Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Strategies for Returning to the [Catholic] Church
CE.com ^ | 01-11-18 | James Day

Posted on 01/11/2018 6:54:52 PM PST by Salvation

Strategies for Returning to the Church

James Day

Our world is a fallen world. The effects of sin seem to be suffocating us. The diabolical is running rampant, unleashed, playing with immortal souls as if puppets on a string. Pride continues to dominate; repentance for anything is deemed archaic, of little use to today’s enlightened thinking.

Certainly this is not the positive language one wants to hear at the outset of a new year, when expectations and resolutions are running high. But all is not really so dire: the diabolical and pervasive sin has not crushed the divine light. “My Immaculate Heart will triumph,” promises the Lady of Fatima. There is a reason the Church opens a new year honoring the Mother of God: obedience to accepting one’s mission in life is the most daunting — and exciting — prospect we face on this earth. We have a guidebook in how to do it through Mary’s fiat.

Perhaps over holiday festivities and the euphoria — and stress — of families coming together, some readers might have encountered resistance from relatives regarding the graces offered in entering the mystery of faith during this holy season. Whether it was avoidance from some in either attending Christmas Mass or praying before a Christmas dinner, such discomforts surely existed. While certainly everyone is different, with their own freedom and right to privacy, perhaps there are some of you readers whose own children—raised in the Catholic faith you so diligently sought to instill in them — want nothing to do with it anymore. It is to this element I wish to address.

In my own experience, generally speaking, I have found degrees of toleration from lapsed or non-Catholics regarding matters of the faith — they know the Catholic Church continues to play an enormous part in global affairs while recalling their own experiences either through schooling or parish life. I have found that while the pervading motif of the millennial generation is a general shunning towards organized religion and regular church attendance, there yet remains a desire for an experience of the transcendent. And that desire is the silver lining.

Unfortunately, committed Catholics are not always quite the fearless galvanized evangelizers that each one is called to be. Marveling that St. Francis de Sales converted 40,000 is usually met with a shrug: “Well, that’s why he’s a saint.” But that’s the precisely the mentality that needs to change.

A Jesuit once posed in a homily, “Listen to conversations. How long does it take before God is ever mentioned?” Out of not wanting to create controversy, God is never mentioned. When he is, or when the Church is mentioned, Catholics are immediately put on the defensive. We can stay silent, letting the Uber driver, for example, have his say about the occultish practice of Catholics (as I experienced recently), or we can defend Holy Mother Church, as we would defend our own mother, and begin a conversation. The faith is not part of the pie of life. It is the pie.

I have come to believe that, in this era, accommodation will not work. Appeasing the culture may seem like a conciliatory gesture, but those on the opposite side most probably will not respect such compromise—even if they do not agree with the position in question. In reading Paul Kengor’s new book, A Pope and a President, on President Reagan and Pope St. John Paul II’s battles against communism, the consistency in the Church’s long running condemnation of communism as far back as Pius IX is impressive. The Church may have apologized for grievous actions throughout its long history, but it has never apologized for being magnificent.

So, how to engage your lapsed love one on returning to the Church? After all, that is our sole duty—to grow into our authentic selves, made in the image of God, and safeguard our immortal souls and those of others towards eternal life. Remembering we can only extend an invitation, a proposal, respecting the freedom of others, here are some strategies:

I: Know Thyself

Be yourself a model of virtue.

Live the Gospel, avoiding hypocrisy, condemnation of others, descent into pettiness. If you consider yourself a Catholic first and desire others to feel that same zeal, your example is the best model. Just like Mary.

Avoid “preaching.”

Respectfully engage in conversation in whatever topic arises. Listen to the other person. Avoid shouting or screaming. Do not let a discussion become an argument or a fight. But know the teachings rather than relying on your own emotions in the heat of the moment.

Pray constantly (1 Thessalonians 5:16).

Read Scripture daily, particularly the Gospels, alone or with family. Have the Catechism handy. Always be reading a spiritual work. Your own edification will inevitably seep into your own worldview. Petition the Trinity for guidance. Ask saints for intercession. Call on the Blessed Mother multiple times a day.

Know your own spiritual story.

What were the integral moments for you in your faith formation? Where did God reveal Himself? Write your own spiritual autobiography in a way that you find creative and inspiring. “Know thyself” is not just an ancient Greek saying. It’s vital to one’s own development.

“Pray the Mass,” as St. Pius X instructs.

