faithand this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God 9 not by works, so that no one can boast. 10 For we are Gods handiwork, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do.”
In other words, you’re absolutely wrong and you’re Biblically illiterate on top of that.
Good game.
Salvation by grace is the theme that runs throughout most of the NT.
But there will always be those who think they can be good enough to do something that pleases God enough to save them, or at least overlook their sin.
Or True Scotsmen; either.
Let's see your evidence.
Dont be vague.
Six Cohenim commissioned by the Israeli to follow in Rons tracks are dead, and their carcasses had to be pulled out by Ron at the request of the Israeli government.
I really do NOT get how (some) Caths and the other works-righteousness people don’t get that plain, simple meaning.
Well, probably that they don’t WANT to get it, but that’s another story.
A lot of Catholicism is “snippet” Scripture - bits and pieces of verses - used to present at least a semblance that the religion is Bible-based. Take a look at the Catechism. No wonder he only picked out the parts he thought proved his ridiculous point! Terrible way to establish doctrine. It gets very hard to do that anymore when so much is available for reference on the Internet.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.