Throw your fears and pains onto the altar. Bow your head at the Consecration; respect the Real Presence of Jesus Christ.

II: Extend an Invitation

Know the story of your lapsed child or loved one.

“Communication is simply mutual understanding,” says Stephen R. Covey. You have to care about who they are, where they’ve been, and where they want to go — while you are called to evangelize, you cannot treat them as an agenda, a project. In this way, study Ignatian spirituality for insight on the discernment of spirits. You are always an unofficial spiritual director to someone!

Find common ground.

There are many launching points one can meet due to the richness of the Catholic faith. Unfortunately, many lapsed Catholics have a distorted or misinformed view of the faith, just as many in the Protestant and evangelical world have a Reformation-era concept of the papacy. Much time may be spent on clearing the cobwebs on the reality of the Catholic Church today. Yes, corruption and scandal and atrocities have weakened the moral authority of the Church. But there is a difference between human failings and the Church as founded by Christ handed to Saint Peter (Matthew 16:18). That needs to be made clear. (See Joseph Ratzinger, “Why I Am Still in the Church.”)

Nurture their interests.

“For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also” (Luke 12:34). Getting to know your loved one authentically and establishing common ground will offer new avenues of appreciation. Are they artists, musicians, poets, writers? Michelangelo, Gaudi, chant, or the great classics of literature offer beautiful immersive experiences in the Catholic worldview.

Pope Francis has been an inspiration for those of any background, through his environment work, Laudato Si, or his call for activism towards migrants, refugees, the disenfranchised.

Connect them with possibly like minded individuals who might continue the conversation, depending on their interests: educators, bioethicists, Father Spitzer’s Magis Institute on science, faith, and reason. Historical subjects on the veracity of Jesus: the Shroud of Turin, for example (see Ian Wilson’s The Shroud, among others).

Give your lapsed child or loved one Matthew Kelly’s Rediscover Catholicism or a similar book that perhaps impacted you. Rediscover appeals to the mainstream, ringing distant bells they would have remembered growing up Catholic. In many ways, that book is an appetizer to what awaits.

Bottom line: communicate the resources provided by so many apostolates—there is something for everyone. Many of those actively engaged in the mission of salvation, the mission of the Church, were once lapsed themselves. Just ask St. Augustine, Dorothy Day, or many great evangelizers in our day and age.

Invite your lapsed child or loved one to Confession.

It’s a challenging invitation. But you’ve at least put it out there. At the same time, do not let the graces of Confession become distorted. While one receives absolution, authentic penance comes when one’s life is turned around. So often the thought is that a few “Hail Marys” and “Our Fathers” is all the Church demands for conciliation. Actually, one must authentically set out determined to begin anew, a new person, transformed. Vinny Flynn’s 7 Secrets of Confession is a powerful little book for guidance.

Extend an invitation to Mass.

Bring an extra copy of Magnificat or a book with daily readings and give your loved one a copy. Sit up close. And then pray the Mass. Together.

Give your loved one Benedict XVI’s Jesus of Nazareth.

Along with the timelessness of the Scriptures themselves, this trilogy is written for people of our time to rediscover Christ. It is some of the most staggering spiritual reading you will encounter.

III: Going Forward

Three very simple, practical steps:

Happy New Year!



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; History; Theology
KEYWORDS: catholic; evangelization; prayer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 661-674 next last
To: imardmd1

Confusion? the only thing that confuses me is why people who
does not believe any thing Jesus said even bothers to claim
him as lord,

But wait. Maybe I don’t know that you do.


281 posted on 01/13/2018 5:42:08 PM PST by ravenwolf (Left lane drivers and tailgaters are the smallest peabrains in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: ADSUM; metmom
In the context of Jesus saying “he who rejects me rejects him (the Father) who sent me,” Jesus said, “He who hears you hears me, and he who rejects you rejects me, and he who rejects me rejects him who sent me.”

Are you serious? That is simply not going to do it, since this is actually begging the question, presuming the very thing that needs to be proved, that "you" here refers to Rome and uniquely so.

Meanwhile even being a man who can preach the word of God does not mean he always will be speaking it based upon a criteria/ formula that he comes up with to assert that he is.

Which is what Rome did. For she has presumed to infallibly declare she is and will be perpetually infallible whenever she speaks in accordance with her infallibly defined (scope and subject-based) formula, which renders her declaration that she is infallible, to be infallible, as well as all else she accordingly declares.

282 posted on 01/13/2018 5:42:30 PM PST by daniel1212 (Trust the risen Lord Jesus to save you as a damned and destitute sinner + be baptized + follow Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: metmom

YOPIOS?


283 posted on 01/13/2018 5:50:53 PM PST by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: Luircin

YOPIOS = Your Own Personal Interpretation of Scripture.

It’s what they accuse us of when we don’t swallow hook, line, and sinker the Catholic church party line, no matter how much it contradicts God’s word.


284 posted on 01/13/2018 5:53:10 PM PST by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

You probably know much more about them than I do but you are
right, it looks bad, real bad, and it does no good to put out
the facts when no one can read them.

I will try to do better the next time.


285 posted on 01/13/2018 5:55:43 PM PST by ravenwolf (Left lane drivers and tailgaters are the smallest peabrains in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: imardmd1

I gave you the keys to it
...........................
When you use those keys use caution as
it is liable to be one hell of a drop.


286 posted on 01/13/2018 6:07:49 PM PST by ravenwolf (Left lane drivers and tailgaters are the smallest peabrains in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981; aMorePerfectUnion; ealgeone; metmom; Luircin; boatbums
“Flesh" in this instance is a reference to Gentiles being physically circumcised (the flesh of the foreskin being cut off)

I disagree with your interpretation bro. Flesh is unregenerate, weak human nature. I thought you needed a priest to interpret for you? Did you do that? I don’t need a priest to help me interpret scripture.
It seems like it all comes down to interpretation, yours or mine. It amazes me, how you and I can read a ton of New Testament verses, and come away with views 180 degrees opposite each other. Utterly amazing. Either you are right, or I am right, but certainly not both of us.
You should read those verses you posted from Galatians, without the Catholic blinders on, and take it to heart.
I think works based religionists are the foolish ones, and are fallen from grace. My interpretation is, they are fallen from grace, simply because they NEVER had it in the first place.
I am not confident you will take this to heart. That’s on you bro. I guess it all comes down to who goes to Heaven, and who doesn’t. I have no intention of being in the “who doesn’t” category. I don’t have any idea which category you are in. Have a nice eternity bro. I plan to. 😇
AF_ Vet_ 1967-1987

287 posted on 01/13/2018 6:39:04 PM PST by Mark17 (Genesis chapter 1 verse 1. In the beginning GOD....And the rest, as they say, is HIS-story)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Salvation is found in Jesus Christ alone.

Doesn't matter what the rest of the world is doing.

You are correct MM. God could care less what church you do or do not go too. Now, I am sure He doesn’t want us in Mormonism, JWs, Torah law, INC, and other cults, but He is not going to ask us which church we attended. He will only ask what did we do with Christ. In fact, I don’t believe He will even ask that. He already knows what we did with Christ. 👍😄😇

288 posted on 01/13/2018 6:59:03 PM PST by Mark17 (Genesis chapter 1 verse 1. In the beginning GOD....And the rest, as they say, is HIS-story)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: ADSUM; metmom
In the process of justification we must distinguish two periods: first, the preparatory acts or dispositions (faith, fear, hope, etc.); then the last, decisive moment of the transformation of the sinner from the state of sin to that of justification or sanctifying grace, which may be called the active justification (actus justificationis); with this the real process comes to an end, and the state of habitual holiness and sonship of God begins...

The Church teaches that justification consists of an actual obliteration of sin and an interior sanctification. Protestantism, on the other hand, makes of the forgiveness of sin merely a concealment of it, so to speak; and of the sanctification a forensic declaration of justification, or an external imputation of the justice of Christ.

Your personal opinion. Not theologically correct. Classic Protestantism teaches that justification does not happen until there is regeneration (I believe faith comes first, by grace) which leads to purification by faith - the very change Catholicism holds makes the baptized "formally justified and made holy by his own personal justice and holiness.” ( Catholic Encyclopedia>Sanctifying Grace)

But since - despite the claim of actual obliteration of sin by the very act of baptism - the sin nature is alive and well, and has its outworking, then unless before he dies the soul attains to the rare state of being good enough in character to enter Heaven, including free from any attachment to sin, then the Catholic must endure purifying torments commencing at death, which Scripture nowhere teaches for the believer (want evidence to the contrary?).

Going back to the Catholic description Protestant justification merely making "the forgiveness of sin merely a concealment of it, so to speak, Calvin states,

To prove the first point—that God justifies not only by pardoning but by regenerating—he (Osiander) asks whether God leaves as they were by nature those whom he justifies, changing none of their vices. This is exceedingly easy to answer; as Christ cannot be torn into parts, so these two which we perceive in him together and conjointly are inseparable—namely, righteousness and sanctification.

Whomever, therefore, God receives into grace, on them he at the same time bestows the spirit of adoption [Rom. 8:15], by whose power he remakes them to his own image...The grace of justification is not separated from regeneration, although they are things distinct - John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion. Found in The Library of Christian Classics (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1960), Volume XIX, Book III, Chp. XI.6,11; pp. 732, 739; https://www.christiantruth.com/articles/gospelregeneration.html

R.C. Sproul observes: Technically the term justification does refer to the declarative judicial act of God and not to the person who receives the benefit of this declarative act and is said to be justified. The declaration changes the status of the believer and not his or her nature. However, as John Gerstner relentlessly points out, it is not a declaration about or directed toward people who are not changed in their constituent nature. God never declares a change in the status of people who are unchanged in nature...The antinomian error (assumes) that God justifies people who are and remain unchanged. All who are justified possess faith. Faith abides as a necessary condition for justification. All who have faith are regenerate. Reformed theology sees regeneration as a necessary condition for faith. All who are regenerated are changed in their natures.

It is not change in our nature wrought by regeneration or our faith that flows from it that is the ground of our justification. That remains solely the imputation of the righteousness of Christ. But that righteousness is not imputed to unbelieving or unregenerate persons. (Justification by Faith Alone, Don Kistler, Ed. (Morgan: Soli Deo Gloria, 1995), The Forensic Nature of Justification, pp. 43-45).

The last statement is particularly opposed to Rome's salvation by grace thru works, in which one must actually become good enough to be with God, thus necessitating the invention of RC Purgatory. .


The Catholic Encyclopedia states that St. Augustine "describes two conditions of men; "some there are who have departed this life, not so bad as to be deemed unworthy of mercy, nor so good as to be entitled to immediate happiness" etc.

And thus by the close of the fourth century was taught
"a place of purgation..from which when purified they "were admitted unto the Holy Mount of the Lord". For " they were "not so good as to be entitled to eternal happiness". - CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Purgatory

Likewise Catholic professor Peter Kreeft states,

"...we will go to Purgatory first, and then to Heaven after we are purged of all selfishness and bad habits and character faults." Peter Kreeft, Because God Is Real: Sixteen Questions, One Answer, p. 224

However, wherever Scripture clearly speak of the next conscious reality for believers then it is with the Lord, (Lk. 23:43 [cf. 2Cor. 12:4; Rv. 2:7]; Phil 1:23; 2Cor. 5:8 [“we”]; 1Cor. 15:51ff'; 1Thess. 4:17) Note in the latter case all believers were assured that if the Lord returned, which they expected in their lifetime, so would they “ever be with the Lord,” though they were still undergoing growth in grace, as was Paul. (Phil. 3:7f)

And the next transformative experience that is manifestly taught is that of being like Christ in the resurrection. (1Jn. 3:2; Rm. 8:23; 1Co 15:53,54; 2Co. 2-4) At which time is the judgment seat of Christ, which is the only suffering after this life, which does not begin at death, but awaits the Lord's return, (1 Corinthians 4:5; 2 Timothy. 4:1,8; Revelation 11:18; Matthew 25:31-46; 1 Peter 1:7; 5:4) and is the suffering of the loss of rewards (and the Lord's displeasure) due to the manner of material one built the church with, which one is saved despite the loss of such, not because of. (1 Corinthians 3:8ff)

In addition, the whole premise that suffering itself perfects a person is specious, since testing of character requires being able to choose btwn alternatives, and which this world provides. Thus it is only this world that Scripture peaks of here development of character, such as "Wherein ye greatly rejoice, though now for a season, if need be, ye are in heaviness through manifold temptations." (1 Peter 1:6)

And even in making the Lord "perfect" as in experiencing testing, being "in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin," (Hebrews 4:15) then it was in this world: "For it became him, for whom are all things, and by whom are all things, in bringing many sons unto glory, to make the captain of their salvation perfect through sufferings." (Hebrews 2:10) ter 1:6)

And even in making the Lord "perfect" as in experiencing testing, being "in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin," (Hebrews 4:15) then it was in this world: "For it became him, for whom are all things, and by whom are all things, in bringing many sons unto glory, to make the captain of their salvation perfect through sufferings." (Hebrews 2:10) :7; 5:4) and is the suffering of the loss of rewards (and the Lord's displeasure) due to the manner of material one built the church with, which one is saved despite the loss of such, not because of. (1 Corinthians 3:8ff)


In addition, the whole premise that suffering itself perfects a person is specious, since testing of character requires being able to choose btwn alternatives, and which this world provides. Thus it is only this world that Scripture peaks of here development of character, such as "Wherein ye greatly rejoice, though now for a season, if need be, ye are in heaviness through manifold temptations." (1 Peter 1:6)

And even in making the Lord "perfect" as in experiencing testing, being "in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin," (Hebrews 4:15) then it was in this world: "For it became him, for whom are all things, and by whom are all things, in bringing many sons unto glory, to make the captain of their salvation perfect through sufferings." (Hebrews 2:10)



289 posted on 01/13/2018 6:59:40 PM PST by daniel1212 (Trust the risen Lord Jesus to save you as a damned and destitute sinner + be baptized + follow Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: Mark17
“ I thought you needed a priest to interpret for you? Did you do that? I don’t need a priest to help me interpret scripture.“

😂

290 posted on 01/13/2018 6:59:49 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf
I will try to do better the next time.

Thanks bro. 😀 I wanted to read your post, but it turned my eyeballs inside out. 😄 I just couldn’t get it. 😞

291 posted on 01/13/2018 7:06:58 PM PST by Mark17 (Genesis chapter 1 verse 1. In the beginning GOD....And the rest, as they say, is HIS-story)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf

You see and see but do not perceive, you keep on hearing but do not undertand; and you cannot, since you already claimed that you hate religion. In what do you trust? One cannot be saved just by reading and quoting the Bible, eh?


292 posted on 01/13/2018 7:40:41 PM PST by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212
Yes, reafd it through. It brings to light the fact that in other situations where Simon was actng presumptuous, Jesus reproved his ambition thoroughly, though without loosing him to follow his own devices as He did Judas Iscariot.

Thanks for this nugget of insight, Bro.

293 posted on 01/13/2018 8:02:41 PM PST by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Did Jesus say anything to Peter to indicate at name change?

Mark 3:16

294 posted on 01/13/2018 8:43:12 PM PST by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: Luircin
. . . the Catholic hierarchy actually protected were child molesters.

Fixed that.

295 posted on 01/13/2018 8:49:16 PM PST by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion
“ I thought you needed a priest to interpret for you? Did you do that? I don’t need a priest to help me interpret scripture.“

😂

YOPIOS is my middle name. 👍😇

296 posted on 01/13/2018 9:00:26 PM PST by Mark17 (Genesis chapter 1 verse 1. In the beginning GOD....And the rest, as they say, is HIS-story)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: ADSUM

She sinned. I don’t need to prove that! I don’t need to prove you’ve sinned. God says so.

Could Mary have paid the price for your sin? Could she have been your redeemer? Her alleged sinlessness wouldn’t even require a co-redeeming partner. She could have been the perfect lamb of God - all by her sinless self.

I guess your baseless belief would have to buy that lie, too.

The depth of dark deception is beyond imagination.

Your position is so untenable and twisted that I think we’re done.

Goodbye.


297 posted on 01/13/2018 9:19:35 PM PST by Ken Regis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf
FYI...you need to use HTML to separate paragraphs. See here for some of them http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3378678/posts
298 posted on 01/13/2018 10:04:37 PM PST by boatbums (The Law is a storm which wrecks your hopes of self-salvation, but washes you upon the Rock of Ages.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: imardmd1

True.

And those that weren’t protected those that were.

And the author of this piece and the people on this thread are trying to tell us that the RCC won’t even protect children’s bodies, but can definitely be trusted with our eternal souls.


299 posted on 01/13/2018 11:03:50 PM PST by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: imardmd1
Yes, reafd it through. It brings to light the fact that in other situations where Simon was actng presumptuous, Jesus reproved his ambition thoroughly, though without loosing him to follow his own devices as He did Judas Iscariot.

I was actually focusing on the part on Garland and C.C. Caragounis’s study on kephas.

300 posted on 01/14/2018 2:48:15 AM PST by daniel1212 (Trust the risen Lord Jesus to save you as a damned and destitute sinner + be baptized + follow Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 661-674 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson